Literature DB >> 23538660

"It could probably help someone else but not me": a feasibility study of a snack programme offered to meals on wheels clients.

K E Charlton1, K Walton, L Moon, K Smith, A T McMahon, F Ralph, M Stuckey, F Manning, J Krassie.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Community-based services, such as Meals on Wheels (MOW), allow older adults to remain in their homes for as long as possible. Many MOW recipients experience decreased appetite that limits intake at mealtimes. This pilot study aimed to determine the feasibility of providing high protein high energy snacks to improve nutrient intakes of MOW clients in a regional centre of New South Wales, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: A convenience sample of 12 MOW clients. INTERVENTION: Participants received snacks five times a week, in addition to their usual MOW order, for four weeks. MEASUREMENTS: Nutritional status was assessed using the Mini Nutritional Assessment tool. Pre-post changes in dietary intake were assessed using a diet history and food frequency questionnaire. Qualitative interviews conducted in clients' homes were digitally recorded, transcribed verbatim, and themes identified.
RESULTS: Post-intervention, there was a trend for an increased energy (mean = +415kJ (SD=1477) /day) and protein (+7.2 (±14.06) g/day) intake. MNA scores significantly increased (P= 0.036) and proportion of respondents categorised as 'malnourished' or 'at risk of malnutrition' decreased from 17% to 8%, and 67% to 25%, respectively (P <0.05). Mean body weight increased from 67.1 (±14.3) to 67.8 (±14.8) (P= 0.008), while Body Mass Index (BMI) increased by a mean of 0.78 (±1.16) kg/m2 (P = 0.039). Only half of participants indicated interest in continuing with the program. Reasons included the role of snacks serving as a reminder to eat, as well as their perceived nutritional value. Identified barriers included perceived lack of need for additional food, ability to self-provide such items, and a perceived adequate health status.
CONCLUSION: Provision of an additional daily mid-meal snack may be a useful addition to existing MOW services, for improved energy and protein intakes. However, not all MOW clients at risk of malnutrition perceived the snacks to be beneficial to them.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23538660     DOI: 10.1007/s12603-013-0035-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging        ISSN: 1279-7707            Impact factor:   4.075


  22 in total

1.  Body mass index, weight loss and energy intake of old Danish nursing home residents and home-care clients.

Authors:  Anne Marie Beck; Lars Ovesen
Journal:  Scand J Caring Sci       Date:  2002-03

Review 2.  Nutrition in the age-related disablement process.

Authors:  M Inzitari; E Doets; B Bartali; V Benetou; M Di Bari; M Visser; S Volpato; G Gambassi; E Topinkova; L De Groot; A Salva
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.075

3.  Meals-on-wheels applicants are a population at risk for poor nutritional status.

Authors:  A M Coulston; L Craig; A C Voss
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  1996-06

4.  Nutritional status of Irish older people in receipt of meals-on-wheels and the nutritional content of meals provided.

Authors:  C O'Dwyer; C A Corish; V Timonen
Journal:  J Hum Nutr Diet       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.089

5.  Home food environment of older adults transitioning from hospital to home.

Authors:  Ucheoma O Anyanwu; Joseph R Sharkey; Robert T Jackson; Nadine R Sahyoun
Journal:  J Nutr Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2011

Review 6.  Assessing the nutritional status of the elderly: The Mini Nutritional Assessment as part of the geriatric evaluation.

Authors:  Y Guigoz; B Vellas; P J Garry
Journal:  Nutr Rev       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 7.110

7.  Poor nutritional status of older subacute patients predicts clinical outcomes and mortality at 18 months of follow-up.

Authors:  K Charlton; C Nichols; S Bowden; M Milosavljevic; K Lambert; L Barone; M Mason; M Batterham
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 8.  Hospital malnutrition: prevalence, identification and impact on patients and the healthcare system.

Authors:  Lisa A Barker; Belinda S Gout; Timothy C Crowe
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Managing undernutrition in the elderly - prevention is better than cure.

Authors:  Damian Flanagan; Therese Fisher; Michael Murray; Renuka Visvanathan; Karen Charlton; Cathy Thesing; Gerald Quigley; Kerstin Walther
Journal:  Aust Fam Physician       Date:  2012-09

Review 10.  Protein and energy supplementation in elderly people at risk from malnutrition.

Authors:  Anne C Milne; Jan Potter; Angela Vivanti; Alison Avenell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-04-15
View more
  4 in total

1.  The MNA in 2013 - still going stronger after almost twenty years.

Authors:  J M Bauer
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.075

Review 2.  Does Participation in Home-Delivered Meals Programs Improve Outcomes for Older Adults? Results of a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Anthony D Campbell; Alice Godfryd; David R Buys; Julie L Locher
Journal:  J Nutr Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2015

Review 3.  Barriers and facilitators to screening and treating malnutrition in older adults living in the community: a mixed-methods synthesis.

Authors:  Philine S Harris; Liz Payne; Leanne Morrison; Sue M Green; Daniela Ghio; Claire Hallett; Emma L Parsons; Paul Aveyard; Helen C Roberts; Michelle Sutcliffe; Siân Robinson; Joanna Slodkowska-Barabasz; Paul S Little; Michael A Stroud; Lucy Yardley
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 2.497

4.  Home-Delivered Meals: Characterization of Food Intake in Elderly Beneficiaries.

Authors:  Ségolène Fleury; Virginie Van Wymelbeke-Delannoy; Bruno Lesourd; Paul Tronchon; Isabelle Maître; Claire Sulmont-Rossé
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 5.717

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.