Literature DB >> 24487785

Tissue prognostic biomarkers in primary cutaneous melanoma.

Mario Mandalà1, Daniela Massi.   

Abstract

Cutaneous melanoma (CM) causes the greatest number of skin cancer-related deaths worldwide. Predicting CM prognosis is important to determine the need for further investigation, counseling of patients, to guide appropriate management (particularly the need for postoperative adjuvant therapy), and for assignment of risk status in groups of patients entering clinical trials. Since recurrence rate is largely independent from stages defined by morphological and morphometric criteria, there is a strong need for identification of additional robust prognostic factors to support decision-making processes. Most data on prognostic biomarkers in melanoma have been evaluated in tumor tissue samples by conventional morphology and immunohistochemistry (IHC) as well as DNA and RNA analyses. In the present review, we critically summarize main high-quality studies investigating IHC-based protein biomarkers of melanoma outcome according to Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies (REMARK)-derived criteria. Pathways have been classified and conveyed in the "biologic road" previously described by Hanahan and Weinberg. Data derived from genomic and transcriptomic technologies have been critically reviewed to better understand if any of investigated proteins or gene signatures should be incorporated into clinical practice or still remain a field of melanoma research. Despite a wide body of research, no molecular prognostic biomarker has yet been translated into clinical practice. Conventional tissue biomarkers, such as Breslow thickness, ulceration, mitotic rate and lymph node positivity, remain the backbone prognostic indicators in melanoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24487785     DOI: 10.1007/s00428-013-1526-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Virchows Arch        ISSN: 0945-6317            Impact factor:   4.064


  133 in total

1.  CD44v3 levels in primary cutaneous melanoma are predictive of prognosis: assessment by the use of tissue microarray.

Authors:  Marc D Pacifico; Rajiv Grover; Paul I Richman; Frances M Daley; Francesca Buffa; George D Wilson
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 7.396

2.  Molecular classification of cutaneous malignant melanoma by gene expression profiling.

Authors:  M Bittner; P Meltzer; Y Chen; Y Jiang; E Seftor; M Hendrix; M Radmacher; R Simon; Z Yakhini; A Ben-Dor; N Sampas; E Dougherty; E Wang; F Marincola; C Gooden; J Lueders; A Glatfelter; P Pollock; J Carpten; E Gillanders; D Leja; K Dietrich; C Beaudry; M Berens; D Alberts; V Sondak
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-08-03       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Cancer-testis antigen expression in primary cutaneous melanoma has independent prognostic value comparable to that of Breslow thickness, ulceration and mitotic rate.

Authors:  Suzanne Svobodová; Judy Browning; Duncan MacGregor; Gabriele Pollara; Richard A Scolyer; Rajmohan Murali; John F Thompson; Siddhartha Deb; Arun Azad; Ian D Davis; Jonathan S Cebon
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 9.162

4.  Model predicting survival in stage I melanoma based on tumor progression.

Authors:  W H Clark; D E Elder; D Guerry; L E Braitman; B J Trock; D Schultz; M Synnestvedt; A C Halpern
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1989-12-20       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Combinations of apoptosis and cell-cycle control biomarkers predict the outcome of human melanoma.

Authors:  Franca Piras; Maria Teresa Perra; Daniela Murtas; Luigi Minerba; Carlo Floris; Cristina Maxia; Paolo Demurtas; Jorge Ugalde; Domenico Ribatti; Paola Sirigu
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.906

6.  Expression of glucose-regulated stress protein GRP78 is related to progression of melanoma.

Authors:  Liquing Zhuang; Richard A Scolyer; C Soon Lee; Stanley W McCarthy; Wendy A Cooper; Xu D Zhang; John F Thompson; Peter Hersey
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.087

Review 7.  The prognostic value of BRAF mutation in colorectal cancer and melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gholamreza Safaee Ardekani; Seyed Mehdi Jafarnejad; Larry Tan; Ardavan Saeedi; Gang Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Cytoplasmic Skp2 expression is increased in human melanoma and correlated with patient survival.

Authors:  Guangdi Chen; Yabin Cheng; Zhizhong Zhang; Magdalena Martinka; Gang Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Low RBM3 protein expression correlates with tumour progression and poor prognosis in malignant melanoma: an analysis of 215 cases from the Malmö Diet and Cancer Study.

