Literature DB >> 24740245

A population pharmacodynamic model for lactate dehydrogenase and neuron specific enolase to predict tumor progression in small cell lung cancer patients.

Núria Buil-Bruna1, José-María López-Picazo, Marta Moreno-Jiménez, Salvador Martín-Algarra, Benjamin Ribba, Iñaki F Trocóniz.   

Abstract

The development of individualized therapies poses a major challenge in oncology. Significant hurdles to overcome include better disease monitoring and early prediction of clinical outcome. Current clinical practice consists of using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) to categorize response to treatment. However, the utility of RECIST is restricted due to limitations on the frequency of measurement and its categorical rather than continuous nature. We propose a population modeling framework that relates circulating biomarkers in plasma, easily obtained from patients, to tumor progression levels assessed by imaging scans (i.e., RECIST categories). We successfully applied this framework to data regarding lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and neuron specific enolase (NSE) concentrations in patients diagnosed with small cell lung cancer (SCLC). LDH and NSE have been proposed as independent prognostic factors for SCLC. However, their prognostic and predictive value has not been demonstrated in the context of standard clinical practice. Our model incorporates an underlying latent variable ("disease level") representing (unobserved) tumor size dynamics, which is assumed to drive biomarker production and to be influenced by exposure to treatment; these assumptions are in agreement with the known physiology of SCLC and these biomarkers. Our model predictions of unobserved disease level are strongly correlated with disease progression measured by RECIST criteria. In conclusion, the proposed framework enables prediction of treatment outcome based on circulating biomarkers and therefore can be a powerful tool to help clinicians monitor disease in SCLC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24740245      PMCID: PMC4012048          DOI: 10.1208/s12248-014-9600-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AAPS J        ISSN: 1550-7416            Impact factor:   4.009


  45 in total

Review 1.  Predictive and prognostic factors in small cell lung cancer: current status.

Authors:  D Yip; P G Harper
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.705

2.  Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model of the testosterone effects of triptorelin administered in sustained release formulations in patients with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Elba Romero; Nieves Vélez de Mendizabal; Josep-María Cendrós; Concepción Peraire; Emma Bascompta; Rosendo Obach; Iñaki F Trocóniz
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 4.030

Review 3.  A critical review of the analytical approaches for circulating tumor biomarker kinetics during treatment.

Authors:  R Almufti; M Wilbaux; A Oza; E Henin; G Freyer; M Tod; O Colomban; B You
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 32.976

4.  Prediction-corrected visual predictive checks for diagnosing nonlinear mixed-effects models.

Authors:  Martin Bergstrand; Andrew C Hooker; Johan E Wallin; Mats O Karlsson
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 4.009

5.  Reconsidering the paradigm of cancer immunotherapy by computationally aided real-time personalization.

Authors:  Yuri Kogan; Karin Halevi-Tobias; Moran Elishmereni; Stanimir Vuk-Pavlović; Zvia Agur
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Proteomic analysis reveals Warburg effect and anomalous metabolism of glutamine in pancreatic cancer cells.

Authors:  Weidong Zhou; Michela Capello; Claudia Fredolini; Leda Racanicchi; Lorenzo Piemonti; Lance A Liotta; Francesco Novelli; Emanuel F Petricoin
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 4.466

Review 7.  Clinical perspectives on platinum resistance.

Authors:  G Giaccone
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 8.  Biomarkers for small cell lung cancer: neuroendocrine, epithelial and circulating tumour cells.

Authors:  Rachel Stovold; Fiona Blackhall; Suzanne Meredith; JianMei Hou; Caroline Dive; Anne White
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 5.705

9.  The clinical viewpoint: definitions, limitations of RECIST, practical considerations of measurement.

Authors:  Liza C Villaruz; Mark A Socinski
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 10.  Population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling in oncology: a tool for predicting clinical response.

Authors:  Brendan C Bender; Emilie Schindler; Lena E Friberg
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.335

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Bringing Model-Based Prediction to Oncology Clinical Practice: A Review of Pharmacometrics Principles and Applications.

Authors:  Núria Buil-Bruna; José-María López-Picazo; Salvador Martín-Algarra; Iñaki F Trocóniz
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2015-12-14

2.  Establishing the Quantitative Relationship Between Lanreotide Autogel®, Chromogranin A, and Progression-Free Survival in Patients with Nonfunctioning Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Authors:  Núria Buil-Bruna; Marion Dehez; Amandine Manon; Thi Xuan Quyen Nguyen; Iñaki F Trocóniz
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 4.009

3.  Assessing the impact of the addition of dendritic cell vaccination to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients: A model-based characterization approach.

Authors:  Belén P Solans; Ascensión López-Díaz de Cerio; Arlette Elizalde; Luis Javier Pina; Susana Inogés; Jaime Espinós; Esteban Salgado; Luis Daniel Mejías; Iñaki F Trocóniz; Marta Santisteban
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Propofol Breath Monitoring as a Potential Tool to Improve the Prediction of Intraoperative Plasma Concentrations.

Authors:  Pieter Colin; Douglas J Eleveld; Johannes P van den Berg; Hugo E M Vereecke; Michel M R F Struys; Gustav Schelling; Christian C Apfel; Cyrill Hornuss
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Systemic Exposure of Rituximab Increased by Ibrutinib: Pharmacokinetic Results and Modeling Based on the HELIOS Trial.

Authors:  Silvia Maria Lavezzi; Jan de Jong; Martine Neyens; Paula Cramer; Fatih Demirkan; Graeme Fraser; Nancy Bartlett; Marie-Sarah Dilhuydy; Javier Loscertales; Abraham Avigdor; Simon Rule; Olga Samoilova; Andre Goy; Siddhartha Ganguly; Mariya Salman; Angela Howes; Michelle Mahler; Giuseppe De Nicolao; Italo Poggesi
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 4.200

6.  Neuron-specific enolase and response to initial therapy are important prognostic factors in patients with small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  M Zhou; Z Wang; Y Yao; H Zhou; M Liu; J Sun
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 7.  Drug Exposure to Establish Pharmacokinetic-Response Relationships in Oncology.

Authors:  Belén P Solans; María Jesús Garrido; Iñaki F Trocóniz
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 6.447

8.  Preclinical Modeling of Tumor Growth and Angiogenesis Inhibition to Describe Pazopanib Clinical Effects in Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  A Ouerdani; H Struemper; A B Suttle; D Ouellet; B Ribba
Journal:  CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol       Date:  2015-11-03

Review 9.  A Review of Modeling Approaches to Predict Drug Response in Clinical Oncology.

Authors:  Kyungsoo Park
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.759

10.  Latent variable modeling improves AKI risk factor identification and AKI prediction compared to traditional methods.

Authors:  Loren E Smith; Derek K Smith; Jeffrey D Blume; Edward D Siew; Frederic T Billings
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 2.388

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.