Literature DB >> 22852026

Does the type of urinary diversion affect the result of distal hypospadias repair? A prospective randomized trial.

Mohamed Radwan1, Mohamed Gaber Soliman, Ahmed Tawfik, Mohamed Abo-Elenen, Mohamed El-Benday.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this review is to evaluate different techniques in urinary diversion and urethral stenting in hypospadias surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The surgical procedure included 192 tubularized incised plate (TIP) repairs for distal penile hypospadias. The patients were prospectively randomized into three groups: In group A, a urethral catheter was used as a stent and for diversion of urine (63 patients); in group B we use no urethral stenting (63 patients), only a suprapubic catheter; and in group C we use a suprapubic diversion and we put a small catheter in the anterior urethra only (66 patients). The urethral catheter was removed in group A at the 6th-7th postoperative day and in group C the urethral stent was removed at the 3rd-4th postoperative day. The suprapubic catheter was removed in both groups B and C at the 7th-9th postoperative day. All patients received an injection of antibiotics in the morning of the operation and daily until the day of catheter removal. All of the operations were performed by the same surgeon.
RESULTS: The mean ages of our patients were 3, 5, and 5 years in groups A, B, and C, respectively. The mean hospital stay was 5 days (3-8). Follow-up ranged from 8 to 48 months (mean of 21.5 ± 10.1 months). Bladder spasm was observed in 33% of our patients in group A while there were no cases of spasm in the other two groups with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05). Fistula was reported in eight patients (12.7%) of our urethral catheter group A, while it was observed in three patients (2.3%) of our suprapubic diversion groups B and C with a statistically significant difference between the two groups (p < 0.05). Meatal stenosis was reported in eight patients in group B (12.7%; nonstented group) versus three patients of both groups A and C (2.4%; stented groups) with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Suprapubic diversion is an important step in hypospadias repair as it provides a better success rate with a significantly lower rate of occurrence of fistula. However, the addition of a stent in the anterior urethra to suprapubic diversion avoids the development of meatal stenosis and also avoids the bladder spasm observed with a urethral catheter.

Entities:  

Keywords:  diversion; hypospadias; tubularized incised plate

Year:  2012        PMID: 22852026      PMCID: PMC3398600          DOI: 10.1177/1756287212448111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ther Adv Urol        ISSN: 1756-2872


  17 in total

1.  Urinary diversion in hypospadias surgery 1987.

Authors:  J E Oesterling; J P Gearhart; R D Jeffs
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Tubularized, incised plate urethroplasty for distal hypospadias.

Authors:  W Snodgrass
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Urethral catheterization in hypospadias surgery: Should the device enter the bladder or be made a urethral stent?

Authors:  I S Arda; M Mahmutoğlu
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.545

4.  Further experience with the tubularized-incised urethral plate technique for hypospadias repair.

Authors:  A Elbakry
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.588

5.  Healing of unstented tubularized incised plate urethroplasty: an experimental study in a rabbit model.

Authors:  A T Hafez; D Herz; D Bägli; C R Smith; G McLorie; A E Khoury
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.588

6.  Outpatient catheterless modified Mathieu hypospadias repair.

Authors:  R Rabinowitz
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Successful hypospadias repair in infants using brief urinary diversion and watertight neourethral closure.

Authors:  M Maizels; C F Firlit
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Nonstented tubularized incised plate urethroplasty with Y-to-I spongioplasty in non-toilet trained children.

Authors:  Fayez Almodhen; Ahmed Alzahrani; Roman Jednak; Jean Paul Capolicchio; Mohamed T El Sherbiny
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.862

9.  Distal hypospadias: which repair?

Authors:  M Samuel; S Capps; A Worthy
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 5.588

10.  Unstented tubularized incised plate urethroplasty combined with foreskin reconstruction for distal hypospadias.

Authors:  Marc-David Leclair; Caroline Camby; Simon Battisti; Géraldine Renaud; Valérie Plattner; Yves Heloury
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 20.096

View more
  4 in total

1.  Outcome of stented versus unstented mid-shaft to distal hypospadias repair.

Authors:  Tariq Burki; A Wahab Al Hams; Ahmed Nazer; Abdulrahman Mojallid; Abdelazim Abasher; Yasser Jamalalail; Fayez Al Modhen; Ahmed Al Shammari
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2022-02-15

2.  Incised urethral diversion reduces the rate of fistula after one-stage hypospadias repair: a single-center retrospective controlled study.

Authors:  Chenglong Wang; Ning Ma; Weixin Wang; Yori Endo; Wen Chen; Senkai Li
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Complications of hypospadias surgery: Experience in a tertiary hospital of a developing country.

Authors:  William Appeadu-Mensah; Afua Adwo Jectey Hesse; Hope Glover-Addy; Samuel Osei-Nketiah; Victor Etwire; Pokua Ama Sarpong
Journal:  Afr J Paediatr Surg       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec

4.  A Comparative Study on the Outcomes of Hypospadias Surgery Following Early Versus Late Bladder Catheter Removal.

Authors:  Anurodh Kumar; Ishwar Ram Dhayal
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-06-20
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.