Authors:  Liv Jonsson; Julia Bergman; Björn Nodin; Jonas Manjer; Fredrik Pontén; Mathias Uhlén; Karin Jirström
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2011-07-21       Impact factor: 5.531

10.  Metallothionein - overexpression as a highly significant prognostic factor in melanoma: a prospective study on 1270 patients.

Authors:  G Weinlich; K Eisendle; E Hassler; M Baltaci; P O Fritsch; B Zelger
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2006-03-27       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  13 in total

1.  Improving Melanoma Path Reports: the Importance of Histopathological Parameters in Diagnosis of Cutaneous Melanoma.

Authors:  Alina Mariana Avram; Olga Dana Simionescu; Mariana Costache; Mariana Grigore
Journal:  Maedica (Buchar)       Date:  2015-09

2.  Using global gene expression to discriminate thin melanomas with poor outcomes.

Authors:  Zachary Hothem; Andrew Bayci; Bryan J Thibodeau; Billie E Ketelsen; Laura E Fortier; Alison F Uzieblo; Diane Cosner; Kristin Totoraitis; Richard D Keidan; George D Wilson
Journal:  Mol Cell Oncol       Date:  2016-11-08

3.  Prognostic biomarkers: an introduction.

Authors:  Fred T Bosman; Lawrence D True
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2014-02-22       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 4.  Biomarkers Predictive of Survival and Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Melanoma.

Authors:  Emanuelle M Rizk; Angelina M Seffens; Megan H Trager; Michael R Moore; Larisa J Geskin; Robyn D Gartrell-Corrado; Winston Wong; Yvonne M Saenger
Journal:  Am J Clin Dermatol       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 7.403

5.  Epigenetic activation of a cryptic TBC1D16 transcript enhances melanoma progression by targeting EGFR.

Authors:  Miguel Vizoso; Humberto J Ferreira; Paula Lopez-Serra; F Javier Carmona; Anna Martínez-Cardús; Maria Romina Girotti; Alberto Villanueva; Sonia Guil; Catia Moutinho; Julia Liz; Anna Portela; Holger Heyn; Sebastian Moran; August Vidal; Maria Martinez-Iniesta; Jose L Manzano; Maria Teresa Fernandez-Figueras; Elena Elez; Eva Muñoz-Couselo; Rafael Botella-Estrada; Alfonso Berrocal; Fredrik Pontén; Joost van den Oord; William M Gallagher; Dennie T Frederick; Keith T Flaherty; Ultan McDermott; Paul Lorigan; Richard Marais; Manel Esteller
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 53.440

6.  5-Hydroxymethylcytosine is an independent predictor of survival in malignant melanoma.

Authors:  Gerald Saldanha; Kushal Joshi; Kathryn Lawes; Mark Bamford; Farhaan Moosa; Kah Wee Teo; J Howard Pringle
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 7.842

7.  Loss of primary cilia in melanoma cells is likely independent of proliferation and cell cycle progression.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Snedecor; Clifford C Sung; Alejandra Moncayo; Brooke E Rothstein; Daniel C Mockler; Marcia G Tonnesen; Evan C Jones; Mayumi Fujita; Richard A Clark; Kenneth R Shroyer; Jiang Chen
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 8.551

8.  Skewed Differentiation of Circulating Vγ9Vδ2 T Lymphocytes in Melanoma and Impact on Clinical Outcome.

Authors:  Francesca Toia; Simona Buccheri; Ampelio Anfosso; Francesco Moschella; Francesco Dieli; Serena Meraviglia; Adriana Cordova
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Cofilin-1 levels and intracellular localization are associated with melanoma prognosis in a cohort of patients.

Authors:  Candelaria Bracalente; Adriana R Rinflerch; Irene L Ibañez; Francisco M García; Victoria Volonteri; Gastón N Galimberti; Fabio Klamt; Hebe Durán
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-05-08

10.  CD10-Equipped Melanoma Cells Acquire Highly Potent Tumorigenic Activity: A Plausible Explanation of Their Significance for a Poor Prognosis.

Authors:  Junna Oba; Takeshi Nakahara; Akiko Hashimoto-Hachiya; Min Liu; Takeru Abe; Akihito Hagihara; Takehiko Yokomizo; Masutaka Furue
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.