Literature DB >> 7589029

Lack of interaction between two antihistamines, mizolastine and cetirizine, and ethanol in psychomotor and driving performance in healthy subjects.

A Patat1, D Stubbs, C Dunmore, N Ulliac, B Sexton, I Zieleniuk, A Irving, W Jones.   

Abstract

The pharmacodynamic interaction between mizolastine, a new H1 antihistamine, and ethanol was assessed in a randomized, double-blind, three-way crossover, placebo-controlled study. Eighteen healthy young male volunteers received mizolastine 10 mg, or cetirizine 10 mg or placebo once daily for 7 days with a 1-week wash-out interval. An oral dose of ethanol or ethanol placebo, given 2 h after dosing on days 5 or 7 of each treatment period, was administered to achieve a peak blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of 0.7 g/l then maintained for 1 h by two further doses of ethanol. Driving ability and psychomotor performance were evaluated using actual and simulated driving tests, critical flicker fusion threshold (CFF), adaptive tracking and divided attention (DAT) tasks. Ethanol produced a significant decrement in all tasks up to 5.5 h after administration: an increase in steering movements of 4.6, in lateral deviation of 0.45 m, in braking reaction time of 80 ms, in driving test and DAT performance of + 3.2; and a decrease in CFF and in tracking speed of 2.6 m.s-1. Neither mizolastine nor cetirizine significantly impaired driving ability or arousal (CFF) compared with the placebo. However, both drugs significantly impaired DAT performance 6:00 h post-dose (increase of + 2.1 for mizolastine and + 2.4 for cetirizine). The tracking speed was significantly decreased 7:50 h after mizolastine administration (-1.3 m.s-1) and more consistently from 1:30 to 7:50 h after cetirizine administration (-1.4 m.s-1). No significant adverse interaction, i.e. potentiation, occurred between ethanol and either antihistamine.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7589029     DOI: 10.1007/BF00192740

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0031-6970            Impact factor:   2.953


  32 in total

1.  Visual motor co-ordination and dynamic visual acuity.

Authors:  R G Borland; A N Nicholson
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Skills performance at low blood alcohol levels.

Authors:  H Moskowitz; M M Burns; A F Williams
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol       Date:  1985-11

3.  Comparative wheal and flare study of mizolastine vs terfenadine, cetirizine, loratadine and placebo in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  P Rosenzweig; H Caplain; S Chaufour; N Ulliac; M J Cabanis; J J Thebault
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  The psychomotor and cognitive effects of a new antihistamine, mizolastine, compared to terfenadine, triprolidine and placebo in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  J S Kerr; C Dunmore; I Hindmarch
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  Performance studies with the H1-histamine receptor antagonists, astemizole and terfenadine.

Authors:  A N Nicholson; B M Stone
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  Lack of interaction between a new antihistamine, mizolastine, and lorazepam on psychomotor performance and memory in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  A Patat; M C Perault; B Vandel; N Ulliac; I Zieleniuk; P Rosenzweig
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.335

7.  Effects of loratadine and cetirizine on actual driving and psychometric test performance, and EEG during driving.

Authors:  J G Ramaekers; M M Uiterwijk; J F O'Hanlon
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.953

8.  Lack of pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interactions of the antihistamine ebastine with ethanol in healthy subjects.

Authors:  M J Mattila; T Kuitunen; Y Plétan
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.953

9.  Lack of potentiation by cetirizine of alcohol-induced psychomotor disturbances.

Authors:  M Doms; G Vanhulle; Y Baelde; P Coulie; P Dupont; J P Rihoux
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.953

10.  Effects of mizolastine and clemastine on actual driving and psychomotor performance in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  E F Vuurman; M M Uiterwijk; P Rosenzweig; J F O'Hanlon
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.953

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  New insights into the second generation antihistamines.

Authors:  G M Walsh; L Annunziato; N Frossard; K Knol; S Levander; J M Nicolas; M Taglialatela; M D Tharp; J P Tillement; H Timmerman
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Pharmacodynamic interactions of a solid formulation of sodium oxybate and ethanol in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Nathalie Pross; Alain Patat; Philippe Vivet; Michelle Bidaut; Nicolas Fauchoux
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Histamine H1 receptor antagonist cetirizine impairs working memory processing speed, but not episodic memory.

Authors:  P van Ruitenbeek; A Vermeeren; W J Riedel
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 4.  Second-generation antihistamines: actions and efficacy in the management of allergic disorders.

Authors:  Larry K Golightly; Leon S Greos
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 5.  Comparative tolerability of second generation antihistamines.

Authors:  F Horak; U P Stübner
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 6.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of mizolastine.

Authors:  B Lebrun-Vignes; B Diquet; O Chosidow
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 7.  Pharmacokinetic interactions between alcohol and other drugs.

Authors:  A G Fraser
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 8.  Impact of allergic rhinitis treatment on quality of life.

Authors:  A Tripathi; R Patterson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.981

9.  Cetirizine: a review of its use in allergic disorders.

Authors:  Monique P Curran; Lesley J Scott; Caroline M Perry
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 9.546

10.  Lack of effect of single and repeated doses of levocetirizine, a new antihistamine drug, on cognitive and psychomotor functions in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  J M Gandon; H Allain
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.335

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.