Literature DB >> 27602146

An observational study regarding the rate of growth in vertical and radial growth phase superficial spreading melanomas.

Roberto Betti1, Elena Agape1, Raffaella Vergani1, Laura Moneghini2, Amilcare Cerri1.   

Abstract

The natural history of superficial spreading melanomas (SSMs) involves the progression from a radial growth phase (RGP) to a vertical growth phase (VGP). Currently, a patient's history represents the only method to estimate the rate of tumor growth. The present study aimed to verify whether the estimated rate of growth (ROG) of SSMs with a RGP or VGP exhibited any differences, and to evaluate the possible implications for the most important prognostic determinants. ROG was quantified as the ratio between Breslow's thickness in millimeters (mm) and the time of tumor growth in months, defined as the time between the date that the patient had first noticed the lesion in which melanoma subsequently developed and the date on which the patient first felt this lesion changed. A total of 105 patients (58 male and 47 female) were studied. Of these, 66 had VGP-SSMs, whilst 39 had RGP-only SSMs (RGP-SSMs). No significant differences in age and gender were observed between these groups. The mean Breslow's thickness in patients with VGP-SSMs was significantly greater than in patients with RGP-SSMs (0.78±0.68 vs. 0.48±0.22 mm, P=0.0096). Similarly, the ROG was observed to be higher in VGP-SSM vs. RGP-SSM patients (0.13±0.16 vs. 0.065±0.09 mm/month, P=0.0244). In patients with VGP-SSMs, Breslow's thickness and ROG were significantly higher for tumors with a mitotic rate of ≥1 mitosis/mm2 compared with those with <1 mitosis/mm2 (1.15±0.96 vs. 0.56±0.30 mm, P=0.0005; and 0.188±0.20 vs. 0.09±0.12 mm/month, P=0.0228, respectively). According to these results, two subsets of SSMs exist: The first is characterized by the presence of mitosis and a higher ROG, while the second exhibits a more indolent behavior and is characterized by an RGP only. Given the differences in the Breslow's thickness and ROG, clinicians must be aware of the possible diagnostic delay in these subsets of melanoma that, differently from true nodular melanomas, generally fulfill the classical ABCD clinical criteria.

Entities:  

Keywords:  radial growth phase; rate of growth; superficial spreading melanoma; vertical growth phase

Year:  2016        PMID: 27602146      PMCID: PMC4998523          DOI: 10.3892/ol.2016.4813

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Lett        ISSN: 1792-1074            Impact factor:   2.967


  19 in total

1.  Predicting five-year outcome for patients with cutaneous melanoma in a population-based study.

Authors:  R L Barnhill; J A Fine; G C Roush; M Berwick
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1996-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Growth rate, early detection, and prevention of melanoma: melanoma epidemiology revisited and future challenges.

Authors:  Dan Lipsker
Journal:  Arch Dermatol       Date:  2006-12

3.  Rate of growth in melanomas: characteristics and associations of rapidly growing melanomas.

Authors:  Wendy Liu; John P Dowling; William K Murray; Grant A McArthur; John F Thompson; Rory Wolfe; John W Kelly
Journal:  Arch Dermatol       Date:  2006-12

4.  Identification of vertical growth phase in malignant melanoma. A study of interobserver agreement.

Authors:  N C McDermott; D P Hayes; M H al-Sader; J M Hogan; C B Walsh; E W Kay; M B Leader
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.493

5.  Biologic and prognostic significance of dermal Ki67 expression, mitoses, and tumorigenicity in thin invasive cutaneous melanoma.

Authors:  Phyllis A Gimotty; Patricia Van Belle; David E Elder; Todd Murry; Kathleen T Montone; Xiaowei Xu; Susan Hotz; Shane Raines; Michael E Ming; Peter Wahl; Dupont Guerry
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-11-01       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 6.  Cellular heterogeneity in vertical growth phase melanoma.

Authors:  Alvaro C Laga; George F Murphy
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 5.534

7.  Model predicting survival in stage I melanoma based on tumor progression.

Authors:  W H Clark; D E Elder; D Guerry; L E Braitman; B J Trock; D Schultz; M Synnestvedt; A C Halpern
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1989-12-20       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  The kinetics of the visible growth of a primary melanoma reflects the tumor aggressiveness and is an independent prognostic marker: a prospective study.

Authors:  Jean Jacques Grob; Marie Aleth Richard; Johany Gouvernet; Marie Françoise Avril; Michèle Delaunay; Pierre Wolkenstein; Pierre Souteyrand; Jean Jacques Bonerandi; Laurent Machet; Jean Claude Guillaume; Jacqueline Chevrant-Breton; Catherine Vilmer; François Aubin; Bernard Guillot; Marie Beylot-Barry; Catherine Lok; Nadia Raison-Peyron; Philippe Chemaly
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2002-11-01       Impact factor: 7.396

9.  Cutaneous melanoma: prognosis and treatment results worldwide.

Authors:  C M Balch
Journal:  Semin Surg Oncol       Date:  1992 Nov-Dec

10.  Early detection of malignant melanoma: the role of physician examination and self-examination of the skin.

Authors:  R J Friedman; D S Rigel; A W Kopf
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1985 May-Jun       Impact factor: 508.702

View more
  4 in total

1.  Sequential digital dermatoscopic imaging of patients with multiple atypical nevi.

Authors:  Philipp Tschandl
Journal:  Dermatol Pract Concept       Date:  2018-07-31

2.  Prognosis for Cutaneous Melanoma by Clinical and Pathological Profile: A Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Alessandra Buja; Andrea Bardin; Giovanni Damiani; Manuel Zorzi; Chiara De Toni; Riccardo Fusinato; Romina Spina; Antonella Vecchiato; Paolo Del Fiore; Simone Mocellin; Vincenzo Baldo; Massimo Rugge; Carlo Riccardo Rossi
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 6.244

3.  Untangling Classification Methods for Melanoma Skin Cancer.

Authors:  Ayushi Kumar; Avimanyou Vatsa
Journal:  Front Big Data       Date:  2022-03-29

4.  Deep learning-level melanoma detection by interpretable machine learning and imaging biomarker cues.

Authors:  Daniel S Gareau; James Browning; Joel Correa Da Rosa; Mayte Suarez-Farinas; Samantha Lish; Amanda M Zong; Benjamin Firester; Charles Vrattos; Yael Renert-Yuval; Mauricio Gamboa; María G Vallone; Zamira F Barragán-Estudillo; Alejandra L Tamez-Peña; Javier Montoya; Miriam A Jesús-Silva; Cristina Carrera; Josep Malvehy; Susana Puig; Ashfaq Marghoob; John A Carucci; James G Krueger
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 3.170

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.