Literature DB >> 8703650

Comparative wheal and flare study of mizolastine vs terfenadine, cetirizine, loratadine and placebo in healthy volunteers.

P Rosenzweig1, H Caplain, S Chaufour, N Ulliac, M J Cabanis, J J Thebault.   

Abstract

1. Mizolastine, a new benzimidazole derivative with potent selective, non-sedative H1-histamine antagonist activity was compared with terfenadine, cetirizine and loratadine using the histamine-induced wheal and flare model in healthy volunteers. 2. Study design was a five way double-blind crossover design using a single dose of mizolastine 10 mg, terfenadine 120 mg, cetirizine 10 mg, loratadine 10 mg and placebo. 3. Histamine tests were performed on 10 occasions up to +24 h after dosing using an intradermal injection of histamine 2 micrograms with concommittant contralateral injection of a saline control. 4. Mizolastine, terfenadine, cetirizine and loratadine significantly (P < 0.001 vs placebo) inhibited the wheal and flare formation starting 1 to 2 h after dosing up to 24 h after dosing. 5. Mizolastine was significantly more active than loratadine on the wheal (P < 0.01) and flare (P < 0.05) inhibition from 3 up to 6 and 8 h respectively, as active as terfenadine on both parameters and as active as cetirizine on wheal inhibition while less active (P < 0.01) than cetirizine on flare inhibition at 2 and 12 h post-dosing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8703650      PMCID: PMC1365192     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  9 in total

1.  A double-blind, single-dose, crossover comparison of cetirizine, terfenadine, loratadine, astemizole, and chlorpheniramine versus placebo: suppressive effects on histamine-induced wheals and flares during 24 hours in normal subjects.

Authors:  F E Simons; J L McMillan; K J Simons
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 10.793

2.  The basis of the histamine assay in skin.

Authors:  H Byrom; M Clark; V White; D W Vere
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Inhibitory activity of terfenadine on histamine-induced skin wheals in man.

Authors:  K J Hüther; G Renftle; N Barraud; J T Burke; J Koch-Weser
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1977-11-14       Impact factor: 2.953

4.  Effects of loratadine (SCH 29851) in suppression of histamine-induced skin wheals.

Authors:  N Kassem; I Roman; R Gural; J G Dyer; N Robillard
Journal:  Ann Allergy       Date:  1988-06

5.  Lack of interaction between a new antihistamine, mizolastine, and lorazepam on psychomotor performance and memory in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  A Patat; M C Perault; B Vandel; N Ulliac; I Zieleniuk; P Rosenzweig
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of mizolastine (SL 85.0324), a new nonsedative H1 antihistamine.

Authors:  P Rosenzweig; J J Thebault; H Caplain; C Dubruc; G Bianchetti; E Fuseau; P L Morselli
Journal:  Ann Allergy       Date:  1992-08

7.  Histamine weal formation and absorption in man.

Authors:  J Cook; S Shuster
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 8.739

8.  Assessment of the anticholinergic effect of the new antihistamine mizolastine in healthy subjects.

Authors:  P Danjou; P Molinier; I Berlin; A Patat; P Rosenzweig; P L Morselli
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 4.335

9.  Effects of mizolastine and clemastine on actual driving and psychomotor performance in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  E F Vuurman; M M Uiterwijk; P Rosenzweig; J F O'Hanlon
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.953

  9 in total
  9 in total

1.  Comparative activity of cetirizine and mizolastine on histamine-induced skin wheal and flare responses at 24 h.

Authors:  A Purohit; M Mélac; G Pauli; N Frossard
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Second-generation antihistamines: a comparative review.

Authors:  J W Slater; A D Zechnich; D G Haxby
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  Clinical pharmacology of new histamine H1 receptor antagonists.

Authors:  F E Simons; K J Simons
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 4.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of mizolastine.

Authors:  B Lebrun-Vignes; B Diquet; O Chosidow
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 5.  Chronic urticaria: aetiology, management and current and future treatment options.

Authors:  Martina M A Kozel; Ruth A Sabroe
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Cetirizine: a review of its use in allergic disorders.

Authors:  Monique P Curran; Lesley J Scott; Caroline M Perry
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling of the antihistaminic (H1) effect of bilastine.

Authors:  Nerea Jauregizar; Leire de la Fuente; Maria Luisa Lucero; Ander Sologuren; Nerea Leal; Mónica Rodríguez
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 6.447

8.  Lack of interaction between two antihistamines, mizolastine and cetirizine, and ethanol in psychomotor and driving performance in healthy subjects.

Authors:  A Patat; D Stubbs; C Dunmore; N Ulliac; B Sexton; I Zieleniuk; A Irving; W Jones
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.953

9.  Predicting and establishing the clinical efficacy of a histamine h(1)-receptor antagonist : desloratadine, the model paradigm.

Authors:  Glenis Scadding
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.859

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.