Literature DB >> 2957239

Operative laparoscopy versus open abdominal surgery: a comparative study on postoperative adhesion formation in the rat model.

S Filmar, V Gomel, P F McComb.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the occurrence of adhesions after a standard uterine injury inflicted by laparoscopy or by laparotomy during which microsurgical principles were observed. The cross-sectional areas of adhesions involving the uterus were assessed and the 31 rats operated upon laparoscopically were compared with the 30 rats subjected to a laparotomy. The mean area of uterine adhesions formed in the laparotomy group was 4.29 mm2 and 8.88 mm2 in the laparoscopy group. The difference was not statistically significant. The results imply that a standard tissue injury to uterine tissue, whether conducted by laparoscopy or via laparotomy, carries the same potential to induce postoperative adhesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 2957239     DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)59423-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  14 in total

1.  A comparative study of postoperative adhesion formation after laparoscopic vs open cholecystectomy.

Authors:  G Polymeneas; T Theodosopoulos; A Stamatiadis; E Kourias
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Abdominal adhesions: intestinal obstruction, pain, and infertility.

Authors:  W W Vrijland; J Jeekel; H J van Geldorp; D J Swank; H J Bonjer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-03-14       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Fewer adhesions induced by laparoscopic surgery?

Authors:  C N Gutt; T Oniu; P Schemmer; A Mehrabi; M W Büchler
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-04-27       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Adhesion formation with open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an immunologic and histologic study.

Authors:  Gy Szabó; I Mikó; P Nagy; E Bráth; K Peto; I Furka; E M Gamal
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-12-04       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Laparoscopic surgery in a small animal model. A simplified technique of retroperitoneal dissection in the rat.

Authors:  B A Sandoval; T T Sulaiman; A V Robinson; T A Stellato
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Determination of cardiorespiratory function and the optimum anesthetic regimen during laparoscopic surgery in the rat model.

Authors:  M Dalton; J Hildreth; T Matsuoka; R Berguer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Laparoscopic surgery in the rat. Description of a new technique.

Authors:  R Berguer; C Gutt; G V Stiegmann
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1993 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Thoracoscopic surgery of the oesophagus in rats: a training concept for the treatment of tracheo-oesophageal malformations in preterm infants.

Authors:  S Kellnar; H Till; R Böhm; M Weiss
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 1.827

9.  Laparoscopic colon surgery in a rat model. A preliminary report.

Authors:  R Berguer; C N Gutt
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  [Laparoscopy versus laparotomy. An animal experiment study comparing adhesion formation in the dog].

Authors:  A Tittel; E Schippers; K H Treutner; M Anuroff; M Polivoda; A Ottinger; V Schumpelick
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1994
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.