Literature DB >> 8668511

No prevalence of right-left over top-bottom spatial codes.

B Hommel1.   

Abstract

Reaction time is known to depend on spatial stimulus-response compatibility in both the horizontal and the vertical dimensions. However, if both dimensions are varied in the same task, horizontal but not vertical compatibility affects performance, even if subjects are instructed to attend to the vertical dimension only (Nicoletti & Umiltà, 1984). Experiment 1 compared the effect of horizontal and vertical instructions in a task with left-versus right-handed key responses placed at a top versus bottom location. A horizontal-prevalence effect was observed only with a horizontal, and not with a vertical, instruction. This suggests that subjects might not have heeded the vertical instruction in the Nicoletti and Umiltà study but instead attended to the horizontal dimension. Experiment 2 did not yield any horizontal prevalence with one-handed responses (joystick movements). This indicates that top-bottom codes become ineffective only if the responses suggest an exclusively horizontal response coding. In sum, results demonstrated multiple spatial coding of stimuli and responses under appropriate conditions and suggest that the right-left codes do not dominate the top-bottom spatial codes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8668511     DOI: 10.3758/bf03205480

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  18 in total

1.  Auditory S-R compatibility: the effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing.

Authors:  J R Simon; A P Rudell
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  1967-06

2.  Why are left-right spatial codes easier to form than above-below ones?

Authors:  R Nicoletti; C Umiltà; E P Tressoldi; C A Marzi
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1988-03

3.  On the generality of logical recoding in spatial interference tasks.

Authors:  U Arend; J Wandmacher
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1987-08

4.  S-R compatibility and the idea of a response code.

Authors:  R J Wallace
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1971-06

5.  Processing of an irrelevant location dimension as a function of the relevant stimulus dimension.

Authors:  C H Lu; R W Proctor
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Conditional and unconditional automaticity: a dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence.

Authors:  R De Jong; C C Liang; E Lauber
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  The Simon effect and visual motion.

Authors:  W H Ehrenstein
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1994

8.  Must egocentric and environmental frames of reference be aligned to produce spatial S-R compatibility effects?

Authors:  E Ladavas; M Moscovitch
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Right-left prevalence in spatial compatibility.

Authors:  R Nicoletti; C Umiltà
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1984-04

10.  The lateral coding of rotations: a study of the simon effect with wheel-rotation responses.

Authors:  Y Guiard
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 1.328

View more
  14 in total

1.  Experimental disentangling of spatial-compatibility and interhemispheric-relay effects in simple reaction time (Poffenberger paradigm).

Authors:  Claude M J Braun; Caroline Larocque; André Achim
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-04-20       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Right-left prevalence with task-irrelevant spatial codes.

Authors:  Sandro Rubichi; Roberto Nicoletti; Carlo Umiltà
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2004-02-04

3.  Evidence for gating of direct response activation in the Simon task.

Authors:  Peter Wühr
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-04

Review 4.  Spatial coding in two dimensions.

Authors:  Sandro Rubichi; Kim-Phuong L Vu; Roberto Nicoletti; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-04

5.  Effects of precuing horizontal and vertical dimensions on right-left prevalence.

Authors:  Robert W Proctor; Iring Koch; Kim-Phuong L Vu
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-06

6.  Advance task preparation reduces task error rate in the cuing task-switching paradigm.

Authors:  Nachshon Meiran; Alex Daichman
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-10

7.  Influence of display type and cue format on task-cuing effects: dissociating switch cost and right-left prevalence effects.

Authors:  Robert W Proctor; Iring Koch; Kim-Phuong L Vu; Motonori Yamaguchi
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-07

8.  Influence of auditory and audiovisual stimuli on the right-left prevalence effect.

Authors:  Kim-Phuong L Vu; Katsumi Minakata; Mary Kim Ngo
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-10-06

9.  Control-display alignment determines the prevalent compatibility effect in two-dimensional stimulus-response tasks.

Authors:  Samuel Lee; James D Miles; Kim-Phuong L Vu
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-04

10.  Somatotopic representation of location: evidence from the Simon effect.

Authors:  Jared Medina; Michael McCloskey; H Branch Coslett; Brenda Rapp
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.