Literature DB >> 8709351

Randomized, prospective, controlled study comparing radical prostatectomy alone and neoadjuvant androgen withdrawal in the treatment of localized prostate cancer. Canadian Urologic Oncology Group.

S L Goldenberg1, L H Klotz, J Srigley, M A Jewett, D Mador, Y Fradet, J Barkin, J Chin, J M Paquin, M J Bullock, S Laplante.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A prospective, multicenter, randomized study was done to test the hypothesis that neoadjuvant androgen withdrawal decreases the incidence of positive margins following radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Observations were made of 213 patients randomized to undergo radical prostatectomy alone (101) or to receive a 12-week course of 300 mg. cyproterone acetate daily followed by surgery (112). Groups were similar at baseline in terms of clinical stage, serum prostate specific antigen and Gleason score. Of 192 patients available for efficacy analysis 9 had stage T1b, 8 stage T1c, 63 stage T2a, 36 stage T2b and 76 stage T2c disease.
RESULTS: One or more positive surgical margins were found in 59 of 91 patients (64.8%) in the surgery only group compared to 28 of 101 (27.7%) in the cyproterone acetate group (p = 0.001). Patients who received preoperative therapy had a statistically significantly lower rate of apical margin involvement than those who did not (17.8 versus 47.8%, respectively, p < 0.0001). There was no statistically significant difference in surgical (p = 0.8645) or postoperative (p = 0.173) complications between the 2 groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant androgen withdrawal with a 12-week course of 300 mg. cyproterone acetate daily results in a lower rate of positive margins without adversely affecting postoperative recovery. The impact on patient survival will be determined by long-term followup.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8709351

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  31 in total

Review 1.  [Significance of neoadjuvant therapy before radical prostatectomy].

Authors:  R Paul; H Van Randenborgh; H Kübler; M Alschibaja; R Hartung
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Phase 2 study of neoadjuvant docetaxel plus bevacizumab in patients with high-risk localized prostate cancer: a Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Consortium trial.

Authors:  Robert W Ross; Matthew D Galsky; Phil Febbo; Marc Barry; Jerome P Richie; Wanling Xie; Fiona M Fennessy; Rupal S Bhatt; Julia Hayes; Toni K Choueiri; Clare M Tempany; Philip W Kantoff; Mary E Taplin; William K Oh
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Comparative study of the impact of 3- versus 8-month neoadjuvant hormonal therapy on outcome of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Xiao-Yong Pu; Xing-Huan Wang; Yi-Long Wu; Huai-Peng Wang
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-04-25       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 4.  Prostate cancer: 6. Surgical treatment of localized disease.

Authors:  S L Goldenberg; E W Ramsey; M A Jewett
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-11-17       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 5.  Prostate cancer: 5. Diagnostic tools for early detection.

Authors:  P I Karakiewicz; A G Aprikian
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-11-03       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy preceding radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: early postoperative complications and biochemical recurrence.

Authors:  Seung Woo Yang; Ki Hak Song; Jae Sung Lim; Chong Koo Sul
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2011-01-24

Review 7.  Pathological changes in prostate lesions after androgen manipulation.

Authors:  R Montironi; C C Schulman
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Response of the insulin-like growth factor (IGF) system to IGF-IR inhibition and androgen deprivation in a neoadjuvant prostate cancer trial: effects of obesity and androgen deprivation.

Authors:  James P Dean; Cynthia C Sprenger; Junxiang Wan; Kathleen Haugk; William J Ellis; Daniel W Lin; John M Corman; Bruce L Dalkin; Elahe Mostaghel; Peter S Nelson; Pinchas Cohen; Bruce Montgomery; Stephen R Plymate
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 5.958

9.  Effects of complete androgen blockade for 12 and 24 weeks on the pathological stage and resection margin status of prostate cancer.

Authors:  C Selli; R Montironi; A Bono; F Pagano; F Zattoni; A Manganelli; F P Selvaggi; G Comeri; G Fiaccavento; S Guazzieri; A Lembo; S Cosciani-Cunico; D Potenzoni; G Muto; R Mazzucchelli; A Santinelli
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 10.  Is there a role for chemotherapy in prostate cancer?

Authors:  C M Canil; I F Tannock
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-09-13       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.