Literature DB >> 24468093

Motor cortex stimulation suppresses cortical responses to noxious hindpaw stimulation after spinal cord lesion in rats.

Li Jiang1, Yadong Ji2, Pamela J Voulalas1, Michael Keaser3, Su Xu4, Rao P Gullapalli4, Joel Greenspan3, Radi Masri5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Motor cortex stimulation (MCS) is a potentially effective treatment for chronic neuropathic pain. The neural mechanisms underlying the reduction of hyperalgesia and allodynia after MCS are not completely understood.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the neural mechanisms responsible for analgesic effects after MCS. We test the hypothesis that MCS attenuates evoked blood oxygen-level dependent signals in cortical areas involved in nociceptive processing in an animal model of chronic neuropathic pain.
METHODS: We used adult female Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 10) that received unilateral electrolytic lesions of the right spinal cord at the level of C6 (SCL animals). In these animals, we performed magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) experiments to study the analgesic effects of MCS. On the day of fMRI experiment, 14 days after spinal cord lesion, the animals were anesthetized and epidural bipolar platinum electrodes were placed above the left primary motor cortex. Two 10-min sessions of fMRI were performed before and after a session of MCS (50 μA, 50 Hz, 300 μs, for 30 min). During each fMRI session, the right hindpaw was electrically stimulated (noxious stimulation: 5 mA, 5 Hz, 3 ms) using a block design of 20 s stimulation off and 20 s stimulation on. A general linear model-based statistical parametric analysis was used to analyze whole brain activation maps. Region of interest (ROI) analysis and paired t-test were used to compare changes in activation before and after MCS in these ROI.
RESULTS: MCS suppressed evoked blood oxygen dependent signals significantly (Family-wise error corrected P < 0.05) and bilaterally in 2 areas heavily implicated in nociceptive processing. These areas consisted of the primary somatosensory cortex and the prefrontal cortex.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that, in animals with SCL, MCS attenuates hypersensitivity by suppressing activity in the primary somatosensory cortex and prefrontal cortex.
Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Central pain; Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI); Motor cortex stimulation; Neuropathic pain; Noxious electrical stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24468093      PMCID: PMC4000711          DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2013.12.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Stimul        ISSN: 1876-4754            Impact factor:   8.955


  95 in total

1.  A fMRI study of brain activations during non-noxious and noxious electrical stimulation of the sciatic nerve of rats.

Authors:  C Chang; B C Shyu
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2001-04-06       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  Comparison of evoked cortical activity in conscious and propofol-anesthetized rats using functional MRI.

Authors:  K M Lahti; C F Ferris; F Li; C H Sotak; J A King
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Differences in the BOLD fMRI response to direct and indirect cortical stimulation in the rat.

Authors:  V C Austin; A M Blamire; S M Grieve; M J O'Neill; P Styles; P M Matthews; N R Sibson
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Conditioned place preference reveals tonic pain in an animal model of central pain.

Authors:  Leyla Davoody; Raimi L Quiton; Jessica M Lucas; Yadong Ji; Asaf Keller; Radi Masri
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2011-04-23       Impact factor: 5.820

5.  A unified statistical approach for determining significant signals in images of cerebral activation.

Authors:  K J Worsley; S Marrett; P Neelin; A C Vandal; K J Friston; A C Evans
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Stimulation of the rat somatosensory cortex at different frequencies and pulse widths.

Authors:  N Van Camp; M Verhoye; A Van der Linden
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.044

7.  Brainmapping of alpha-chloralose anesthetized rats with T2*-weighted imaging: distinction between the representation of the forepaw and hindpaw in the somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  C Bock; H Krep; G Brinker; M Hoehn-Berlage
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.044

8.  Electrical stimulation of motor cortex for pain control: a combined PET-scan and electrophysiological study.

Authors:  L García-Larrea; R Peyron; P Mertens; M C Gregoire; F Lavenne; D Le Bars; P Convers; F Mauguière; M Sindou; B Laurent
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 9.  Non-invasive stimulation therapies for the treatment of refractory pain.

Authors:  Julien Nizard; Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur; Marion Helbert; Edwige de Chauvigny; Jean-Paul Nguyen
Journal:  Discov Med       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.970

10.  Zona incerta: a role in central pain.

Authors:  Radi Masri; Raimi L Quiton; Jessica M Lucas; Peter D Murray; Scott M Thompson; Asaf Keller
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Motor Cortex Stimulation for Deafferentation Pain.

Authors:  Ahmed E Hussein; Darian R Esfahani; Galina I Moisak; Jamil A Rzaev; Konstantin V Slavin
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2018-05-23

2.  Post-translational modification of cortical GluA receptors in rodents following spinal cord lesion.

Authors:  L Jiang; P Voulalas; Y Ji; R Masri
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 3.  Cortical reorganization after spinal cord injury: always for good?

Authors:  K A Moxon; A Oliviero; J Aguilar; G Foffani
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 3.590

4.  Loss of dopamine D1 receptors and diminished D1/5 receptor-mediated ERK phosphorylation in the periaqueductal gray after spinal cord lesion.

Authors:  Pamela J Voulalas; Yadong Ji; Li Jiang; Jamila Asgar; Jin Y Ro; Radi Masri
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 3.590

5.  New Developments in Non-invasive Brain Stimulation in Chronic Pain.

Authors:  Timothy J Meeker; Rithvic Jupudi; Frederik A Lenz; Joel D Greenspan
Journal:  Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep       Date:  2020-05-11

6.  Cortical Regulation of Nociception of the Trigeminal Nucleus Caudalis.

Authors:  Alberto Castro; Charles Raver; Ying Li; Olivia Uddin; David Rubin; Yadong Ji; Radi Masri; Asaf Keller
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 6.709

7.  Gabapentin reverses central hypersensitivity and suppresses medial prefrontal cortical glucose metabolism in rats with neuropathic pain.

Authors:  Hsiao-Chun Lin; Yu-Hsin Huang; Tzu-Hao Harry Chao; Wen-Ying Lin; Wei-Zen Sun; Chen-Tung Yen
Journal:  Mol Pain       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 3.395

8.  Repetitive motor cortex stimulation reinforces the pain modulation circuits of peripheral neuropathic pain.

Authors:  Myeounghoon Cha; Sun Woo Um; Minjee Kwon; Taick Sang Nam; Bae Hwan Lee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Invasive Motor Cortex Stimulation Influences Intracerebral Structures in Patients With Neuropathic Pain: An Activation Likelihood Estimation Meta-Analysis of Imaging Data.

Authors:  Ruben Volkers; Esmay Giesen; Maudy van der Heiden; Mijke Kerperien; Sibylle Lange; Erkan Kurt; Robert van Dongen; Dennis Schutter; Kris C P Vissers; Dylan Henssen
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2020-02-06

10.  Brain Stimulation Therapy for Central Post-Stroke Pain from a Perspective of Interhemispheric Neural Network Remodeling.

Authors:  Takashi Morishita; Tooru Inoue
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.