Literature DB >> 29744251

Comparison of Different Cuff Pressure Use with the Supreme Laryngeal Mask Airway on Haemodynamic Response, Seal Pressure and Postoperative Adverse Events: A Prospective Randomized Study.

Achmet Ali1, Demet Altun1, Nukhet Sivrikoz1, Mesut Yornuk1, Namigar Turgut2, İbrahim Özkan Akıncı1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The Supreme™ laryngeal mask airway (SLMA) is a supra glottic airway (SGA) device that is used as an alternative to endotracheal tubes. In the present study, we aimed to compare the use of the SLMA with normal cuff pressure and low cuff pressure, primarily for haemodynamic response.
METHODS: In the present study, 120 patients diagnosed with hypertension and scheduled for varicose vein or inguinal hernia operation were enrolled and 99 patients finished. Using randomization, patients were divided into two groups according to cuff pressure as a low-pressure group (Group L, 45 cm H2O) and a normal-pressure group (Group N, 60 cm H2O). Demographics, Mallampati score and the type and duration of surgery, heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), percentage of tidal volume leakage, Ppeak, Pmean, etCO2, seal pressure, fibreoptic scores and postoperative adverse effects of all patients were recorded.
RESULTS: MAP and HR values immediately and 2 minutes after SLMA insertion were significantly lower in Group L (p<0.001). In Group L and Group N, the seal pressures were 24.1±3.1 cm H2O and 26.2±3.9 cm H2O, respectively (p=0.003). Also, blood staining and sore throat occurred less frequently in Group L (p<0.05). The fibreoptic average score, insertion features and ventilation parameters were similar between the groups (p>0.05).
CONCLUSION: SLMA use with a cuff pressure of 45 cm H2O significantly decreases haemodynamic response and post-operative side effects compared with a normal cuff pressure. Therefore, except for some specific surgeries that require higher seal pressures, we recommend the use of the SLMA with cuff pressures as low as 45 cm H2O.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laryngeal mask airway supreme; cuff pressure; general anaesthesia; haemodynamic response; seal pressure

Year:  2017        PMID: 29744251      PMCID: PMC5937462          DOI: 10.5152/TJAR.2017.89587

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim        ISSN: 2149-276X


  25 in total

1.  A comparison of the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal and the laryngeal tube airway in paralyzed anesthetized adult patients undergoing pressure-controlled ventilation.

Authors:  Joseph Brimacombe; Christian Keller; Lawrence Brimacombe
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.108

2.  Haemodynamic response to tracheal intubation via intubating laryngeal mask airway versus direct laryngoscopic tracheal intubation.

Authors:  Naveed Tahir Siddiqui; Fazal Hameed Khan
Journal:  J Pak Med Assoc       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 0.781

3.  The LMA Supreme--a pilot study.

Authors:  A van Zundert; J Brimacombe
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 6.955

4.  Reducing the incidence of sore throat with the laryngeal mask airway.

Authors:  M R Nott; P D Noble; M Parmar
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Effects of thiopentone, etomidate and propofol on the haemodynamic response to tracheal intubation.

Authors:  C E Harris; A M Murray; J M Anderson; R M Grounds; M Morgan
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 6.955

6.  Plasma catecholamine responses to tracheal intubation.

Authors:  D R Derbyshire; A Chmielewski; D Fell; M Vater; K Achola; G Smith
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 9.166

7.  Oropharyngeal leak pressure with the laryngeal mask airway Supreme™ at different intracuff pressures: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Lianfeng Zhang; Edwin Seet; Vanita Mehta; Rajeev Subramanyam; Saravanan P Ankichetty; David T Wong; Frances Chung
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2011-04-30       Impact factor: 5.063

8.  LMA-Supreme--a new single-use LMA with gastric access: a report on its clinical efficacy.

Authors:  C Verghese; B Ramaswamy
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 9.166

9.  Prospective clinical and fiberoptic evaluation of the Supreme laryngeal mask airway.

Authors:  Arnd Timmermann; Stefan Cremer; Christoph Eich; Stephan Kazmaier; Anselm Bräuer; Bernhard M Graf; Sebastian G Russo
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 7.892

10.  Comparison of the LMA-ProSeal and LMA-Classic in children.

Authors:  H Shimbori; K Ono; T Miwa; N Morimura; M Noguchi; K Hiroki
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2004-08-06       Impact factor: 9.166

View more
  2 in total

1.  Incidence of postoperative sore throat after using a new technique of insertion of a second generation Laryngeal Mask Airway: A randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Xiaoxiao Li; Xiuli Wang; Ye Zhao; Zhenfei Jiang; Xueli Lv; Xinrui Nie; Tong Li; Xinghe Wang; Lingyun Dai; Su Liu
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 4.183

2.  Evaluation of gender differences in postoperative sore throat and hoarseness following the use of Ambu AuraGain laryngeal mask: the randomised controlled LadyLAMA trial study protocol.

Authors:  Katharina Epp; Uli Przybylski; Carla Luz; Marc Kriege; Eva Wittenmeier; Irene Schmidtmann; Nina Pirlich
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 2.692

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.