Literature DB >> 8683581

Refined structure of lac repressor headpiece (1-56) determined by relaxation matrix calculations from 2D and 3D NOE data: change of tertiary structure upon binding to the lac operator.

M Slijper1, A M Bonvin, R Boelens, R Kaptein.   

Abstract

The solution structure of the DNA binding domain of lac repressor (headpiece 1-56; HP56) has been refined using data from 2D and 3D NMR spectroscopy. The structure was derived from 1546 restraints (giving an average of 27.6 per residue), comprising 389 intraresidual, 402 sequential, 385 medium range and 325 long range distance restraints and also 30 phi and 15 chi 1 dihedral angle restraints. The structures were determined by the method of direct refinement against nuclear Overhauser enhancement peak volumes with the program DINOSAUR. The final set of 32 selected structures displayed an r.m.s. deviation from the average of 0.43(+/-0.08) A angstroms (backbone) and 0.95(+/-0.08) angstroms (all heavy atoms) for the best defined region of the protein (residues 3 to 49). The ensemble R-factor was 0.35, which indicates close correspondence with the experimental data. The structures revealed good stereochemical qualities. The conformations of the NMR structures of free and DNA complexed lac repressor headpiece were compared. The regions comprising the secondary structure elements show close correspondence for both conformations. However, the conformation of the loop between helix II and III changes considerably upon complexation of the headpiece. This change in the conformation of the loop in lac HP56 is essential for binding of the side-chains of residues Asn25 and His29 to the lac operator DNA. Finally, the lac headpiece residues that are intolerant to mutations were analysed. Most of these mutation-sensitive residues are important for a correct folding of the headpiece region, and a number of these residues are also involved in contacting the operator DNA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8683581     DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0356

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  15 in total

1.  Plasticity of quaternary structure: twenty-two ways to form a LacI dimer.

Authors:  L Swint-Kruse; C R Elam; J W Lin; D R Wycuff; K Shive Matthews
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Completeness of NOEs in protein structure: a statistical analysis of NMR.

Authors:  J F Doreleijers; M L Raves; T Rullmann; R Kaptein
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.835

3.  Radiolysis of lac repressor by gamma-rays and heavy ions: a two-hit model for protein inactivation.

Authors:  Michel Charlier; Séverine Eon; Edouard Sèche; Serge Bouffard; Françoise Culard; Mélanie Spotheim-Maurizot
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Plasticity in protein-DNA recognition: lac repressor interacts with its natural operator 01 through alternative conformations of its DNA-binding domain.

Authors:  Charalampos G Kalodimos; Alexandre M J J Bonvin; Roberto K Salinas; Rainer Wechselberger; Rolf Boelens; Robert Kaptein
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2002-06-17       Impact factor: 11.598

5.  Structure of the apo form of the catabolite control protein A (CcpA) from Bacillus megaterium with a DNA-binding domain.

Authors:  Rajesh Kumar Singh; Gottfried J Palm; Santosh Panjikar; Winfried Hinrichs
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Cryst Commun       Date:  2007-03-12

6.  Cooperation between an intrinsically disordered region and a helical segment is required for ubiquitin-independent degradation by the proteasome.

Authors:  Sandra P Melo; Karen W Barbour; Franklin G Berger
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Comparison of simulated and experimentally determined dynamics for a variant of the Lacl DNA-binding domain, Nlac-P.

Authors:  L Swint-Kruse; K S Matthews; P E Smith; B M Pettitt
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Improved HSQC experiments for the observation of exchange broadened signals.

Authors:  F A Mulder; C A Spronk; M Slijper; R Kaptein; R Boelens
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 2.835

Review 9.  Biomolecular Assemblies: Moving from Observation to Predictive Design.

Authors:  Corey J Wilson; Andreas S Bommarius; Julie A Champion; Yury O Chernoff; David G Lynn; Anant K Paravastu; Chen Liang; Ming-Chien Hsieh; Jennifer M Heemstra
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 60.622

10.  Ligand-induced conformational changes and conformational dynamics in the solution structure of the lactose repressor protein.

Authors:  Marc Taraban; Hongli Zhan; Andrew E Whitten; David B Langley; Kathleen S Matthews; Liskin Swint-Kruse; Jill Trewhella
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 5.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.