Literature DB >> 30526802

Postoperative complications of hypospadias repair in patients receiving caudal block vs. non-caudal anesthesia: A meta-analysis.

Patrick Pine Tanseco1, Harkanwal Randhawa2, Michael Erlano Chua1,3, Udi Blankstein2, Jin Kyu Kim3,4, Melissa McGrath2, Armando J Lorenzo3,4, Luis H Braga2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: We performed a meta-analysis of the current literature to assess the association of caudal block and postoperative complication rates following hypospadias repair.
METHODS: A Systematic literature search was conducted on October 2017. Five reviewers independently screened, identified, and evaluated comparative studies assessing postoperative outcomes following hypospadias repair with and without caudal block. The incidence of post-surgical complications from each study was extracted for caudal block and control groups to generate the odds ratio (OR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). Effect estimates were pooled using inverse-variance method with random-effects model. Subgroup analyses were performed according to study type and hypospadias severity.
RESULTS: Nine studies (2096patients) of low- to moderate-quality were included for meta-analysis. Overall pooled effect estimates demonstrated increased occurrence of postoperative complication rates among patients with caudal block (OR 2.32; 95% CI 1.29-4.16). Subgroup analysis according to hypospadias severity revealed that a significant increased OR in complication rate was noted among proximal hypospadias (OR 3.55; 95% CI 1.80-7.01), but not distal hypospadias (OR 1.31; 95% CI 0.59-2.88).
CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis of poor-quality evidence may have revealed a significant association between caudal block and postoperative complications following hypospadias repair. However, subgroup analysis demonstrated that hypospadias severity is important in determining complication rates, suggesting that confounding factors and selection bias may play a central role in characterizing the true effect of the anesthesia approach.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 30526802      PMCID: PMC6737734          DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.5688

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J        ISSN: 1911-6470            Impact factor:   1.862


  16 in total

1.  Surgical outcome in children undergoing hypospadias repair under caudal epidural vs penile block.

Authors:  Pankaj Kundra; Kotteeswaran Yuvaraj; Karoon Agrawal; Sudeep Krishnappa; Lalla T Kumar
Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 2.556

2.  A retrospective evaluation of fistula formation in children undergoing hypospadias repair and caudal anesthesia.

Authors:  Leonie Kreysing; Claudia Höhne
Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.556

3.  Longer than expected-duration of caudal analgesia with two different doses of levobupivacaine in children undergoing hypospadias repair.

Authors:  Karl-Christian Thies; Jacques Driessen; Hing Gwan Kho; Karen Kwak; Jacqueline Knoll; Robert de Gier; Wouter Feitz
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 1.830

4.  Editorial Comment.

Authors:  Bishr Haydar
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Comparing caudal and penile nerve blockade using bupivacaine in hypospadias repair surgeries in children.

Authors:  Mahin Seyedhejazi; Rasoul Azerfarin; Fahime Kazemi; Maryam Amiri
Journal:  Afr J Paediatr Surg       Date:  2011 Sep-Dec

6.  Cause and Effect versus Confounding-Is There a True Association between Caudal Blocks and Tubularized Incised Plate Repair Complications?

Authors:  Luis H Braga; Kizanee Jegatheeswaran; Melissa McGrath; Bethany Easterbrook; Mandy Rickard; Jorge DeMaria; Armando J Lorenzo
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 7.  Preoperative hormonal stimulation effect on hypospadias repair complications: Meta-analysis of observational versus randomized controlled studies.

Authors:  Michael E Chua; Michele Gnech; Jessica M Ming; Jan Michael Silangcruz; Stephanie Sanger; Roberto Iglesias Lopes; Armando J Lorenzo; Luis H Braga
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2017-07-29       Impact factor: 1.830

8.  Urethrocutaneous fistula following hypospadias repair: regional anesthesia and other factors.

Authors:  Raza H Zaidi; Nina F Casanova; Bishr Haydar; Terri Voepel-Lewis; Julian H Wan
Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 2.556

Review 9.  Hypospadias: Are we as good as we think when we correct proximal hypospadias?

Authors:  C J Long; D A Canning
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 1.830

10.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

Authors:  David Moher; Alessandro Liberati; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  1 in total

1.  Ultrasound-guided dorsal penile nerve block is a safe block in hypospadias surgery: A retrospective clinical study.

Authors:  Doğakan Yiğit; Volkan Özen; Aliye Kandirici; Ali İhsan Dokucu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 1.817

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.