Literature DB >> 1969567

Blood pressure, stroke, and coronary heart disease. Part 2, Short-term reductions in blood pressure: overview of randomised drug trials in their epidemiological context.

R Collins, R Peto, S MacMahon, P Hebert, N H Fiebach, K A Eberlein, J Godwin, N Qizilbash, J O Taylor, C H Hennekens.   

Abstract

There are 14 unconfounded randomised trials of antihypertensive drugs (chiefly diuretics or beta-blockers): total 37,000 individuals, mean treatment duration 5 years, mean diastolic blood pressure (DBP) difference 5-6 mm Hg. In prospective observational studies, a long-term difference of 5-6 mm Hg in usual DBP is associated with about 35-40% less stroke and 20-25% less coronary heart disease (CHD). For those dying in the trials, the DBP difference had persisted only 2-3 years, yet an overview showed that vascular mortality was significantly reduced (2p less than 0.0002); non-vascular mortality appeared unchanged. Stroke was reduced by 42% SD 6 (95% confidence interval 35-50%; 289 vs 484 events, 2p less than 0.0001), suggesting that virtually all the epidemiologically expected stroke reduction appears rapidly. CHD was reduced by 14% SD 5 (95% CI 4-22%; 671 vs 771 events, 2p less than 0.01), suggesting that just over half the epidemiologically expected CHD reduction appears rapidly. Although this significant CHD reduction could well be worthwhile, its size remains indefinite for most circumstances (though beta-blockers after myocardial infarction are of substantial benefit). At present, therefore, a sufficiently high risk of stroke (perhaps because of age, blood pressure, or, in particular, history of cerebrovascular disease) may be the clearest indication for antihypertensive treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 1969567     DOI: 10.1016/0140-6736(90)90944-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  638 in total

1.  Safety profile of lacidipine: update from a clinical trials database.

Authors:  L H Lindholm; P Tcherdakoff; A Zanchetti
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  The prevalence and incidence of medical conditions in healthy pharmaceutical company employees who volunteer to participate in medical research.

Authors:  S D Singh; A J Williams
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 3.  The role of diet in the prevention and treatment of hypertension.

Authors:  L J Appel
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 4.  Pathogenesis and pathology of coronary heart disease syndromes.

Authors:  P M Ridker; E M Antman
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.300

5.  Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs.

Authors:  J Concato; N Shah; R I Horwitz
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-06-22       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 6.  What is the optimal age for starting lipid lowering treatment? A mathematical model.

Authors:  S Ulrich; A D Hingorani; J Martin; P Vallance
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-04-22

7.  Measurement and interpretation of blood pressure.

Authors:  C D Goonasekera; M J Dillon
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 8.  Regression of left ventricular hypertrophy; what are appropriate therapeutic objectives?

Authors:  D J Sheridan; M P Kingsbury; N A Flores
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 9.  Cost per millimeter of mercury lowering is a measure of economic value for antihypertensive agents.

Authors:  R S Chen; P Lapuerta
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 5.369

10.  Controlling glucose and blood pressure in type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  J Tuomilehto
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-08-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.