Literature DB >> 8189193

Processing of an irrelevant location dimension as a function of the relevant stimulus dimension.

C H Lu1, R W Proctor.   

Abstract

The effect of an irrelevant location dimension on choice reactions to the relevant stimulus dimension was examined. Experiment 1 used variations of the spatial Stroop task and the Simon task that differed in whether the relevant dimension (location name or color) was similar to the irrelevant location dimension. Congruity of the stimulus dimensions and stimulus-response (S-R) mapping had additive effects in the Simon task but overadditive effects in the Stroop task. Experiments 2-4 showed that each pattern could be obtained for both tasks, suggesting that dimensional similarity is not crucial; overadditivity occurred only when stimulus identification was prolonged. The results can be interpreted in terms of the relative timing of activation for the relevant and irrelevant information, if it is assumed that the activation function for irrelevant location varies across different stimulus-response mappings.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8189193

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  17 in total

1.  Processing irrelevant location information: practice and transfer effects in choice-reaction tasks.

Authors:  R W Proctor; C H Lu
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-01

Review 2.  Stimulus and response representations underlying orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility effects.

Authors:  Yang Seok Cho; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-03

Review 3.  Stimulus-response compatibility and psychological refractory period effects: implications for response selection.

Authors:  Mei-Ching Lien; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-06

4.  Implicitly strengthened task-irrelevant stimulus-response associations modulate cognitive control: Evidence from an fMRI study.

Authors:  Tiansheng Xia; Hui Li; Ling Wang
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Spatial S-R compatibility effects in an intentional imitation task.

Authors:  Cecilia Heyes; Elizabeth Ray
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-08

6.  Anti-pointing is mediated by a perceptual bias of target location in left and right visual space.

Authors:  Matthew Heath; Anika Maraj; Ashlee Gradkowski; Gordon Binsted
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects.

Authors:  C H Lu; R W Proctor
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1995-06

8.  Reaction time distribution analysis of spatial correspondence effects.

Authors:  Robert W Proctor; James D Miles; Giulia Baroni
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-04

9.  No prevalence of right-left over top-bottom spatial codes.

Authors:  B Hommel
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-01

10.  Transfer of learning in choice reactions: The roles of stimulus type, response mode, and set-level compatibility.

Authors:  Motonori Yamaguchi; Jing Chen; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.