Literature DB >> 8025466

Withholding and withdrawing life sustaining treatment from elderly people: towards formal guidelines.

L Doyal1, D Wilsher.   

Abstract

Clinicians often decide either to withhold or to withdraw lifesaving treatment in elderly patients. Considerable disagreement exists about the circumstances in which such actions can be defended. Debates about the scarcity of resources in the NHS add urgency to the need to resolve this disagreement. Competent elderly patients have a legal and moral right to decide whether to receive life sustaining treatment. Such treatment should not be withheld or withdrawn on the basis of a patient's age alone. Principles for making decisions about life sustaining treatment in incompetent elderly patients can be defended and should exist as written guidelines.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Analytical Approach; Death and Euthanasia

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8025466      PMCID: PMC2540653          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.308.6945.1689

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  5 in total

1.  Validity of cerebral arterial blood flow calculations from velocity measurements.

Authors:  H A Kontos
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 7.914

2.  Withholding cardiopulmonary resuscitation: proposals for formal guidelines.

Authors:  L Doyal; D Wilsher
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-06-12

3.  Medical futility in context.

Authors:  F Williams
Journal:  Br J Hosp Med       Date:  1993 Jun 16-Jul 13

Review 4.  Long term social adjustment after treatment for childhood cancer.

Authors:  C Eiser; T Havermans
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 3.791

5.  Hospice approach to the treatment of patients with advanced dementia of the Alzheimer type.

Authors:  L Volicer; Y Rheaume; J Brown; K Fabiszewski; R Brady
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1986 Oct 24-31       Impact factor: 56.272

  5 in total
  9 in total

1.  What investigations and procedures do patients in hospices want. Providing ineffective treatment is futile.

Authors:  R Morgan; D King
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-04-11

Review 2.  Discussing cardiopulmonary resuscitation with patients and relatives.

Authors:  K Stewart
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 2.401

3.  Advance directives.

Authors:  L Doyal
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-03-11

4.  Decisions about cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Authors:  D Florin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-06-25

5.  Euthanasia. Natural and unnatural death.

Authors:  A Fergusson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-08-13

6.  Decisions to treat or not to treat pneumonia in demented psychogeriatric nursing home patients: development of a guideline.

Authors:  J T van der Steen; M T Muller; M E Ooms; G van der Wal; M W Ribbe
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.903

7.  A comparison of the willingness of resident and attending physicians to comply with the requests of patients at the end of life.

Authors:  John M Thomas; John R O'Leary; Terri R Fried
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  When can elderly patients be excluded from discussing resuscitation?

Authors:  K Stewart; A Wagg; M Kinirons
Journal:  J R Coll Physicians Lond       Date:  1996 Mar-Apr

9.  Attitudes and behaviors of Japanese physicians concerning withholding and withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment for end-of-life patients: results from an Internet survey.

Authors:  Seiji Bito; Atsushi Asai
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2007-06-19       Impact factor: 2.652

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.