Literature DB >> 8328743

Blood pressure management: individualized treatment based on absolute risk and the potential for benefit.

M H Alderman1.   

Abstract

Clinical practice often conflicts with epidemiologic evidence in the management of blood pressure. Antihypertensive therapy is generally prescribed if blood pressure exceeds some arbitrary level, thus committing many persons with minimal cardiovascular risk to long-term drug therapy. By contrast, below that level, regardless of cardiovascular risk, blood pressure reduction is rarely sought. Epidemiologic data, however, consistently show a continuous, positive, linear relationship of the height of both systolic and diastolic blood pressure with the incidence of stroke and heart attack. No threshold level distinguishes those who will have a cardiovascular event from those who will not. In fact, most heart attacks and many strokes occur among persons with "normal" blood pressures. Observational experience suggests that benefit could be obtained from universal blood pressure reduction of even a few millimeters of mercury. This public health strategy can be augmented by identifying those individuals, at every level of blood pressure, whose risk for cardiovascular disease justifies the cost of pharmacologic intervention. Antihypertensive drug therapy will be most efficient and effective if directed at those who, by virtue of their constellation of risk factors or evidence of preclinical vascular disease, are likely to have a heart attack or stroke. The resulting redirection of clinical resources will spare many hypertensive persons whose absolute risk for a cardiovascular event is small, from life-long treatment. At the same time, other persons, currently classified as normotensive, will become candidates for blood pressure reduction because their cardiovascular risk is high.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8328743     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-119-4-199308150-00013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  21 in total

1.  Reassessing normal blood pressure.

Authors:  Ira S Nash
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-09-01

2.  Guidelines for managing raised blood pressure.

Authors:  R T Jackson; D L Sackett
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-07-13

3.  Stroke prevention.

Authors:  R Tozer; I R Hastie
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 2.401

4.  Who benefits from medical interventions?

Authors:  G D Smith; M Egger
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-01-08

Review 5.  Implications of Recent Clinical Trials and Hypertension Guidelines on Stroke and Future Cerebrovascular Research.

Authors:  Daniel T Lackland; Robert M Carey; Adriana B Conforto; Clive Rosendorff; Paul K Whelton; Philip B Gorelick
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 6.  Using Predicted Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Conjunction With Blood Pressure to Guide Antihypertensive Medication Treatment.

Authors:  Paul Muntner; Paul K Whelton
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Hypertension management in general practice.

Authors:  M Whitfield; A Hughes
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 8.  Intensive antihypertensive treatment to the new lower blood pressure targets.

Authors:  W J Elliott
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 5.369

9.  Comparison of a lifestyle modification program with propranolol use in the management of diastolic hypertension.

Authors:  E J Pérez-Stable; T J Coates; R B Baron; B S Biró; W W Hauck; K S McHenry; P S Gardiner; D Feigal
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 10.  ACE inhibitors. Differential use in elderly patients with hypertension.

Authors:  Z H Israili; W D Hall
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 3.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.