Literature DB >> 8671396

A comparative analysis of embryo implantation potential in patients with severe teratozoospermia undergoing in-vitro fertilization with a high insemination concentration or intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

S Oehninger1, T F Kruger, T Simon, D Jones, J Mayer, S Lanzendorf, J P Toner, S J Muasher.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess fertilization, implantation and pregnancy rates in infertile patients with severe teratozoospermia [P (poor prognosis) pattern sperm morphology assessed by strict criteria] treated by in-vitro fertilization (IVF) using a high insemination concentration (HIC), or by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). This was a retrospective cohort study performed in an academic tertiary institution. The outcome of 115 consecutive ICSI cycles was compared to that of a similar number of cycles of IVF with HIC performed during a similar time frame and matched by woman's age and basal serum (cycle day 3) follicle stimulating hormone concentrations. The inclusion criteria were sperm morphology </=4% normal forms (P pattern) and >/=1x10(6) total motile spermatozoa per ejaculate. The diploid fertilization rate in the HIC-IVF group was 86% and in the ICSI group 68% (P < 0.05). Importantly, an equal number of embryos was transferred to both groups of patients. The morphological quality of the embryos (proportion of transfers having superior morphology embryo scores) was significantly better in the ICSI group than in the patients receiving HIC-IVF. Although there was a clear trend for better implantation and pregnancy rates in the ICSI group, these differences were not statistically significant. We conclude that, although HIC-IVF resulted in a higher fertilization rate than ICSI in patients with severe teratozoospermia, ICSI produced a significantly higher proportion of morphologically superior embryos with a tendency towards a higher implantation potential. Therefore, teratozoospermic patients having adequate numbers of motile spermatozoa should be offered ICSI as an alternative to modified (HIC) IVF treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8671396     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019302

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  12 in total

1.  Intracytoplasmic sperm injection increases embryo fragmentation without affecting clinical outcome.

Authors:  J L Frattarelli; M P Leondires; B T Miller; J H Segars
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Acrosome index is not an absolute predictor of the outcome following conventional in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

Authors:  B Söderlund; K Lundin
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  An evaluation of the efficacy of in vitro fertilization with intracytoplasmic sperm injection for sperm with low hypoosmotic swelling test scores and poor morphology.

Authors:  Matthew Check; Jerome H Check; Donna Summers-Chase; Kimberly Swenson; Wei Yuan
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Effects of reducing insemination time in human in vitro fertilization and embryo development by using sibling oocytes.

Authors:  S Coskun; G L Roca; A M Elnour; H al Mayman; J M Hollanders; K A Jaroudi
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Fertilization, embryo quality, and cryosurvival in in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles.

Authors:  J M Moilanen; M Tulppala; I Reima; O Hovatta
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Sperm single-stranded DNA, detected by acridine orange staining, reduces fertilization and quality of ICSI-derived embryos.

Authors:  Irma Virant-Klun; Tomaz Tomazevic; Helena Meden-Vrtovec
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Comparison of embryo quality between intracytoplasmic sperm injection and in vitro fertilization in sibling oocytes.

Authors:  R Yoeli; R Orvieto; J Ashkenazi; M Shelef; Z Ben-Rafael; I Bar-Hava
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2008-01-19       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Optimization of IVF pregnancy outcomes with donor spermatozoa.

Authors:  Jeff G Wang; Nataki C Douglas; Robert Prosser; Daniel Kort; Janet M Choi; Mark V Sauer
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 9.  Role of Abnormal Sperm Morphology in Predicting Pregnancy Outcomes.

Authors:  Samuel A Shabtaie; Sabrina A Gerkowicz; Taylor P Kohn; Ranjith Ramasamy
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.092

10.  Assisting in vitro fertilization by manipulating cumulus-oocyte-complexes either mechanically or enzymatically does not prevent IVF failure.

Authors:  Thomas Ebner; Marianne Moser; Omar Shebl; Richard Mayer; Gernot Tews
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2011-09-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.