Literature DB >> 8711604

Exposure for laparoscopic cholecystectomy dissection adversely alters biliary ductal anatomy.

R C McIntyre1, D D Bensard, G V Stiegmann, N W Pearlman, J Durham.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Exposure for open cholecystectomy entails lateral, caudal traction on the gallbladder infundibulum, which results in opening the angle between the cystic and hepatic ducts. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), as initially described, is done with cephalad traction on the gallbladder. We hypothesized LC exposure technique narrows the angle between the cystic and hepatic ducts, placing them at increased risk of injury.
METHODS: Twenty-three patients had routine LC. Cystic duct cholangiography (IOC) was done with a flexible 5-Fr catheter via a percutaneous introducer placed anterior to the gallbladder. Exposure of Calot's triangle was maintained with cephalad traction on the gallbladder fundus. IOC was repeated after allowing the organ to assume the anatomic position. The cholangiograms were inspected for significant differences, and the angle of the cystic to the hepatic duct (CDHD) was measured by a blinded radiologist.
RESULTS: The mean angle of the cystic to hepatic duct was 30 degrees +/- 19 degrees in the IOCs taken with cephalad traction on the gallbladder fundus vs 59 degrees +/- 22 degrees, P < 0.001, in the cholangiograms taken without traction. A filling defect at the cystic-hepatic duct junction was present in 39% of IOC taken with traction vs none without traction. The intrahepatic ducts were seen in all films without traction, whereas the intrahepatic ducts were not visualized in 13% of IOCs taken with traction.
CONCLUSIONS: From these data we conclude (1) extra-hepatic biliary ducts may be at increased risk of injury during LC because of the exposure technique and (2) imaging bile ducts in the anatomic position may convey misleading information about the relative location of important structures. Optimal exposure for dissection of Calot's triangle should utilize a second clamp on the infundibulum with lateral, caudal traction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8711604     DOI: 10.1007/s004649910010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  13 in total

1.  Avoidance of bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  J G Hunter
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Surgical rates and operative mortality for open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Maryland.

Authors:  C A Steiner; E B Bass; M A Talamini; H A Pitt; E P Steinberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-02-10       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  H R Bernard; T W Hartman
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 4.  Laparoscopic anatomy of the biliary tree.

Authors:  D W Crist; T R Gadacz
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 2.741

5.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The new 'gold standard'?

Authors:  N J Soper; P T Stockmann; D L Dunnegan; S W Ashley
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1992-08

6.  Mechanisms of major biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  A M Davidoff; T N Pappas; E A Murray; D J Hilleren; R D Johnson; M E Baker; G E Newman; P B Cotton; W C Meyers
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  A comparison of outcome and cost of open vs. laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  R C McIntyre; M A Zoeter; K C Weil; M M Cohen
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Surg       Date:  1992-06

8.  Multipractice analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 1,983 patients.

Authors:  G M Larson; G C Vitale; J Casey; J S Evans; G Gilliam; L Heuser; G McGee; M Rao; M J Scherm; C R Voyles
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Increased cholecystectomy rate after the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  A P Legorreta; J H Silber; G N Costantino; R W Kobylinski; S L Zatz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993 Sep 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Diagnosis and management of biliary complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  N J Soper; M W Flye; L M Brunt; P T Stockmann; G A Sicard; D Picus; S A Edmundowicz; G Aliperti
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 2.565

View more
  4 in total

1.  Liver retraction techniques for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  W G Ainslie; M Larvin; I G Martin; M J McMahon
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Bile duct injuries at laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a single-institution prospective study. Acute cholecystitis indicates an increased risk.

Authors:  Claes Söderlund; Farshad Frozanpor; Stefan Linder
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Laparoscopic retrograde (fundus first) cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Michael D Kelly
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  Role of intraoperative cholangiography in detecting rare bile duct anomalies.

Authors:  Gabi Wazz; Frank Branicki; Imran Chishti; Hakam Taji
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2002 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.