Literature DB >> 8669971

Writing and marking examinations for paediatrics.

G Clayden1.   

Abstract

Examinations are an essential element of medical education, which generates vehement debate but unfortunately a relative lack of rigorous critical analysis. There appears to be a background anxiety that research findings that might suggest an examination has been less than fair will lead to endless arguments with candidates who have failed that examination. It is a major responsibility of all those involved in examining to seek evidence of the fairness, reliability, and validity of the methods and the organisation of the tests. Computers have made analysis of results much easier. Access to shared banks of all types of questions and answer sheets should allow examiners to select the subject first and the assessment tool second but from a range of tested and continually modified questions which allow comparison of candidates' performance both in time and between institutions. The creation of examination materials and their evaluation must be considered as valuable an activity as research in academic life. There is little point in child health research if the advances in knowledge and skills that this generates cannot be shown to have been acquired eventually by present and future paediatricians.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8669971      PMCID: PMC1511541          DOI: 10.1136/adc.74.5.469

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dis Child        ISSN: 0003-9888            Impact factor:   3.791


  14 in total

1.  Structured short-answer questions: an alternative examination method.

Authors:  R H Webber
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 6.251

2.  Assessment of clinical competence using objective structured examination.

Authors:  R M Harden; M Stevenson; W W Downie; G M Wilson
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1975-02-22

3.  Multiple choice questions: to guess or not to guess.

Authors:  R McG Harden; R A Brown; L A Biran; W P Ross; R E Wakeford
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  1976-01       Impact factor: 6.251

4.  The observed long-case in clinical assessment.

Authors:  D I Newble
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 6.251

5.  Reliability and validity of the objective structured clinical examination in paediatrics.

Authors:  D G Matsell; N M Wolfish; E Hsu
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 6.251

6.  Preclinical anxiety: the stress associated with a viva voce examination.

Authors:  C B Arndt; U M Guly; I C McManus
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 6.251

7.  Modified essay questions: are they worth the effort?

Authors:  G I Feletti; E K Smith
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 6.251

8.  Objective structured clinical examination compared with other forms of student assessment.

Authors:  L J Smith; D A Price; I B Houston
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 3.791

9.  Constructing multiple choice questions of the multiple true/false type.

Authors:  R M Harden
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 6.251

10.  The oral examination as a measure of professional competence.

Authors:  C H McGuire
Journal:  J Med Educ       Date:  1966-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.