R L Barnhill1, J A Fine, G C Roush, M Berwick. 1. Dermatopathology Division, Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In numerous studies tumor thickness has been shown to be the most important prognostic factor for patients with localized cutaneous melanoma. However, to our knowledge there are no population-based studies analyzing the prognosis of patients living in the United States with cutaneous melanoma. METHODS: A prognostic model was developed with death as an outcome for 548 patients from Connecticut with localized cutaneous melanoma. Only patients with invasive melanoma who either died of the disease or were followed-up at least five years were studied. Fourteen pathologic parameters (histologic type of melanoma, Clark level, microscopic satellites, histologic regression, tumor thickness [Breslow], ulceration, vascular invasion, mitotic rate per mm2, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, radial vs. vertical growth phase, solar elastosis, co-existing nevus, lymphocytic response, and pigmentation) and three clinical variables (age, sex, and anatomic site) were analyzed using logistic regression. RESULTS: After univariate analysis, 10 pathologic variables showed prognostic significance: histologic type (nodular and "other" types only), Clark level, microscopic satellites, regression (protective), tumor thickness, ulceration, vascular invasion, mitotic rate, vertical growth phase, and solar elastosis (protective). In the final model employing multivariate analysis, only tumor thickness and mitotic rate continued to have independent predictive value. CONCLUSIONS: In this population-based study of 548 patients in Connecticut, tumor thickness was the most significant prognostic factor for survival of patients with localized cutaneous melanoma. Other prognostic factors studied to date have not been conclusively verified as providing any additional information beyond that of tumor thickness.
BACKGROUND: In numerous studies tumor thickness has been shown to be the most important prognostic factor for patients with localized cutaneous melanoma. However, to our knowledge there are no population-based studies analyzing the prognosis of patients living in the United States with cutaneous melanoma. METHODS: A prognostic model was developed with death as an outcome for 548 patients from Connecticut with localized cutaneous melanoma. Only patients with invasive melanoma who either died of the disease or were followed-up at least five years were studied. Fourteen pathologic parameters (histologic type of melanoma, Clark level, microscopic satellites, histologic regression, tumor thickness [Breslow], ulceration, vascular invasion, mitotic rate per mm2, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, radial vs. vertical growth phase, solar elastosis, co-existing nevus, lymphocytic response, and pigmentation) and three clinical variables (age, sex, and anatomic site) were analyzed using logistic regression. RESULTS: After univariate analysis, 10 pathologic variables showed prognostic significance: histologic type (nodular and "other" types only), Clark level, microscopic satellites, regression (protective), tumor thickness, ulceration, vascular invasion, mitotic rate, vertical growth phase, and solar elastosis (protective). In the final model employing multivariate analysis, only tumor thickness and mitotic rate continued to have independent predictive value. CONCLUSIONS: In this population-based study of 548 patients in Connecticut, tumor thickness was the most significant prognostic factor for survival of patients with localized cutaneous melanoma. Other prognostic factors studied to date have not been conclusively verified as providing any additional information beyond that of tumor thickness.
Authors: Shona Hendry; Roberto Salgado; Thomas Gevaert; Prudence A Russell; Tom John; Bibhusal Thapa; Michael Christie; Koen van de Vijver; M V Estrada; Paula I Gonzalez-Ericsson; Melinda Sanders; Benjamin Solomon; Cinzia Solinas; Gert G G M Van den Eynden; Yves Allory; Matthias Preusser; Johannes Hainfellner; Giancarlo Pruneri; Andrea Vingiani; Sandra Demaria; Fraser Symmans; Paolo Nuciforo; Laura Comerma; E A Thompson; Sunil Lakhani; Seong-Rim Kim; Stuart Schnitt; Cecile Colpaert; Christos Sotiriou; Stefan J Scherer; Michail Ignatiadis; Sunil Badve; Robert H Pierce; Giuseppe Viale; Nicolas Sirtaine; Frederique Penault-Llorca; Tomohagu Sugie; Susan Fineberg; Soonmyung Paik; Ashok Srinivasan; Andrea Richardson; Yihong Wang; Ewa Chmielik; Jane Brock; Douglas B Johnson; Justin Balko; Stephan Wienert; Veerle Bossuyt; Stefan Michiels; Nils Ternes; Nicole Burchardi; Stephen J Luen; Peter Savas; Frederick Klauschen; Peter H Watson; Brad H Nelson; Carmen Criscitiello; Sandra O'Toole; Denis Larsimont; Roland de Wind; Giuseppe Curigliano; Fabrice André; Magali Lacroix-Triki; Mark van de Vijver; Federico Rojo; Giuseppe Floris; Shahinaz Bedri; Joseph Sparano; David Rimm; Torsten Nielsen; Zuzana Kos; Stephen Hewitt; Baljit Singh; Gelareh Farshid; Sibylle Loibl; Kimberly H Allison; Nadine Tung; Sylvia Adams; Karen Willard-Gallo; Hugo M Horlings; Leena Gandhi; Andre Moreira; Fred Hirsch; Maria V Dieci; Maria Urbanowicz; Iva Brcic; Konstanty Korski; Fabien Gaire; Hartmut Koeppen; Amy Lo; Jennifer Giltnane; Marlon C Rebelatto; Keith E Steele; Jiping Zha; Kenneth Emancipator; Jonathan W Juco; Carsten Denkert; Jorge Reis-Filho; Sherene Loi; Stephen B Fox Journal: Adv Anat Pathol Date: 2017-11 Impact factor: 3.875
Authors: Gulsun Erdag; Jochen T Schaefer; Mark E Smolkin; Donna H Deacon; Sofia M Shea; Lynn T Dengel; James W Patterson; Craig L Slingluff Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2012-01-19 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Nancy E Thomas; Klaus J Busam; Lynn From; Anne Kricker; Bruce K Armstrong; Hoda Anton-Culver; Stephen B Gruber; Richard P Gallagher; Roberto Zanetti; Stefano Rosso; Terence Dwyer; Alison Venn; Peter A Kanetsky; Pamela A Groben; Honglin Hao; Irene Orlow; Anne S Reiner; Li Luo; Susan Paine; David W Ollila; Homer Wilcox; Colin B Begg; Marianne Berwick Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2013-10-14 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Sarah A Weiss; Sung Won Han; Kevin Lui; Jeremy Tchack; Richard Shapiro; Russell Berman; Judy Zhong; Michelle Krogsgaard; Iman Osman; Farbod Darvishian Journal: Hum Pathol Date: 2016-07-26 Impact factor: 3.466
Authors: Melanie A Warycha; Paul J Christos; Madhu Mazumdar; Farbod Darvishian; Richard L Shapiro; Russell S Berman; Anna C Pavlick; Alfred W Kopf; David Polsky; Iman Osman Journal: Cancer Date: 2008-12-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Soheil S Dadras; Thomas Paul; Jennifer Bertoncini; Lawrence F Brown; Alona Muzikansky; David G Jackson; Ulf Ellwanger; Claus Garbe; Martin C Mihm; Michael Detmar Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 4.307