Literature DB >> 8661640

Comparison of self-expanding polyethylene terephthalate and metallic stents implanted in porcine iliac arteries.

K Wilczek1, I D Scheerder, K Wang, E Verbeken, J Piessens.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Comparison of the biocompatibility of self-expanding polyethylene terephthalate (PET) stents with self-expanding metallic stents (Wallstents).
METHODS: Diameter- and length-matched PET stents and Wallstents were symmetrically implanted in the paired iliac arteries of 13 crossbred domestic swine. Stent deployment was studied angiographically and with intravascular ultrasound immediately after stent implantation. The angiographic stented lumen diameter was measured using quantitative vessel analysis before, immediately after stenting, and at 6-week follow-up. Cross-section histopathology and area morphometry were performed.
RESULTS: Immediately poststenting, intravascular ultrasound revealed proximal dislocation of 5 of the 13 PET stents, whereas all metal stents were firmly embedded at the implantation site. At 6-week follow-up, three of the remaining PET stents were totally or subtotally occluded by organized thrombus, whereas all metal stents were patent. Compared with immediately poststenting, the angiographic lumen diameter within the five remaining PET stents was reduced by 30%, and that of the metallic stents was virtually unaltered (p < 0.02). This observation was confirmed by postmortem morphometry, wherein the PET-stented vessel segments a diameter stenosis of 40% was measured vs only 9% in the metallic stents (p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION: PET-stent deployment is difficult to control due to the lack of radiopacity of this stent. PET stents seem to be more thrombogenic and lead to significantly more neointimal proliferation than metallic stents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8661640     DOI: 10.1007/bf02577615

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol        ISSN: 0174-1551            Impact factor:   2.740


  9 in total

1.  Stenting of venous bypass grafts: a new treatment modality for patients who are poor candidates for reintervention.

Authors:  I K de Scheerder; B H Strauss; P J de Feyter; K J Beatt; L H Baur; W Wijns; G R Heyndrix; H Suryapranata; M van den Brand; B Buis
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 4.749

2.  Emergency stenting for refractory acute coronary artery occlusion during coronary angioplasty.

Authors:  P J de Feyter; I DeScheerder; M van den Brand; G Laarman; H Suryapranata; P W Serruys
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1990-11-01       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Pitfalls in the determination of absolute dimensions using angiographic catheters as calibration devices in quantitative angiography.

Authors:  D F Fortin; L A Spero; J T Cusma; L Santoro; R Burgess; T M Bashore
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1991-11-01       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Intraarterial biocompatibility of polyethylene terephthalate self-expandable stents implanted in porcine peripheral arteries.

Authors:  I K De Scheerder; K V Wilczek; E V Verbeken; L Barios; J Piessens; H De Geest
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.173

5.  Coronary angiogram interpretation. Interobserver variability.

Authors:  J E Galbraith; M L Murphy; N de Soyza
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1978-11-03       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  The importance of adequate anticoagulation to prevent early thrombosis after stenting of stenosed venous bypass grafts.

Authors:  J J Bucx; I de Scheerder; K Beatt; M van den Brand; H Suryapranata; P J de Feyter; P W Serruys
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 4.749

7.  Mechanical features and in vivo imaging of a polymer stent.

Authors:  W J van der Giessen; C J Slager; E J Gussenhoven; H M van Beusekom; R A Huijts; J C Schuurbiers; R A Wilson; P W Serruys; P D Verdouw
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1993-09

8.  Percutaneous polymeric stents in porcine coronary arteries. Initial experience with polyethylene terephthalate stents.

Authors:  J G Murphy; R S Schwartz; W D Edwards; A R Camrud; R E Vlietstra; D R Holmes
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Relative risk analysis of angiographic predictors of restenosis within the coronary Wallstent.

Authors:  B H Strauss; P W Serruys; I K de Scheerder; J G Tijssen; M E Bertrand; J Puel; B Meier; U Kaufmann; J C Stauffer; A F Rickards
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 29.690

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Biocompatibility of phosphorylcholine coated stents in normal porcine coronary arteries.

Authors:  D M Whelan; W J van der Giessen; S C Krabbendam; E A van Vliet; P D Verdouw; P W Serruys; H M van Beusekom
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Tissue compatibility of interfacial polyelectrolyte complexation fibrous scaffold: evaluation of blood compatibility and biocompatibility.

Authors:  Evelyn K F Yim; I-Chien Liao; Kam W Leong
Journal:  Tissue Eng       Date:  2007-02
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.