Literature DB >> 8657427

Electrical stimulation of precentral cortical area in the treatment of central pain: electrophysiological and PET study.

R Peyron1, L Garcia-Larrea, M P Deiber, L Cinotti, P Convers, M Sindou, F Mauguière, B Laurent.   

Abstract

The clinical, electrophysiological and haemodynamic effects of precentral gyrus stimulation (PGS) as a treatment of refractory post-stroke pain were studied in 2 patients. The first patient had a right hemibody pain secondary to a left parietal infarct sparing the thalamus, while the second patient had left lower limb pain developed after a right mesencephalic infarct. In both cases, spontaneous pain was associated with hyperpathia, allodynia and hypoaesthesia in the painful territory involving both lemniscal and extra-lemniscal sensory modalities in patient 1, extra-lemniscal sensory modality only in patient 2. Both patients were treated with electrical PGS by means of a 4-pole electrode, the central sulcus being per-operatively located using the phase-reversal of the N20 wave of somatosensory evoked potentials. No sensory side effect, abnormal movement or epileptic seizure were observed during PGS. The analgesic effects were somatotopically distributed according to the localization of electrode on motor cortex. A satisfactory long-lasting pain control (60-70% on visual analog scale) as well as attenuation of nociceptive reflexes were obtained during PGS in the first patient. Pain relief was less marked and only transient (2 months) in patient 2, in spite of a similar operative procedure. In this patient, in whom PGS eventually evoked painful dysethesiae, no attenuation of nociceptive RIII reflex could be evidenced during PGS. Cerebral blood flow (CBF) was studied using emission tomography (PET) with O-labeled water. The sites of CBF increase during PGS were the same in both patients, namely the thalamus ipsilateral to PGS, cingulate gyrus, orbito-frontal cortex and brainstem. CBF increase in brainstem structures was greater and lasted longer in patient 1 while patient 2 showed a greater CBF increase in orbito-frontal and cingular regions. Our results suggest that PGS-induced analgesia is somatotopically mediated and does not require the integrity of somatosensory cortex and lemniscal system. PGS analgesic efficacy may be mainly related to increased synaptic activity in the thalamus and brainstem while changes in cingulate gyrus and orbito-frontal cortex may be rather related to attentional and/or emotional processes. The inhibitory control on pain would involve thalamic and/or brainstem relays on descending pathways down to the spinal cord segments, leading to a depression of nociceptive reflexes. Painful dysesthesiae during stimulation have to be distinguished from other innocuous sensory side effects, since they may compromise PGS efficacy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8657427     DOI: 10.1016/0304-3959(94)00211-V

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  28 in total

Review 1.  Invasive brain stimulation for the treatment of neuropathic pain.

Authors:  Jean-Paul Nguyen; Julien Nizard; Yves Keravel; Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 42.937

Review 2.  Motor Cortex Stimulation for Deafferentation Pain.

Authors:  Ahmed E Hussein; Darian R Esfahani; Galina I Moisak; Jamil A Rzaev; Konstantin V Slavin
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2018-05-23

3.  From thalamic syndrome to central poststroke pain.

Authors:  G D Schott
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 10.154

4.  Effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation and visual illusion on neuropathic pain in spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Maria Dolors Soler; Hatice Kumru; Raul Pelayo; Joan Vidal; Josep Maria Tormos; Felipe Fregni; Xavier Navarro; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 13.501

5.  Comparison of functional MR imaging guidance to electrical cortical mapping for targeting selective motor cortex areas in neuropathic pain: a study based on intraoperative stereotactic navigation.

Authors:  Benoit Pirotte; Carine Neugroschl; Thierry Metens; David Wikler; Vincent Denolin; Philippe Voordecker; Alfred Joffroy; Nicolas Massager; Jacques Brotchi; Marc Levivier; Danielle Baleriaux
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 6.  Invasive and non-invasive brain stimulation for treatment of neuropathic pain in patients with spinal cord injury: a review.

Authors:  Raffaele Nardone; Yvonne Höller; Stefan Leis; Peter Höller; Natasha Thon; Aljoscha Thomschewski; Stefan Golaszewski; Francesco Brigo; Eugen Trinka
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 1.985

7.  Motor cortex stimulation suppresses cortical responses to noxious hindpaw stimulation after spinal cord lesion in rats.

Authors:  Li Jiang; Yadong Ji; Pamela J Voulalas; Michael Keaser; Su Xu; Rao P Gullapalli; Joel Greenspan; Radi Masri
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 8.955

8.  Fibromyalgia unique temporal brain activation during experimental pain: a controlled fMRI Study.

Authors:  Markus Burgmer; Esther Pogatzki-Zahn; Markus Gaubitz; Christoph Stüber; Erik Wessoleck; Gereon Heuft; Bettina Pfleiderer
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 3.575

9.  Motor cortex stimulation activates the incertothalamic pathway in an animal model of spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Myeounghoon Cha; Yadong Ji; Radi Masri
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 5.820

Review 10.  Motor cortex and deep brain stimulation for the treatment of intractable neuropathic face pain.

Authors:  Laneshia Thomas; Jonathan M Bledsoe; Matt Stead; Paola Sandroni; Deborah Gorman; Kendall H Lee
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.081

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.