Literature DB >> 8695366

Serum neuron-specific enolase (S-NSE) and the prognosis in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC): a combined multivariable analysis on data from nine centres.

L G Jørgensen1, K Osterlind, J Genollá, S A Gomm, J R Hernández, P W Johnson, J Løber, T A Splinter, M Szturmowicz.   

Abstract

The influence of pretreatment serum neuron-specific enolase (S-NSE) in addition to more conventional prognostic factors on survival duration in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) was investigated in 770 patients from nine centres in six countries. The other variables included stage of disease, performance status (PS), age, sex, serum lactate dehydrogenase (S-LDH), serum alkaline phosphatase (S-AP), and serum carcinoembryonic antigen (S-CEA). Increased values of S-NSE (> 12.5 micrograms-1 l) were observed in 81% of the patients, whereas S-LDH, S-AP and S-CEA were elevated in only half of the patients or less. Multivariable analysis by Cox's proportional hazard model disclosed S-NSE as the most powerful prognostic factor followed by poor PS and extensive stage disease. If PS was ignored, S-LDH came up as a significant prognostic factor. S-AP, S-CEA, age and sex had no significant influence on the prognosis. The three prognostic factors, S-NSE, PS and stage of disease, enabled establishment of a prognostic index (PI) based on a simple algorithm PI = zNSE + z(stage) + 2zPS. This segregated the patients into four groups with clearly different prognosis. The median survival and 95% confidence intervals of the four groups were: 468 days (540-408), 362 days (405-328), 256 days (270-241) and 125 days (179-58). Based on the present results we recommend S-NSE and PS, in addition to stage, for prognostic stratification in treatment trials on SCLC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8695366      PMCID: PMC2074633          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1996.383

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  18 in total

1.  Pretreatment prognostic factors and scoring system in 407 small-cell lung cancer patients.

Authors:  T Cerny; V Blair; H Anderson; V Bramwell; N Thatcher
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1987-02-15       Impact factor: 7.396

2.  Serum neuron-specific enolase. A marker for disease extent and response to therapy for small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  G M Akoun; H M Scarna; B J Milleron; M P Bénichou; D P Herman
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 9.410

3.  Prognostic significance of laboratory parameters measured at diagnosis in small cell carcinoma of the lung.

Authors:  R L Souhami; I Bradbury; D M Geddes; S G Spiro; P G Harper; J S Tobias
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Cyclophosphamide and CCNU in the treatment of inoperable small cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the lung.

Authors:  J H Edmonson; S W Lagakos; O S Selawry; C P Perlia; J M Bennett; F M Muggia; G Wampler; H S Brodovsky; J Horton; J Colsky; E G Mansour; R Creech; L Stolbach; E M Greenspan; M Levitt; L Israel; E Z Ezdinli; P P Carbone
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1976-07

5.  Prognostic factors in small cell lung cancer: multivariate model based on 778 patients treated with chemotherapy with or without irradiation.

Authors:  K Osterlind; P K Andersen
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Cyclic alternating combination chemotherapy for small cell bronchogenic carcinoma.

Authors:  M H Cohen; D C Ihde; P A Bunn; B E Fossieck; M J Matthews; S E Shackney; A Johnston-Early; R Makuch; J D Minna
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1979-02

7.  Serum neuron-specific enolase: a marker for disease extent and response to therapy of small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  D N Carney; P J Marangos; D C Ihde; P A Bunn; M H Cohen; J D Minna; A F Gazdar
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1982-03-13       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Laboratory parameters as an alternative to performance status in prognostic stratification of patients with small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  M H Cohen; R Makuch; A Johnston-Early; D C Ihde; P A Bunn; B E Fossieck; J D Minna
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1981 Mar-Apr

9.  Prognostic implications of stage of disease and sites of metastases in patients with small cell carcinoma of the lung treated with intensive combination chemotherapy.

Authors:  D C Ihde; R W Makuch; D N Carney; P A Bunn; M H Cohen; M J Matthews; J D Minna
Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis       Date:  1981-05

10.  Evaluation of a radioimmunoassay for neuron specific enolase in small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  E H Cooper; T A Splinter; D A Brown; M F Muers; M D Peake; S L Pearson
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  23 in total

1.  CK-19 mRNA-positive cells in peripheral blood predict treatment efficacy and survival in small-cell lung cancer patients.

Authors:  Wei-Lin Shi; Jian Li; Yong-Jie Du; Wen-Fang Zhu; Yan Wu; Yi-Ming Hu; Yong-Chang Chen
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 3.064

2.  The prognostic nutritional index (PNI) predicts overall survival of small-cell lung cancer patients.

Authors:  Shaodong Hong; Ting Zhou; Wenfeng Fang; Cong Xue; Zhihuang Hu; Tao Qin; Yanna Tang; Yue Chen; Yuxiang Ma; Yunpeng Yang; Xue Hou; Yan Huang; Hongyun Zhao; Yuanyuan Zhao; Li Zhang
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-12-20

3.  Early clinical diagnosis of synchronous multiple primary lung cancer.

Authors:  Xinying Xue; Qingliang Xue; Na Wang; Lina Zhang; Lina Guo; Xinfu Li; Junping Sun; Jianxin Wang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 2.967

4.  Survival and prognostic factors in small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Jian Li; Chun-Hua Dai; Ping Chen; Jian-Nong Wu; Quan-Lei Bao; Hao Qiu; Xiao-Qin Li
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 3.064

5.  Evaluation of circulating tumor cells and serological cell death biomarkers in small cell lung cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.

Authors:  Jian-Mei Hou; Alastair Greystoke; Lee Lancashire; Jeff Cummings; Tim Ward; Ruth Board; Eitan Amir; Sarah Hughes; Matthew Krebs; Andrew Hughes; Malcolm Ranson; Paul Lorigan; Caroline Dive; Fiona H Blackhall
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 4.307

6.  Serum neuron-specific enolase levels were associated with the prognosis of small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wei-Xin Zhao; Jian-feng Luo
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2013-06-18

7.  A population pharmacodynamic model for lactate dehydrogenase and neuron specific enolase to predict tumor progression in small cell lung cancer patients.

Authors:  Núria Buil-Bruna; José-María López-Picazo; Marta Moreno-Jiménez; Salvador Martín-Algarra; Benjamin Ribba; Iñaki F Trocóniz
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 4.009

8.  Prognostic significance of serum neuron-specific enolase in small cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder.

Authors:  Akihiro Naito; Satoru Taguchi; Tohru Nakagawa; Akihiko Matsumoto; Yasushi Nagase; Mariko Tabata; Jimpei Miyakawa; Motofumi Suzuki; Hiroaki Nishimatsu; Yutaka Enomoto; Shintaro Takahashi; Toshikazu Okaneya; Daisuke Yamada; Takamitsu Tachikawa; Shigeru Minowada; Tetsuya Fujimura; Hiroshi Fukuhara; Haruki Kume; Yukio Homma
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-05-14       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  NSE can predict the sensitivity to definitive chemoradiotherapy of small cell carcinoma of esophagus.

Authors:  Hongjiang Yan; Renben Wang; Shumei Jiang; Kunli Zhu; Rui Feng; Xiaoqing Xu; Xiangjiao Meng
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 3.064

10.  Characteristics and clinical validity of two immunoassays for ProGRP.

Authors:  Marianne S Nordlund; Petra Stieber; Odd Terje Brustugun; David J Warren; Elisabeth Paus
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2012-03-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.