Literature DB >> 8703453

The effect of laryngeal mask cuff pressure on postoperative sore throat incidence.

G Burgard1, T Möllhoff, T Prien.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of laryngeal mask airway (LMA) cuff pressure on the incidence of postoperative sore throat.
DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, observational study.
SETTING: Operating room of a university hospital. PATIENTS: 200 consecutive adult patients requiring anesthesia for gynecologic procedures.
INTERVENTIONS: Anesthesia was induced with thiopental 3-5 mg/kg, fentanyl 2 micrograms/kg, vecuronium bromide 0.05mg/kg, and enflurane 0.8% to 2% and maintained with nitrous oxide and oxygen (65%/35%) and enflurane.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In Group 1, cuff pressure measurement was continuously performed until the end of the operation. In Group 2, 5 minutes after induction of anesthesia and 2 minutes after insertion of the LMA, cuff pressure was also continuously observed and reduced to the minimal pressure required for airtightness. In the recovery room, after the operation, patients were questioned for postoperative sore throat 4, 8, and 24 hours after the operation following a scoring protocol (score 0 = no complaints, score 1 = minimal sore throat, score 2 = moderate sore throat, score 3 = severe sore throat: "never a LMA again". Continuous monitoring of cuff pressure revealed a steady increase of pressure (during the first 60 minutes increases of 43 cm H2O) in Group 1. In Group 2, after release of air, cuff pressures were significantly lower through the entire operation when compared with Group 1. In Group 1, 8 patients claimed to have a sore throat (Score 1, n = 4; Score 2, n = 3; Score 3, n = 1). In Group 2, no patient complained of sore throat.
CONCLUSIONS: A significant increase in cuff pressure is seen during the first 60 minutes. Three minutes after insertion of the laryngeal mask, cuff pressure can significantly be reduced without any major gas leakage. Postoperative sore throat can be reduced when cuff pressure is continuously monitored and kept on low-pressure values.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8703453     DOI: 10.1016/0952-8180(95)00229-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Anesth        ISSN: 0952-8180            Impact factor:   9.452


  33 in total

1.  [Comparison of two different laryngeal mask models for airway management in patients with immobilization of the cervical spine].

Authors:  C Gernoth; O Jandewerth; M Contzen; J Hinkelbein; H Genzwürker
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 2.  [Laryngeal masks. Possibilities and limits].

Authors:  H Hillebrand; J Motsch
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  Comparison of Two Different Sizes of Endotracheal Tracheal Tube for Postoperative Sore Throat in Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Surgeries.

Authors:  Sadia Ali; Ahsun Khan; Allah Ditta Ashfaq
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-01-25

4.  The effect of esophagogastroduodenoscopy probe insertion on the intracuff pressure of airway devices in children during general anesthesia.

Authors:  Onur Balaban; Mineto Kamata; Mumin Hakim; Dmitry Tumin; Joseph D Tobias
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 2.078

5.  Effect of Intravenous Hydrocortisone on Preventing Postoperative Sore Throat Followed by Laryngeal Mask Airway Use in patients Undergoing Urogenital Surgeries.

Authors:  Mahmood Eydi; Khosro Kolahdouzan; Samad Ej Golzari
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Thorac Res       Date:  2013-03-13

6.  [Continuous cuff pressure measurement during laryngeal mask anesthesia : An obligatory measure to avoid postoperative complications].

Authors:  M Hensel; T Güldenpfennig; A Schmidt; M Krumm
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 1.041

7.  Does cuff pressure monitoring reduce postoperative pharyngolaryngeal adverse events after LMA-ProSeal insertion? A parallel group randomised trial.

Authors:  R Vasanth Karthik; Priya Ranganathan; Atul P Kulkarni; Kailash S Sharma
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 2.078

8.  [Laryngeal tube versus laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetised non-paralysed patientsA comparison of handling and postoperative morbidity].

Authors:  M Wrobel; U Grundmann; W Wilhelm; S Wagner; R Larsen
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.041

9.  Clinical application of limiting laryngeal mask airway cuff pressures utilizing inflating syringe intrinsic recoil.

Authors:  David M Corda; Christopher B Robards; Mark J Rice; Timothy E Morey; Nikolaus Gravenstein; Terrie Vasilopoulos; Sorin J Brull
Journal:  Rom J Anaesth Intensive Care       Date:  2018-04

10.  Comparison of Different Cuff Pressure Use with the Supreme Laryngeal Mask Airway on Haemodynamic Response, Seal Pressure and Postoperative Adverse Events: A Prospective Randomized Study.

Authors:  Achmet Ali; Demet Altun; Nukhet Sivrikoz; Mesut Yornuk; Namigar Turgut; İbrahim Özkan Akıncı
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2017-11-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.