Literature DB >> 8656346

Two year clinical study of a soft acrylic intraocular lens.

T Oshika1, Y Suzuki, H Kizaki, S Yaguchi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy and safety of a soft acrylic intraocular lens (IOL) in small incision cataract surgery.
METHODS: Sixty-four eyes of 64 patients (mean age 71.0 +/- 7.7 [SD] years) who had phacoemulsification and implantation of a soft acrylic IOL were followed for 2 years.
RESULTS: At day 1, 96.9% of patients had corrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better, and 50.0% had 20/20 or better. At 2 years postoperatively, 100% had 20/40 or better, and 86.3% had 20/20. Surgically induced keratometric cylinder remained quite stable throughout the 2 year follow-up period, with axis-based astigmatism of +/- 0.3 diopters. Flare intensity measured with the laser flare-cell meter was less than that with other type of IOLs measured, including poly(methyl methacrylate) and silicone. Neodymium:YAG laser capsulotomy was performed in seven cases (11.1%). without causing damage to the optic. No other postoperative complications were encountered.
CONCLUSION: Soft acrylic IOLs have clinically apparent advantages in small incision cataract surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8656346     DOI: 10.1016/s0886-3350(96)80278-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  9 in total

1.  Influence of glistenings on the optical quality of acrylic foldable intraocular lens.

Authors:  T Oshika; Y Shiokawa; S Amano; K Mitomo
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Capsular contraction syndrome following insertion of hydrophilic acrylic lens.

Authors:  Archana Malik; Neeti Gupta; Sunandan Sood
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-01-29       Impact factor: 2.031

3.  Evaluation of Posterior Capsular Opacification following Phacoemulsification, Extracapsular and Small Incision Cataract Surgery.

Authors:  P S Moulick; Fea Rodrigues; K Shyamsundar
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-07-21

4.  Evaluation of a human capsular bag model for secondary cataract determination after intraocular lens implantation.

Authors:  A Liekfeld; N Pahms; N Torun; A U Porstmann; J Jaroszewski; C Hartmann
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-09-10       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Adhesion of lens capsule to intraocular lenses of polymethylmethacrylate, silicone, and acrylic foldable materials: an experimental study.

Authors:  T Oshika; T Nagata; Y Ishii
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  A prospective, randomised comparison of single and three piece acrylic foldable intraocular lenses.

Authors:  R Nejima; K Miyata; M Honbou; T Tokunaga; T Tanabe; M Sato; T Oshika
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  Results and complications of hydrophobic acrylic vs PMMA posterior chamber lenses in children under 17 years of age.

Authors:  Michael Küchle; Berthold Lausen; Gabriele-Charlotte Gusek-Schneider
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-07-17       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Hydrophobic acrylic versus heparin surface-modified polymethylmethacrylate intraocular lens: a biocompatibility study.

Authors:  Daniele Tognetto; Lisa Toto; Daniela Minutola; Enzo Ballone; Marta Di Nicola; Rocco Di Mascio; Giuseppe Ravalico
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-07-17       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  Lens epithelial cell regression on the posterior capsule with different intraocular lens materials.

Authors:  E J Hollick; D J Spalton; P G Ursell; M V Pande
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.638

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.