Literature DB >> 8685314

Age and sex differences in the management of ischaemic heart disease.

F A Majeed1, D G Cook.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate age and sex differences in the utilisation of hospital services for ischaemic heart disease.
DESIGN: Analysis of routine mortality data and hospital activity data.
SETTING: South West Thames Regional Health Authority.
SUBJECTS: Residents of the South West Thames Regional Health Authority who in 1991 either died from ischaemic heart disease or were admitted to an NHS hospital in England and Wales with a main diagnosis of ischaemic heart disease. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Ratio of consultant episodes to deaths from ischaemic heart disease (as a proxy measure of the utilisation of hospital care), and the percentages of consultant episodes in which further investigation (angiography or catheterisation) or revascularisation treatment (coronary artery bypass grafting or angioplasty) were carried out.
RESULTS: The ratio of episodes to deaths was similar in men and women (odds ratio for men vs. women 0.96, 95% confidence intervals 0.90 to 1.03). The percentage of episodes in which further investigation was carried out was higher in men than women (odds ratio for men vs. women 1.46, 95% confidence intervals 1.25 to 1.70) as was the percentage of episodes in which revascularisation treatment was carried out (odds ratio for men vs. women 1.46, 95% confidence intervals 1.20 to 1.77). The ratio of episodes to deaths, the percentage of episodes in which further investigation was carried out, and the percentage of episodes in which revascularisation treatment was carried out all declined with age (all p values < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Women with ischaemic heart disease are as likely as men to be admitted to hospital, but after admission are less likely to undergo further investigation and revascularisation treatment. Elderly patients with ischaemic heart disease are less likely than younger patients to be admitted to hospital; after admission, they are also less likely to undergo further investigation and revascularisation treatment. Further research is needed to determine whether these age and sex differences in the use of hospital services are clinically justified.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8685314     DOI: 10.1016/s0033-3506(96)80027-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health        ISSN: 0033-3506            Impact factor:   2.427


  12 in total

1.  Sex differences in investigation results and treatment in subjects referred for investigation of chest pain.

Authors:  Y Wong; A Rodwell; S Dawkins; S A Livesey; I A Simpson
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Do race and gender influence the use of invasive procedures?

Authors:  R E Watson; A D Stein; F C Dwamena; J Kroll; R Mitra; B A McIntosh; P Vasilenko; M M Holmes-Rovner; Q Chen; J Kupersmith
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Age-related disparities in cancer screening: analysis of 2001 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data.

Authors:  Anthony F Jerant; Peter Franks; J Elizabeth Jackson; Mark P Doescher
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.166

4.  Social and gender variation in the prevalence, presentation and general practitioner provisional diagnosis of chest pain.

Authors:  H Richards; A McConnachie; C Morrison; K Murray; G Watt
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.710

5.  Gender differences in the management and outcome of patients with acute coronary artery disease.

Authors:  R A Raine; N A Black; T J Bowker; D A Wood
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.710

6.  Trends in colorectal cancer care in southern England, 1989-1993: using HES data to inform cancer services reviews.

Authors:  A M Pollock; N Vickers
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.710

7.  Are GP practice prescribing rates for coronary heart disease drugs equitable? A cross sectional analysis in four primary care trusts in England.

Authors:  P R Ward; P R Noyce; A S St Leger
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.710

8.  How equitable are GP practice prescribing rates for statins?: an ecological study in four primary care trusts in North West England.

Authors:  Paul R Ward; Peter R Noyce; Antony S St Leger
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2007-03-27

9.  Sex differences in use of interventional cardiology persist after risk adjustment.

Authors:  N Nante; G Messina; M Cecchini; O Bertetto; F Moirano; M McKee
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 3.710

10.  Cardiovascular Disease.

Authors:  Sherry L Grace; Rick Fry; Angela Cheung; Donna E Stewart
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2004-08-25       Impact factor: 2.809

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.