Literature DB >> 8683796

Outcome analysis of the modified Mathieu hypospadias repair: comparison of stented and unstented repairs.

S Hakim1, P A Merguerian, R Rabinowitz, L D Shortliffe, P H McKenna.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We compared surgical outcomes of stented and unstented Mathieu repairs in boys with primary distal hypospadias, and evaluated the efficacy and safety of caudal analgesia relative to other forms of analgesia (penile block and epidural analgesia).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 336 consecutive boys who underwent the modified Mathieu repair for primary distal hypospadias. A urethral stent was placed in 114 patients and nonstented repair was performed in 222. Adjunct caudal analgesia was given in 136 cases, a penile block in 158 and continuous epidural analgesia in 42.
RESULTS: None of the unstented cases had urinary retention. Analysis of surgical outcomes revealed no difference in fistula formation between patients with and without stents (2.63 versus 2.70%, respectively, p > 0.999). Overall complication rates in the stented and unstented groups were not significantly different (2.63 versus 3.60%, respectively, p = 0.756). The fistula rate in patients who received adjunct caudal analgesia was no different than in those who received other forms of adjunct analgesia (2.21 versus 3.0%, respectively, p > 0.999).
CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that successful Mathieu hypospadias repair is independent of the use of a stent. Caudal analgesia, a penile block and epidural analgesia provided effective postoperative pain control with no difference in complication rates. To our knowledge our report represents the largest observational study reported to date comparing stented and unstented repairs. However, because of the small number of complications in each group, a much larger study is required to determine statistically significant differences among these groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8683796     DOI: 10.1097/00005392-199608001-00081

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  14 in total

1.  Pediatric Urologic Surgery: Reducing Opioid Use.

Authors:  Ryan Nelson; Tim Shimon; Gwen M Grimsby
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2021-07-31       Impact factor: 3.022

2.  Postoperative complications of hypospadias repair in patients receiving caudal block vs. non-caudal anesthesia: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Patrick Pine Tanseco; Harkanwal Randhawa; Michael Erlano Chua; Udi Blankstein; Jin Kyu Kim; Melissa McGrath; Armando J Lorenzo; Luis H Braga
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 3.  Choosing the Right Catheter for Pediatric Procedures: Patient Considerations and Preference.

Authors:  Chad Crigger; Jake Kuzbel; Osama Al-Omar
Journal:  Res Rep Urol       Date:  2021-04-28

4.  Distal hypospadias repair in infants without a postoperative stent.

Authors:  David J Chalmers; Georgette L Siparsky; Cole A Wiedel; Duncan T Wilcox
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 1.827

5.  Overnight urethral stenting after tubularized incised plate urethroplasty for distal hypospadias.

Authors:  Chad R Ritch; Alana M Murphy; Solomon L Woldu; Elizabeth A Reiley; Terry W Hensle
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2010-04-24       Impact factor: 1.827

6.  Nonstented tubularized incised plate urethroplasty with Y-to-I spongioplasty in non-toilet trained children.

Authors:  Fayez Almodhen; Ahmed Alzahrani; Roman Jednak; Jean Paul Capolicchio; Mohamed T El Sherbiny
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.862

7.  Hypospadias repair and glans augmentation using a modified Mathieu technique.

Authors:  Behtash Ghazi Nezami; Amir Hassan Mahboubi; Roozbeh Tanhaeivash; Ali Tourchi; Abdol Mohammad Kajbafzadeh
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.827

8.  Penile block is associated with less urinary retention than caudal anesthesia in distal hypospadia repair in children.

Authors:  Martin Lothar Metzelder; J F Kuebler; S Glueer; R Suempelmann; B M Ure; C Petersen
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2009-05-23       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Does the type of urinary diversion affect the result of distal hypospadias repair? A prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Mohamed Radwan; Mohamed Gaber Soliman; Ahmed Tawfik; Mohamed Abo-Elenen; Mohamed El-Benday
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2012-08

10.  General considerations in hypospadias surgery.

Authors:  Amilal Bhat
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2008-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.