Literature DB >> 8703153

Laparoscopic surgery in a small animal model. A simplified technique of retroperitoneal dissection in the rat.

B A Sandoval1, T T Sulaiman, A V Robinson, T A Stellato.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An adequate laparoscopic small-animal model would benefit surgical oncologic research. Immunobiologic data and reagents available for the rodent make them an ideal species. We developed a simple, inexpensive, reproducible technique for laparoscopic surgery in rodents.
METHODS: Carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum is achieved in anesthetized animals. Through a 0.5-cm midline incision a 4.8-mm bronchofiberscope is inserted into the peritoneal cavity and secured with a purse-string suture (PSS). Three additional PSSs are made to introduce the dissectors. Under fiberscopic vision, a blunt dissection of the retroperitoneum exposes the inferior vena cava and aorta. Necropsy 24 h after verifies the adequacy of dissection.
RESULTS: Eighteen animals survived. The only death resulted from bleeding. Mortality was 5.26%. Surgical time was 24.72 +/- 8.93 min with all animals active 2 h postlaparoscopy.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic surgery (LS) can be done inexpensively without sophisticated equipment. The rodent is ideal for examining the immunologic consequences of laparoscopic surgery and pneumoperitoneum.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8703153     DOI: 10.1007/BF00188485

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  9 in total

Review 1.  Perceived future of laparoscopic general surgery.

Authors:  K A Zucker
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  Intraabdominal mesh prosthesis in a canine model.

Authors:  B Schlechter; J Marks; R B Shillingstad; J L Ponsky
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Laparoscopic surgery in the rat. Description of a new technique.

Authors:  R Berguer; C Gutt; G V Stiegmann
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1993 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Animal models as educational tools in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  B Böhm; J W Milsom
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Laparoscopic colon surgery in a rat model. A preliminary report.

Authors:  R Berguer; C N Gutt
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Laparoscopic appendicectomy: a prospective analysis.

Authors:  M R Cox; J L McCall; T G Wilson; R T Padbury; P L Jeans; J Toouli
Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg       Date:  1993-11

7.  Is immune function better preserved after laparoscopic versus open colon resection?

Authors:  M Bessler; R L Whelan; A Halverson; M R Treat; R Nowygrod
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Tumor growth after laparotomy or laparoscopy. A preliminary study.

Authors:  J D Allendorf; M Bessler; M L Kayton; R L Whelan; M R Treat; R Nowygrod
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Operative laparoscopy versus open abdominal surgery: a comparative study on postoperative adhesion formation in the rat model.

Authors:  S Filmar; V Gomel; P F McComb
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 7.329

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.