Literature DB >> 8688747

Guidelines for managing raised blood pressure.

R T Jackson, D L Sackett.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  1996        PMID： 8688747      PMCID： PMC2351511          DOI： 10.1136/bmj.313.7049.64

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN： 0959-8138


× No keyword cloud information.
  10 in total

1.  Probability of stroke: a risk profile from the Framingham Study.

Authors:  P A Wolf; R B D'Agostino; A J Belanger; W B Kannel
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 7.914

2.  An updated coronary risk profile. A statement for health professionals.

Authors:  K M Anderson; P W Wilson; P M Odell; W B Kannel
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  The number needed to treat: a clinically useful measure of treatment effect.

Authors:  R J Cook; D L Sackett
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-02-18

4.  Users' guides to the medical literature. V. How to use an article about prognosis. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group.

Authors:  A Laupacis; G Wells; W S Richardson; P Tugwell
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-07-20       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Management guidelines in essential hypertension: report of the second working party of the British Hypertension Society.

Authors:  P Sever; G Beevers; C Bulpitt; A Lever; L Ramsay; J Reid; J Swales
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-04-10

Review 6.  Blood pressure management: individualized treatment based on absolute risk and the potential for benefit.

Authors:  M H Alderman
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1993-08-15       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 7.  Hypertension in the elderly. Implications and generalizability of randomized trials.

Authors:  C D Mulrow; J A Cornell; C R Herrera; A Kadri; L Farnett; C Aguilar
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-12-28       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Management of raised blood pressure in New Zealand: a discussion document.

Authors:  R Jackson; P Barham; J Bills; T Birch; L McLennan; S MacMahon; T Maling
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-07-10

9.  What constitutes controlled hypertension? Patient based comparison of hypertension guidelines.

Authors:  T P Fahey; T J Peters
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-07-13

Review 10.  Blood pressure, stroke, and coronary heart disease. Part 2, Short-term reductions in blood pressure: overview of randomised drug trials in their epidemiological context.

Authors:  R Collins; R Peto; S MacMahon; P Hebert; N H Fiebach; K A Eberlein; J Godwin; N Qizilbash; J O Taylor; C H Hennekens
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1990-04-07       Impact factor: 79.321
  10 in total
  8 in total

Review 1.  Intuition and evidence--uneasy bedfellows?

Authors:  Trisha Greenhalgh
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 2.  Numbers needed to treat derived from meta-analyses--sometimes informative, usually misleading.

Authors:  L Smeeth; A Haines; S Ebrahim
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-06-05

3.  Guidelines for clinical guidelines.

Authors:  R Jackson; G Feder
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-08-15

4.  Comparing hypertension guidelines. Cost effectiveness analyses have been carried out in Sweden.

Authors:  L H Lindholm; L Werkö
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-11-09

5.  Evaluation of computer based clinical decision support system and risk chart for management of hypertension in primary care: randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  A A Montgomery; T Fahey; T J Peters; C MacIntosh; D J Sharp
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-03-11

6.  Comparative accuracy of cardiovascular risk prediction methods in primary care patients.

Authors:  A F Jones; J Walker; C Jewkes; F L Game; W A Bartlett; T Marshall; G R Bayly
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 5.994

7.  Randomized trial evaluating the framing of cardiovascular risk and its impact on blood pressure control [ISRCTN87597585].

Authors:  T Fahey; A A Montgomery; T J Peters
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2001-10-12       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 8.  [Evidence-based public health: perspectives and specific implementation factors].

Authors:  Eva A Rehfuess; Ana Zhelyazkova; Peter von Philipsborn; Ursula Griebler; Freia De Bock
Journal:  Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 1.513
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.