A M Coulston1, L Craig, A C Voss. 1. General Clinical Research Center at Stanford University Medical Center, Calif 94305, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To identify older adults with poor nutritional status among the independent-living elderly applying for meals-on-wheels, and to compare how a self-assessment tool and more traditional criteria identify nutritional risk. DESIGN: Descriptive study. SUBJECTS/ SETTING: Meals-on-wheels applicants (n = 230 between 60 and 90 years of age (mean age = 77.4 +/- 7 years) who were free from terminal illness. Nutrition assessment data were collected in the home of each participant. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Risk assessment for poor nutritional status was determined using anthropometric, dietary, and laboratory data and with a Nutrition Screening Initiative (NSI) self-assessment tool-the "DETERMINE Your Nutritional Health" checklist. STATISTICAL ANALYSES: Differences were assessed using Student's t test for unpaired data. RESULTS: Seventy-four percent of study participants were found to be at risk for poor nutritional status according to the study criteria, and 98% were at risk for poor nutritional status according to the NSI self-assessment tool. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of the applicants for meals-on-wheels were at risk for poor nutritional status. Thus, many independent-living older adults may need additional nutrition assessment and intervention to remain independent and in good nutritional status.
OBJECTIVE: To identify older adults with poor nutritional status among the independent-living elderly applying for meals-on-wheels, and to compare how a self-assessment tool and more traditional criteria identify nutritional risk. DESIGN: Descriptive study. SUBJECTS/ SETTING: Meals-on-wheels applicants (n = 230 between 60 and 90 years of age (mean age = 77.4 +/- 7 years) who were free from terminal illness. Nutrition assessment data were collected in the home of each participant. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Risk assessment for poor nutritional status was determined using anthropometric, dietary, and laboratory data and with a Nutrition Screening Initiative (NSI) self-assessment tool-the "DETERMINE Your Nutritional Health" checklist. STATISTICAL ANALYSES: Differences were assessed using Student's t test for unpaired data. RESULTS: Seventy-four percent of study participants were found to be at risk for poor nutritional status according to the study criteria, and 98% were at risk for poor nutritional status according to the NSI self-assessment tool. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of the applicants for meals-on-wheels were at risk for poor nutritional status. Thus, many independent-living older adults may need additional nutrition assessment and intervention to remain independent and in good nutritional status.
Authors: Julie L Locher; Christine S Ritchie; David L Roth; Patricia Sawyer Baker; Eric V Bodner; Richard M Allman Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: K E Charlton; K Walton; L Moon; K Smith; A T McMahon; F Ralph; M Stuckey; F Manning; J Krassie Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Emam M M Esmayel; Mohsen M Eldarawy; Mohamed M M Hassan; Hassan Mahmoud Hassanin; Walid M Reda Ashour; Wael Mahmoud Journal: J Aging Res Date: 2013-10-10