Literature DB >> 8709059

When can elderly patients be excluded from discussing resuscitation?

K Stewart1, A Wagg, M Kinirons.   

Abstract

Case notes of elderly medical patients were surveyed to determine when "do not resuscitate' (DNR) decisions could legitimately be made without consulting them. Patients were thought to be suitable for exclusion from decisions if morbidity scores indicated that they were unlikely to survive cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) or if they were mentally incompetent. Thirty per cent of all patients were predicted not to survive CPR; another 28% were deemed incompetent. Of those with DNR decisions, 59% were predicted not to survive and a further 24% were incompetent. Discussing resuscitation would have been appropriate with 17% of those with DNR decisions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8709059      PMCID: PMC5401517     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Coll Physicians Lond        ISSN: 0035-8819


  9 in total

1.  Evaluation of a mental test score for assessment of mental impairment in the elderly.

Authors:  H M Hodkinson
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  1972-11       Impact factor: 10.668

2.  Withholding cardiopulmonary resuscitation: proposals for formal guidelines.

Authors:  L Doyal; D Wilsher
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-06-12

3.  Decisions about cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Authors:  D Florin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-06-25

4.  Prediction of failure to survive following in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation: comparison of two predictive instruments.

Authors:  S O'Keeffe; M H Ebell
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 5.262

Review 5.  Review: patient-related predictors of cardiopulmonary resuscitation of hospitalized patients.

Authors:  P L Dautzenberg; T C Broekman; C Hooyer; R S Schonwetter; S A Duursma
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 10.668

6.  Withholding and withdrawing life sustaining treatment from elderly people: towards formal guidelines.

Authors:  L Doyal; D Wilsher
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-06-25

7.  Living wills: would sick people change their minds?

Authors:  J M Potter; D Stewart; G Duncan
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 2.401

8.  Cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the elderly: patients' and relatives' views.

Authors:  G E Mead; C J Turnbull
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.903

9.  The views of elderly patients and their relatives on cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Authors:  J Liddle; C Gilleard; A Neil
Journal:  J R Coll Physicians Lond       Date:  1994 May-Jun
  9 in total
  3 in total

1.  CPR decision-making by elderly patients.

Authors:  M Bacon; K Stewart; L Bowker
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 2.  Resuscitation decisions in the elderly: a discussion of current thinking.

Authors:  P N Bruce-Jones
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 3.  Determining resuscitation preferences of elderly inpatients: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Christopher Frank; Daren K Heyland; Benjamin Chen; Donald Farquhar; Kathryn Myers; Ken Iwaasa
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2003-10-14       Impact factor: 8.262

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.