Literature DB >> 8681865

Laser-evoked potentials: exogenous and endogenous components.

R Siedenberg1, R D Treede.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to distinguish the exogenous component (related to the physical properties of the stimulus) and the endogenous component (reflecting event-related cognitive processing) of the laser-evoked potential (LEP). Short painful radiant heat pulses generated by a CO2-laser were applied to the dorsum of the right and left foot. LEPs were recorded with 5 scalp electrodes in the midline versus linked earlobes in 26 healthy subjects. In order to identify the exogenous component, the LEP was recorded during a standardised distraction task (reading a short story). To identify the endogenous component P3 for the LEP, a 2-stimulus oddball paradigm was used (20% probability of targets). When the task of the oddball paradigm consisted of pressing a button, a movement-related long-latency negativity (N 1200) was recorded in frontal leads that was absent in a counting task. The LEP of targets, frequent non-targets and during distraction was dominated by a single large positivity. The amplitude of this positivity was task-dependent and increased the more attention the subject payed to the laser stimuli (distraction < neutral < non-target < target). The laser-evoked positivity during distraction had a peak latency of about 400 msec (P400) and a maximum amplitude at the vertex, which was independent of inter-stimulus interval. The P3 following laser stimulation had a significantly later peak at about 570 msec (P570) and a different scalp topography with a parietal maximum. Its amplitude decreased when the interstimulus interval was reduced from 10 to 6 sec. Under neutral instructions, the LEP positivity consisted of a superposition of both the exogenous P 400 and the endogenous P570.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8681865     DOI: 10.1016/0168-5597(95)00255-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  11 in total

1.  Excitability of the Adelta nociceptive pathways as assessed by the recovery cycle of laser evoked potentials in humans.

Authors:  A Truini; P Rossi; F Galeotti; A Romaniello; M Virtuoso; C De Lena; M Leandri; G Cruccu
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-01-17       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Pain networks from the inside: Spatiotemporal analysis of brain responses leading from nociception to conscious perception.

Authors:  Hélène Bastuji; Maud Frot; Caroline Perchet; Michel Magnin; Luis Garcia-Larrea
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Somatosensory spatial attention modulates amplitudes, latencies, and latency jitter of laser-evoked brain potentials.

Authors:  Marcel Franz; Moritz M Nickel; Alexander Ritter; Wolfgang H R Miltner; Thomas Weiss
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Spatial attention to thermal pain stimuli in subjects with visual spatial hemi-neglect: extinction, mislocalization and misidentification of stimulus modality.

Authors:  C C Liu; D S Veldhuijzen; S Ohara; J Winberry; J D Greenspan; F A Lenz
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 6.961

5.  Dipole source analyses of laser evoked potentials obtained from subdural grid recordings from primary somatic sensory cortex.

Authors:  Ulf Baumgärtner; Hagen Vogel; Shinji Ohara; Rolf-Detlef Treede; Fred Lenz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 6.  Roles of the hippocampal formation in pain information processing.

Authors:  Ming-Gang Liu; Jun Chen
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 5.203

7.  Characterizing pinprick-evoked brain potentials before and after experimentally induced secondary hyperalgesia.

Authors:  Emanuel N van den Broeke; André Mouraux; Antonia H Groneberg; Doreen B Pfau; Rolf-Detlef Treede; Thomas Klein
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Attention to pain is processed at multiple cortical sites in man.

Authors:  Shinji Ohara; Nathan E Crone; Nirit Weiss; Hagen Vogel; Rolf-Detlef Treede; Fred A Lenz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-05-04       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  A painful cutaneous laser stimulus evokes responses from single neurons in the human thalamic principal somatic sensory nucleus ventral caudal (Vc).

Authors:  K Kobayashi; J Winberry; C C Liu; R D Treede; F A Lenz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Neural Mechanisms of Attentional Switching Between Pain and a Visual Illusion Task: A Laser Evoked Potential Study.

Authors:  Andrej Stancak; Nicholas Fallon; Alessandra Fenu; Katerina Kokmotou; Vicente Soto; Stephanie Cook
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 3.020

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.