Literature DB >> 12101195

Effects of complete androgen blockade for 12 and 24 weeks on the pathological stage and resection margin status of prostate cancer.

C Selli1, R Montironi, A Bono, F Pagano, F Zattoni, A Manganelli, F P Selvaggi, G Comeri, G Fiaccavento, S Guazzieri, A Lembo, S Cosciani-Cunico, D Potenzoni, G Muto, R Mazzucchelli, A Santinelli.   

Abstract

AIMS: To compare the pathological stage and surgical margin status in patients undergoing either immediate radical prostatectomy or 12 and 24 weeks of neoadjuvant hormonal treatment (NHT) in a prospective, randomised study.
METHODS: Whole mount sections of 393 radical prostatectomy specimens were evaluated: 128 patients had immediate surgery, 143 were treated for 12 weeks and 122 for 24 weeks with complete androgen blockade.
RESULTS: Histopathology revealed organ confined tumours in 40.4% of patients with clinical stage B disease in the immediate surgery group, whereas 12 and 24 weeks of NHT increased the number of organ confined tumours to 54.6% and 64.8%, respectively. Among patients with clinical stage C tumours, pathological staging found organ confined disease in 10.4%, 31.4%, and 61.2% in the immediate surgery, 12 weeks of NHT, and 24 weeks of NHT groups, respectively. Preoperative NHT caused a significant decrease in positive margins both in patients with clinical stage B and C disease. The extent of margin involvement was not influenced by preoperative treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant androgenic suppression is effective in reducing both the pathological stage and the positive margin rate in patients with stage B and C prostatic cancer undergoing radical surgery. Some beneficial effects are evident in those patients treated for 24 weeks, and it is reasonable to assume that the optimal duration of NHT is longer than three months.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12101195      PMCID: PMC1769701          DOI: 10.1136/jcp.55.7.508

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0021-9746            Impact factor:   3.411


  19 in total

1.  Randomized comparative study of 3 versus 8-month neoadjuvant hormonal therapy before radical prostatectomy: biochemical and pathological effects.

Authors:  M E Gleave; S L Goldenberg; J L Chin; J Warner; F Saad; L H Klotz; M Jewett; V Kassabian; M Chetner; C Dupont; S Van Rensselaer
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  4-Year follow-up results of a European prospective randomized study on neoadjuvant hormonal therapy prior to radical prostatectomy in T2-3N0M0 prostate cancer. European Study Group on Neoadjuvant Treatment of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  C C Schulman; F M Debruyne; G Forster; F P Selvaggi; A R Zlotta; W P Witjes
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  Randomized, prospective, controlled study comparing radical prostatectomy alone and neoadjuvant androgen withdrawal in the treatment of localized prostate cancer. Canadian Urologic Oncology Group.

Authors:  S L Goldenberg; L H Klotz; J Srigley; M A Jewett; D Mador; Y Fradet; J Barkin; J Chin; J M Paquin; M J Bullock; S Laplante
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Update on Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center studies of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  W R Fair; J E Betancourt
Journal:  Mol Urol       Date:  2000

5.  Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy before radical prostatectomy decreases the number of positive surgical margins in stage T2 prostate cancer: interim results of a prospective randomized trial. The Belgian Uro-Oncological Study Group.

Authors:  H Van Poppel; D De Ridder; A A Elgamal; W Van de Voorde; P Werbrouck; K Ackaert; R Oyen; G Pittomvils; L Baert
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Randomized prospective study comparing radical prostatectomy alone versus radical prostatectomy preceded by androgen blockade in clinical stage B2 (T2bNxM0) prostate cancer. The Lupron Depot Neoadjuvant Prostate Cancer Study Group.

Authors:  M S Soloway; R Sharifi; Z Wajsman; D McLeod; D P Wood; A Puras-Baez
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Therapy of prostatic cancer and histopathologic follow-up.

Authors:  G Dhom; S Degro
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 4.104

8.  Randomized study of neoadjuvant testicular androgen ablation therapy before radical prostatectomy in men with clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  B L Dalkin; F R Ahmann; R Nagle; C S Johnson
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Biochemical and pathological effects of 8 months of neoadjuvant androgen withdrawal therapy before radical prostatectomy in patients with clinically confined prostate cancer.

Authors:  M E Gleave; S L Goldenberg; E C Jones; N Bruchovsky; L D Sullivan
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Impact of radical prostatectomy in the management of clinically localized disease.

Authors:  D F Paulson
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  15 in total

1.  [Regressive changes after short-term neoadjuvant antihormonal therapy in prostatic carcinoma: the value of Gleason grading].

Authors:  R Grobholz; A Riester; C G Sauer; M Siegsmund
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.011

2.  Macrocryosectioning and complete sampling of the prostate in a potential multiorgan donor candidate.

Authors:  Roberta Mazzucchelli; Marina Scarpelli; Antonio Lopez-Beltran; Liang Cheng; Rodolfo Montironi
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  A Novel System for Estimating Residual Disease and Pathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Treatment of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Claire Murphy; Lawrence True; Funda Vakar-Lopez; Jing Xia; Roman Gulati; Bruce Montgomery; Maria Tretiakova
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 4.104

Review 4.  Use of androgen deprivation therapy in prostate cancer: indications and prevalence.

Authors:  Roisin M Connolly; Michael A Carducci; Emmanuel S Antonarakis
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 3.285

5.  Post prostatectomy outcomes of patients with high-risk prostate cancer treated with neoadjuvant androgen blockade.

Authors:  Rana R McKay; Bruce Montgomery; Wanling Xie; Zhenwei Zhang; Glenn J Bubley; David W Lin; Mark A Preston; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Peter Chang; Andrew A Wagner; Elahe A Mostaghel; Philip W Kantoff; Peter S Nelson; Adam S Kibel; Mary-Ellen Taplin
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 5.554

6.  Morphologic characterization of preoperatively treated prostate cancer: toward a post-therapy histologic classification.

Authors:  Eleni Efstathiou; Neil A Abrahams; Rita F Tibbs; Xuemei Wang; Curtis A Pettaway; Louis L Pisters; Paul F Mathew; Kim-Anh Do; Christopher J Logothetis; Patricia Troncoso
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2009-10-17       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 7.  Neoadjuvant therapy for localized prostate cancer: Examining mechanism of action and efficacy within the tumor.

Authors:  David Y Lou; Lawrence Fong
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2014-02-02       Impact factor: 3.498

Review 8.  Rationale for and review of neoadjuvant therapy prior to radical prostatectomy for patients with high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Rana R McKay; Toni K Choueiri; Mary-Ellen Taplin
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 9.  Neo-adjuvant and adjuvant hormone therapy for localised and locally advanced prostate cancer.

Authors:  S Kumar; M Shelley; C Harrison; B Coles; T J Wilt; M D Mason
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-10-18

10.  Neoadjuvant hormone therapy for patients with high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wen Liu; Yu Yao; Xue Liu; Yong Liu; Gui-Ming Zhang
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2021 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.285

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.