Literature DB >> 1009523

Cyclophosphamide and CCNU in the treatment of inoperable small cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the lung.

J H Edmonson, S W Lagakos, O S Selawry, C P Perlia, J M Bennett, F M Muggia, G Wampler, H S Brodovsky, J Horton, J Colsky, E G Mansour, R Creech, L Stolbach, E M Greenspan, M Levitt, L Israel, E Z Ezdinli, P P Carbone.   

Abstract

Two hundred and fifty-eight patients with small cell carcinoma and 185 patients with adenocarcinoma were centrally randomized to receive either cyclophosphamide (1000 mg/m2 every 3 weeks) iv or cyclophosphamide (700 mg/m2 every 3 weeks) iv plus CCNU (70 mg/m2 every 6 weeks) orally. Those patients who were initially treated with the single agent were then treated with CCNU (130 mg/m2 every 6 weeks) at the time of cyclophosphamide failure. Objective tumor regression occurred more frequently with the combination regimen in patients with small cell carcinoma (43% vs 22%, P = 0.002), but no difference in response rates was apparent in patients with adenocarcinoma. In both cell types patients survived somewhat longer following treatment with the combination. The overall incidence of severe toxicity was equal for the two regimens in both cell types; however, the therapeutic index of the combination was superior to that of the single agent in small cell carcinoma. Severe drug toxicity was more frequent in small cell carcinoma patients with extensive disease, and survival was reduced in both cell types with extensive disease. Survival was better for ambulatory patients in both cell types and women survived longer than men. In women with small cell carcinoma, ambulatory status also was associated with a higher incidence of tumor regression. In patients with small cell carcinoma those who had prior lung surgery survived longer than those without prior surgery. Previous radiation therapy was associated with a reduced incidence of objective regression in men with small cell carcinoma. In both cell types patients with tumor regression lived longer than nonresponders; however, objective disease stability was associated with improved survival only in patients with adenocarcinoma. Stratification in future studies should consider extent of disease, performance status, sex, and prior therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1976        PMID: 1009523

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep        ISSN: 0361-5960


  10 in total

1.  Differential effect of age on survival in advanced NSCLC in women versus men: analysis of recent Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) studies, with and without bevacizumab.

Authors:  H A Wakelee; S E Dahlberg; J R Brahmer; J H Schiller; M C Perry; C J Langer; A B Sandler; C P Belani; D H Johnson
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2012-01-21       Impact factor: 5.705

Review 2.  Combination chemotherapy for advanced adenocarcinoma of the lung. A review.

Authors:  J B Sørensen; H H Hansen
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 3.  Chemotherapy of advanced non-small cell lung cancer. A review.

Authors:  B J Takasugi; T P Miller
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 3.850

4.  Chemotherapy in non-small cell bronchial carcinoma.

Authors:  R Souhami
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 9.139

5.  TNM stage, immunohistology, syntactic structure analysis and survival in patients with small cell anaplastic carcinoma of the lung.

Authors:  K Kayser; M Fitzer; H Bülzebruck; K Bosslet; P Drings
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.553

6.  Failure of intensive combination therapy (cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, 5-fluorouracil) to control adenocarcinoma or large-cell anaplastic carcinoma of lung.

Authors:  R E Taylor; I E Smith; H T Ford; B M Bryant; A J Casey; J F Smyth
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 3.333

7.  Cisplatin, vinblastine, and bleomycin in inoperable non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  R Stuart-Harris; R M Fox; D Raghavan; A S Coates; D Hedley; J A Levi; R L Woods; M H Tattersall
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 8.  Current options in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  D Faulds
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 9.  Single-agent chemotherapy for advanced adenocarcinoma of the lung. A review.

Authors:  J B Sørensen; M Clerici; H H Hansen
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.333

10.  Serum neuron-specific enolase (S-NSE) and the prognosis in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC): a combined multivariable analysis on data from nine centres.

Authors:  L G Jørgensen; K Osterlind; J Genollá; S A Gomm; J R Hernández; P W Johnson; J Løber; T A Splinter; M Szturmowicz
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 7.640

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.