Literature DB >> 8655586

Metazoan rDNA enhancer acts by making more genes transcriptionally active.

Y N Osheim1, E B Mougey, J Windle, M Anderson, M O'Reilly, O L Miller, A Beyer, B Sollner-Webb.   

Abstract

Enhancers could, in principle, function by increasing the rate of reinitiation on individual adjacent active promoters or by increasing the probability that an adjacent promoter is activated for transcription. We have addressed this issue for the repetitive metazoan rDNA enhancer by microinjecting Xenopus oocytes with enhancer-less and enhancer-bearing genes and determining by EM the frequency that each gene type forms active transcription units and their transcript density. We use conditions where transcription requires the normal rDNA promoter and is stimulated 30-50-fold by the enhancer. (In contrast, at saturating template conditions as used in previous EM studies, an aberrant mode of transcription is activated that is not affected by the rDNA enhancer or by the generally recognized rDNA promoter). The active transcription units on enhancer-less genes are found to be as densely packed with nascent transcripts and polymerases as those on enhancer-bearing genes and on the endogenous rRNA genes. Significantly, the enhancer-bearing genes are approximately 30-50-fold more likely to form such active transcription units than enhancer-less genes, consistent with their amounts of transcript. Complementary studies confirm that the enhancer does not affect elongation rate, the stability of the transcription complex, or transcript half-life. These data demonstrate that the repetitive metazoan rDNA enhancer causes more genes to be actively transcribed and does not alter the reinitiation rate on individual active genes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8655586      PMCID: PMC2120851          DOI: 10.1083/jcb.133.5.943

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cell Biol        ISSN: 0021-9525            Impact factor:   10.539


  56 in total

1.  Modulation of ribosomal RNA synthesis in Oncopeltus fasciatus: an electron microscopic study of the relationship between changes in chromatin structure and transcriptional activity.

Authors:  V E Foe
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  1978

2.  Transcription of cloned Xenopus ribosomal genes visualised after injection into oocyte nuclei.

Authors:  M F Trendelenburg; J B Gurdon
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1978-11-16       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Stimulation of the mouse rRNA gene promoter by a distal spacer promoter.

Authors:  M H Paalman; S L Henderson; B Sollner-Webb
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  Enhancers increase the probability but not the level of gene expression.

Authors:  M C Walters; S Fiering; J Eidemiller; W Magis; M Groudine; D I Martin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-07-18       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Recycling of the general transcription factors during RNA polymerase II transcription.

Authors:  L Zawel; K P Kumar; D Reinberg
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1995-06-15       Impact factor: 11.361

6.  RNA polymerase II C-terminal domain required for enhancer-driven transcription.

Authors:  H P Gerber; M Hagmann; K Seipel; O Georgiev; M A West; Y Litingtung; W Schaffner; J L Corden
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1995-04-13       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Morphology of transcription units in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  C D Laird; W Y Chooi
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1976-10-28       Impact factor: 4.316

8.  Comparative organization of active transcription units in Oncopeltus fasciatus.

Authors:  V E Foe; L E Wilkinson; C D Laird
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  The RNA polymerase I transcription factor UBF is a sequence-tolerant HMG-box protein that can recognize structured nucleic acids.

Authors:  G P Copenhaver; C D Putnam; M L Denton; C S Pikaard
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1994-07-11       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Real-time analysis of the transcriptional regulation of HIV and hCMV promoters in single mammalian cells.

Authors:  M R White; M Masuko; L Amet; G Elliott; M Braddock; A J Kingsman; S M Kingsman
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 5.285

View more
  14 in total

1.  Variegated expression of the endogenous immunoglobulin heavy-chain gene in the absence of the intronic locus control region.

Authors:  D Ronai; M Berru; M J Shulman
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 2.  Survey and summary: transcription by RNA polymerases I and III.

Authors:  M R Paule; R J White
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-03-15       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Positive feedback in eukaryotic gene networks: cell differentiation by graded to binary response conversion.

Authors:  A Becskei; B Séraphin; L Serrano
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 11.598

4.  The interferon-inducible nucleolar p204 protein binds the ribosomal RNA-specific UBF1 transcription factor and inhibits ribosomal RNA transcription.

Authors:  C J Liu; H Wang; P Lengyel
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1999-05-17       Impact factor: 11.598

5.  Dimerization and HMG box domains 1-3 present in Xenopus UBF are sufficient for its role in transcriptional enhancement.

Authors:  G J Sullivan; B McStay
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1998-08-01       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Transcription reinitiation rate: a special role for the TATA box.

Authors:  D Yean; J Gralla
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 7.  Chromatin domains and nuclear compartments: establishing sites of gene expression in eukaryotic nuclei.

Authors:  D A Jackson
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 2.316

8.  In exponentially growing Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells, rRNA synthesis is determined by the summed RNA polymerase I loading rate rather than by the number of active genes.

Authors:  Sarah L French; Yvonne N Osheim; Francesco Cioci; Masayasu Nomura; Ann L Beyer
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.272

9.  RPD3 is required for the inactivation of yeast ribosomal DNA genes in stationary phase.

Authors:  Joseph J Sandmeier; Sarah French; Yvonne Osheim; Wang L Cheung; Christopher M Gallo; Ann L Beyer; Jeffrey S Smith
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2002-09-16       Impact factor: 11.598

10.  Tor pathway regulates Rrn3p-dependent recruitment of yeast RNA polymerase I to the promoter but does not participate in alteration of the number of active genes.

Authors:  Jonathan A Claypool; Sarah L French; Katsuki Johzuka; Kristilyn Eliason; Loan Vu; Jonathan A Dodd; Ann L Beyer; Masayasu Nomura
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2003-10-31       Impact factor: 4.138

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.