Literature DB >> 10942455

Social and gender variation in the prevalence, presentation and general practitioner provisional diagnosis of chest pain.

H Richards1, A McConnachie, C Morrison, K Murray, G Watt.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To describe the prevalence of Rose angina and non-exertional chest pain in men and women in socioeconomically contrasting areas; to describe the proportions of men and women who present with the symptom of chest pain and who receive a provisional general practitioner diagnosis of coronary heart disease; to assess the effects of gender and deprivation.
DESIGN: Two random general population samples in socially contrasting areas were surveyed using the Rose angina questionnaire: the case notes of people identified with chest pain were reviewed.
SETTING: Glasgow conurbation. PARTICIPANTS: 1107 men and women, aged 45-64, with chest pain. OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence of Rose angina and non-exertional chest pain; the proportions who had presented with chest pain and received a general practitioner's provisional diagnosis of coronary heart disease.
RESULTS: There was no difference between social groups in the prevalence of all chest pain but a greater proportion of those in deprived groups had Rose angina and a greater proportion of these had the more severe grade. The proportion of people who had presented with chest pain was higher among socioeconomically deprived groups but there was no difference in the proportions receiving a general practitioner provisional diagnosis of coronary heart disease. Men were more likely to present with chest pain than women and were more likely to receive a provisional general practitioner diagnosis of coronary heart disease.
CONCLUSIONS: No evidence was found of social differences in patient presentation or general practitioner diagnosis that might explain reported variations in uptake of cardiology services. In contrast, gender variation may originate in part from differences in patient presentation and general practitioner diagnosis. Further investigation of socioeconomic variations in uptake of cardiology services should focus later in the care pathway, on general practitioner referral patterns and clinical decisions taken in secondary care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10942455      PMCID: PMC1731754          DOI: 10.1136/jech.54.9.714

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health        ISSN: 0143-005X            Impact factor:   3.710


  27 in total

1.  Pre-existing ischaemic heart disease and ischaemic heart disease mortality in women compared with men.

Authors:  C L Hart; G C Watt; G Davey Smith; C R Gillis; V M Hawthorne
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 7.196

2.  Co-morbidity in general practice.

Authors:  Y T Wun; K Chan; A Lee
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.267

3.  Legibility of doctors' handwriting: quantitative comparative study.

Authors:  R Lyons; C Payne; M McCabe; C Fielder
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-09-26

4.  Sex differences in morbidity: a case of discrimination in general practice.

Authors:  G P Sayer; H Britt
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  The public health uses of the Scottish Community Health Index (CHI).

Authors:  J Womersley
Journal:  J Public Health Med       Date:  1996-12

6.  Another look at sex differences in the use of medical care: illness orientation and the types of morbidities for which services are used.

Authors:  J H Hibbard; C R Pope
Journal:  Women Health       Date:  1986

7.  Self-administration of a questionnaire on chest pain and intermittent claudication.

Authors:  G Rose; P McCartney; D D Reid
Journal:  Br J Prev Soc Med       Date:  1977-03

8.  Effect of socioeconomic group on incidence of, management of, and survival after myocardial infarction and coronary death: analysis of community coronary event register.

Authors:  C Morrison; M Woodward; W Leslie; H Tunstall-Pedoe
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-02-22

9.  Variations in use of cardiology services in a health authority: comparison of coronary artery revascularisation rates with prevalence of angina and coronary mortality.

Authors:  N Payne; C Saul
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-01-25

10.  Chest pain on questionnaire and prediction of major ischaemic heart disease events in men.

Authors:  F C Lampe; P H Whincup; S G Wannamethee; S Ebrahim; M Walker; A G Shaper
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 29.983

View more
  14 in total

1.  Valuable insights from morbidity coding in primary care.

Authors:  Tom Fahey
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-04-23

2.  Socioeconomic gradients in the prevalence of cardiovascular disease in Scotland: the roles of composition and context.

Authors:  Alastair H Leyland
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  Rose Angina Questionnaire: validation with cardiologists' diagnoses to detect coronary heart disease in Bangladesh.

Authors:  Muhammad Aziz Rahman; Nicola Spurrier; Mohammad Afzal Mahmood; Mahmudur Rahman; Sohel Reza Choudhury; Stephen Leeder
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2012-09-12

4.  A population study of the long-term consequences of Rose angina: 20-year follow-up of the Renfrew-Paisley study.

Authors:  N F Murphy; S Stewart; C L Hart; K MacIntyre; D Hole; J J V McMurray
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2006-06-28       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Socioeconomic variations in responses to chest pain: qualitative study.

Authors:  Helen Mary Richards; Margaret Elspeth Reid; Graham Charles Murray Watt
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-06-01

6.  Chest pain and subsequent consultation for coronary heart disease: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Peter R Croft; Elaine Thomas
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 7.  The conundrum of detecting stable angina pectoris in the community setting.

Authors:  Mary Russell; Marie Williams; Esther May; Simon Stewart
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 32.419

8.  Increased mortality among women with Rose angina who have not presented with ischaemic heart disease.

Authors:  Vicci Owen-Smith; Philip C Hannaford; Alison M Elliott
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  Prognosis of angina with and without a diagnosis: 11 year follow up in the Whitehall II prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Harry Hemingway; Martin Shipley; Annie Britton; Michael Page; Peter Macfarlane; Michael Marmot
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-10-18

10.  Unmet health needs in patients with coronary heart disease: implications and potential for improvement in caring services.

Authors:  Mohsen Asadi-Lari; Chris Packham; David Gray
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2003-07-23       Impact factor: 3.186

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.