Literature DB >> 8713913

Long-duration metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasties with low wear of the articulating surfaces.

T P Schmalzried1, P C Peters, B T Maurer, C R Bragdon, W H Harris.   

Abstract

The 20-year performance of metal-on-metal hip articulations has not been reported. Five McKee-Farrar total hip prostheses and one Sivash prosthesis were obtained at revision surgery after a mean implantation time of 21.3 years. A radiographic, histologic, implant, and wear analysis was performed on these total hip implants with cobalt-chrome metal-on-metal articulations. All cases were associated with femoral component loosening, but the bearing surfaces performed remarkably well. The worst case estimate of combined femoral and acetabular linear wear was 4.2 microns per year, about 25 times less than that typically seen with polyethylene. Metal particles and foreign-body inflammation were seen in all cases, but the volume of reactive tissue was small compared with what is generally seen at revision of hips with a polyethylene acetabular bearing. This may be due to a reduced particle burden or a decreased inflammatory reaction to particulate metal, or both. In addition to articular wear, other sources of metal particles included femoral neck impingement on the acetabular rim, stem burnishing, and corrosion. Prosthetic hip reconstructions can fail for many reasons, including suboptimal femoral stem and/or acetabular cup design and/or fixation. By today's standards, the McKee-Farrar and Sivash stem and acetabular component designs are suboptimal; however, after more than 20 years of use, the metal-on-metal bearing surfaces in these cases demonstrated low wear and do not appear to be the cause of failure. Recent advances in total hip arthroplasty, which include improved implant design, materials, manufacturing, and fixation, combined with a better understanding of the mechanisms of implant loosening and failure, suggest that the cobalt-chrome metal-on-metal bearing be reexamined as an alternative to polyethylene when exceptional durability is required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8713913     DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(96)80085-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  26 in total

1.  [Hip resurfacing arthroplasty].

Authors:  W-C Witzleb; A Knecht; T Beichler; T Köhler; K-P Günther
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Cup loosening after cemented Metasul® total hip replacement: a retrieval analysis.

Authors:  Christophe Nich; Moussa Hamadouche
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Do large heads enhance stability and restore native anatomy in primary total hip arthroplasty?

Authors:  Adolph V Lombardi; Michael D Skeels; Keith R Berend; Joanne B Adams; Orlando J Franchi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Serum ion level after metal-on-metal THA in patients with renal failure.

Authors:  Chang Ich Hur; Taek Rim Yoon; Sang Gwon Cho; Eun Kyoo Song; Jong Keun Seon
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-02-10       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Gait and stair function in total and resurfacing hip arthroplasty: a pilot study.

Authors:  M Wade Shrader; Manoshi Bhowmik-Stoker; Marc C Jacofsky; David J Jacofsky
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-03-21       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  The effect of the metal-on-metal hip controversy on Internet search activity.

Authors:  Nigel Phelan; John C Kelly; David P Moore; Patrick Kenny
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-01-04

Review 7.  Mediators of the inflammatory response to joint replacement devices.

Authors:  Neil Cobelli; Brian Scharf; Giovanna M Crisi; John Hardin; Laura Santambrogio
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 20.543

8.  Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty: An Evidence-Based Analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2006-02-01

9.  Patients report improvement in quality of life and satisfaction after hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

Authors:  Wael A Rahman; Nelson V Greidanus; Alexander Siegmeth; Bassam A Masri; Clive P Duncan; Donald S Garbuz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty does equally well in osteonecrosis and osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Manish R Dastane; William T Long; Zhinian Wan; Lisa Chao; Lawrence D Dorr
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-03-19       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.