Literature DB >> 8688581

Polymerase chain reaction amplification specificity: incidence of allele dropout using different DNA preparation methods for heterozygous single cells.

S A Gitlin1, S E Lanzendorf, W E Gibbons.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose was to evaluate methods of DNA preparation in a single cell to determine the ability to amplify and correctly diagnose a targeted gene.
METHODS: One- or two-cell lymphoblasts (n = 100/group), heterozygous for the normal and 4-base pair insertion on exon 11 of the beta-hexosaminidase A gene, were collected and prepared under the following conditions: (1) freeze-thaw liquid nitrogen, then boiling (LN2); (2) potassium hydroxide/dithiothreitol, heated to 65 degrees C, followed by acid neutralization (KOH); (3) boiling only (Bl); and (4) water only (H2O). Cells were analyzed by polymerase chain reaction using nested primers.
RESULTS: The total number of cells amplifying [in brackets] and the cells with amplification for both alleles (heterozygous), the normal allele, or the mutant allele were as follows, respectively: LN2 [38], 11, 16, 11; KOH [97], 91, 5, 1; Bl [41], 17, 13, 11; and H2O [85], 41, 16, 28. With two cells per reaction tube the results were as follows: LN2 [85], 53, 14, 18; and KOH [97], 96, 1, 0.
CONCLUSIONS: KOH lysis was significantly greater than with all other methods (P < 0.006) and should be used for single cells. This study also demonstrates the importance of using heterozygous cells to determine the ability to amplify both alleles as a method of quality control for single-cell analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8688581     DOI: 10.1007/bf02072530

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  13 in total

1.  Whole genome amplification from a single cell: implications for genetic analysis.

Authors:  L Zhang; X Cui; K Schmitt; R Hubert; W Navidi; N Arnheim
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-07-01       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Pregnancy after embryo biopsy and coamplification of DNA from X and Y chromosomes.

Authors:  J A Grifo; Y X Tang; J Cohen; F Gilbert; M K Sanyal; Z Rosenwaks
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1992-08-12       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 3.  Preimplantation diagnosis of genetic and chromosomal disorders.

Authors:  Y Verlinsky; A Handyside; J Grifo; S Munné; J Cohen; I Liebers; G Levinson; N Arnheim; M Hughes; J Delhanty
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Effect of heat denaturation of target DNA on the PCR amplification.

Authors:  C E Gustafson; R A Alm; T J Trust
Journal:  Gene       Date:  1993-01-30       Impact factor: 3.688

5.  Detection of both the normal and mutant alleles in single cells of individuals heterozygous for the sickle cell mutation--prelude to preimplantation diagnosis.

Authors:  M Monk; M R Kenealy; S Mohadjerani
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 3.050

6.  Simultaneous amplification of the two most frequent mutations of infantile Tay-Sachs disease in single blastomeres.

Authors:  K Sermon; W Lissens; Z P Nagy; A Van Steirteghem; I Liebaers
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 7.  Biopsy of cleavage stage human embryos and diagnosis of single gene defects by DNA amplification.

Authors:  K Hardy; A H Handyside
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 5.534

8.  Birth of a normal girl after in vitro fertilization and preimplantation diagnostic testing for cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  A H Handyside; J G Lesko; J J Tarín; R M Winston; M R Hughes
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-09-24       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for Tay-Sachs disease: successful pregnancy after pre-embryo biopsy and gene amplification by polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  W E Gibbons; S A Gitlin; S E Lanzendorf; R A Kaufmann; R N Slotnick; G D Hodgen
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Strategies to respond to polymerase chain reaction deoxyribonucleic acid amplification failure in a preimplantation genetic diagnosis program.

Authors:  W E Gibbons; S A Gitlin; S E Lanzendorf
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 8.661

View more
  6 in total

1.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis using fluorescent polymerase chain reaction: results and future developments.

Authors:  I Findlay; P Matthews; P Quirke
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 2.  Molecular diagnostics in preimplantation genetic diagnosis.

Authors:  Alan R Thornhill; Karen Snow
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.568

3.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis.

Authors:  Y Verlinsky
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Primer system for single cell detection of double mutation for Tay-Sachs disease.

Authors:  M C Liu; K C Drury; S Kipersztok; W Zheng; R S Williams
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  The single cell as a tool for genetic testing: credibility, precision, implication.

Authors:  Keren Dotan; Baruch Feldman; Boleslaw Goldman; Yehuda Peri; Leah Peleg
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Successful implantation and live birth of a healthy boy after triple biopsy and double vitrification of oocyte-embryo-blastocyst.

Authors:  Ermanno Greco; Anil Biricik; Rocio P Cotarelo; Elisabetta Iammarone; Patrizia Rubino; Jan Tesarik; Francesco Fiorentino; Maria Giulia Minasi
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2015-01-14
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.