Literature DB >> 8652117

Continuous ethanol production by Zymomonas mobilis and Saccharomyces cerevisiae in biofilm reactors.

M R Kunduru1, A L Pometto.   

Abstract

Continuous ethanol fermentations were performed in duplicate for 60 days with Zymomonas mobilis ATCC 331821 or Saccharomyces cerevisiae ATCC 24859 in packed-bed reactors with polypropylene or plastic composite-supports. The plastic composite-supports used contained polypropylene (75%) with ground soybean-hulls (20%) and zein (5%) for Z. mobilis, or with ground soybean-hulls (20%) and soybean flour (5%) for S. cerevisiae. Maximum ethanol productivities of 536 g L-1 h-1 (39% yield) and 499 g L-1 h-1 (37% yield) were obtained with Z. mobilis on polypropylene and plastic composite-supports of soybean hull-zein, respectively. For Z. mobilis, an optimal yield of 50% was observed at a 1.92 h-1 dilution rate for soybean hull-zein plastic composite-supports with a productivity of 96 g L-1 h-1, whereas with polypropylene-supports the yield was 32% and the productivity was 60 g L-1 h-1. With a S. cerevisiae fermentation, the ethanol production was less, with a maximum productivity of 76 g L-1 h-1 on the plastic composite-support at a 2.88 h-1 dilution rate with a 45% yield. Polypropylene-support bioreactors were discontinued due to reactor plugging by the cell mass accumulation. Support shape (3-mm chips) was responsible for bioreactor plugging due to extensive biofilm development on the plastic composite-supports. With suspension-culture continuous fermentations in continuously-stirred benchtop fermentors, maximum productivities of 5 g L-1 h-1 were obtained with a yield of 24 and 26% with S. cerevisiae and Z. mobilis, respectively. Cell washout in suspension-culture continuous fermentations was observed at a 1.0 h-1 dilution rate. Therefore, for continuous ethanol fermentations, biofilm reactors out-performed suspension-culture reactors, with 15 to 100-fold higher productivities (g L-1 h-1) and with higher percentage yields for S. cerevisiae and Z. mobilis, respectively. Further research is needed with these novel supports to evaluate different support shapes and medium compositions that will permit medium flow, stimulate biofilm formation, reduce fermentation costs, and produce maximum yields and productivities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8652117     DOI: 10.1007/BF01570029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ind Microbiol        ISSN: 0169-4146


  5 in total

1.  Continuous ethanol production by Zymomonas mobilis and Saccharomyces cerevisiae in biofilm reactors.

Authors:  M R Kunduru; A L Pometto
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol       Date:  1996-04

2.  Lactic Acid production in a mixed-culture biofilm reactor.

Authors:  A Demirci; A L Pometto; K E Johnson
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Feed component inhibition in ethanolic fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  B L Maiorella; H W Blanch; C R Wilke
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Continuous production of ethanol from fructose by immobilized growing cells of Zymomonas mobilis.

Authors:  W K Jain; I Toran-Diaz; J Baratti
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Ethanol fermentation in a continuous tower fermentor.

Authors:  S T Jones; R A Korus; W Admassu; R C Heimsch
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 4.530

  5 in total
  9 in total

1.  Continuous ethanol production by Zymomonas mobilis and Saccharomyces cerevisiae in biofilm reactors.

Authors:  M R Kunduru; A L Pometto
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol       Date:  1996-04

2.  Enhanced benzaldehyde tolerance in Zymomonas mobilis biofilms and the potential of biofilm applications in fine-chemical production.

Authors:  Xuan Zhong Li; Jeremy S Webb; Staffan Kjelleberg; Bettina Rosche
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Biofilm reactors for industrial bioconversion processes: employing potential of enhanced reaction rates.

Authors:  Nasib Qureshi; Bassam A Annous; Thaddeus C Ezeji; Patrick Karcher; Ian S Maddox
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2005-08-25       Impact factor: 5.328

Review 4.  Living together in biofilms: the microbial cell factory and its biotechnological implications.

Authors:  Mercedes Berlanga; Ricardo Guerrero
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 5.328

5.  Hyperadherence of Pseudomonas taiwanensis VLB120ΔC increases productivity of (S)-styrene oxide formation.

Authors:  Karolin Schmutzler; Katharina Kupitz; Andreas Schmid; Katja Buehler
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 5.813

6.  Zymomonas mobilis Biofilm Reactor for Ethanol Production Using Rice Straw Hydrolysate Under Continuous and Repeated Batch Processes.

Authors:  Tatsaporn Todhanakasem; O-Lan Salangsing; Piyawit Koomphongse; Sanya Kaewket; Pattanop Kanokratana; Verawat Champreda
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 7.  Advances on Bacterial and Fungal Biofilms for the Production of Added-Value Compounds.

Authors:  Fábio M Carvalho; Ana Azevedo; Marta M Ferreira; Filipe J M Mergulhão; Luciana C Gomes
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-27

8.  Enhanced production of bacterial cellulose by using a biofilm reactor and its material property analysis.

Authors:  Kuan-Chen Cheng; Jeff M Catchmark; Ali Demirci
Journal:  J Biol Eng       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 4.355

9.  Optimisation of engineered Escherichia coli biofilms for enzymatic biosynthesis of l-halotryptophans.

Authors:  Stefano Perni; Louise Hackett; Rebecca Jm Goss; Mark J Simmons; Tim W Overton
Journal:  AMB Express       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 3.298

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.