Literature DB >> 8216060

Laparoscopic appendicectomy: a prospective analysis.

M R Cox1, J L McCall, T G Wilson, R T Padbury, P L Jeans, J Toouli.   

Abstract

The potential advantages of laparoscopic surgery for a number of abdominal operations including appendicectomy have been heralded. In this study the aims were to assess prospectively the role of routine diagnostic laparoscopy in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis and determine the efficacy of laparoscopic appendicectomy. Patients with suspected acute appendicitis had diagnostic laparoscopy. When the diagnosis was confirmed laparoscopic appendicectomy was performed. Where an alternative diagnosis was made the appropriate treatment was instituted. If no diagnosis could be made the macroscopically normal appendix was removed by laparoscopic appendicectomy. Eighty-one patients (50 female, 31 male) had an initial diagnostic laparoscopy; 53 had appendicitis and proceeded to laparoscopic appendicectomy. A diagnosis could not be established at diagnostic laparoscopy in six patients and they also proceeded to laparoscopic appendicectomy. An alternative diagnosis was made in the remaining 22 patients (19 female and 3 male), with five proceeding to laparotomy and one patient with mesenteric adenitis having laparoscopic appendicectomy. Seven patients having laparoscopic appendicectomy required conversion to an open operation due to a retrocaecal or perforated appendix. The median operating time for successful laparoscopic appendicectomy was 55 min (range 30-95). Morbidity occurred in five of 53 patients having a successful laparoscopic appendicectomy. The median postoperative hospital stay was 2 days. The median time before return to normal activities was 8 days. Diagnostic laparoscopy is a useful diagnostic technique in women with suspected acute appendicitis, as it improves diagnostic accuracy, reduces the negative appendicectomy rate and avoids unnecessary laparotomy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8216060     DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1993.tb00357.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg        ISSN: 0004-8682


  6 in total

1.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy--quality of life 7 years after surgery.

Authors:  Matthias Kapischke; Florian Friedrich; Jürgen Hedderich; Tim Schulz; Amke Caliebe
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Evidence to support the use of laparoscopic over open appendicectomy for obese individuals: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Benjamin L Woodham; Michael R Cox; Guy D Eslick
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Laparoscopic surgery in a small animal model. A simplified technique of retroperitoneal dissection in the rat.

Authors:  B A Sandoval; T T Sulaiman; A V Robinson; T A Stellato
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Hiding the scars of an appendectomy. New method of port placement.

Authors:  D Yarish; M McKenney; D Sleeman; L Martin; U Desai
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Laparoscopic appendicectomy is associated with a lower complication rate even during the introductory phase.

Authors:  Matthias Kapischke; Juergen Tepel; Klaus Bley
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2004-09-04       Impact factor: 3.445

6.  Short term and long term results after open vs. laparoscopic appendectomy in childhood and adolescence: a subgroup analysis.

Authors:  Matthias Kapischke; Alexandra Pries; Amke Caliebe
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 2.125

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.