Literature DB >> 18551633

Feed component inhibition in ethanolic fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

B L Maiorella1, H W Blanch, C R Wilke.   

Abstract

Inhibition by secondary feed components can limit productivity and restrict process options for the production of ethanol by fermentation. New fermentation processes (such as vacuum or extractive fermentation), while selectively removing ethanol, can concentrate nonmetabolized feed components in the remaining broth. Stillage recycle to reduce stillage waste treatment results in the buildup of nonmetabolized feed components. Continuous culture experiments are presented establishing an inhibition order: CaCl(2), (NH(4))(2)xSO(4) > NaCl, NH(4)Cl > KH(2)PO(4) > xylose, MgCl(2) > MgSO(4) > KCl. Reduction of the water activity alone is not an adequate predictor of the variation in inhibitory concentration among the different components tested. As a general trend, specific ethanol productivity increases and cell production decreases as inhibitors are added at higher concentration. We postulate that these results can be interpreted in terms of an increase in energy requirements for cell maintenance under hypertonic (stressed) conditions. Ion and carbohydrate transport and specific toxic effects are reviewed as they relate to the postulated inhibition mechanism. Glycerol production increases under hypertonic conditions and glycerol is postulated to function as a nontoxic osmoregulator. Calcium was the most inhibitory component tested, causing an 80%decline in cell mass production at 0.23 mol Ca(2+)/L and calcium is present at substantial concentration in many carbohydrate sources. For a typical final cane molasses feed, stillage recycle must be limited to less than onethird of the feed rate; otherwise inhibitory effects will be observed.

Entities:  

Year:  1984        PMID: 18551633     DOI: 10.1002/bit.260261004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng        ISSN: 0006-3592            Impact factor:   4.530


  10 in total

1.  Continuous ethanol production by Zymomonas mobilis and Saccharomyces cerevisiae in biofilm reactors.

Authors:  M R Kunduru; A L Pometto
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol       Date:  1996-04

Review 2.  Toxicological challenges to microbial bioethanol production and strategies for improved tolerance.

Authors:  Hannah Akinosho; Thomas Rydzak; Abhijeet Borole; Arthur Ragauskas; Dan Close
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 2.823

Review 3.  Physiology of yeasts in relation to biomass yields.

Authors:  C Verduyn
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  1991 Oct-Nov       Impact factor: 2.271

4.  Inhibition of growth of Zymomonas mobilis by model compounds found in lignocellulosic hydrolysates.

Authors:  Mary Ann Franden; Heidi M Pilath; Ali Mohagheghi; Philip T Pienkos; Min Zhang
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 6.040

5.  Identification and Characterization of a Novel Issatchenkia orientalis GPI-Anchored Protein, IoGas1, Required for Resistance to Low pH and Salt Stress.

Authors:  Akinori Matsushika; Kanako Negi; Toshihiro Suzuki; Tetsuya Goshima; Tamotsu Hoshino
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Engineering tolerance to industrially relevant stress factors in yeast cell factories.

Authors:  Quinten Deparis; Arne Claes; Maria R Foulquié-Moreno; Johan M Thevelein
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 2.796

7.  Bioconversion of lignocellulose: inhibitors and detoxification.

Authors:  Leif J Jönsson; Björn Alriksson; Nils-Olof Nilvebrant
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 6.040

8.  Effect of salts on the Co-fermentation of glucose and xylose by a genetically engineered strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Elizabeth Casey; Nathan S Mosier; Jiri Adamec; Zachary Stockdale; Nancy Ho; Miroslav Sedlak
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 6.040

9.  Response Surface Optimization of Bioethanol Production from Sugarcane Molasses by Pichia veronae Strain HSC-22.

Authors:  Hamed I Hamouda; Hussein N Nassar; Hekmat R Madian; Salem S Abu Amr; Nour Sh El-Gendy
Journal:  Biotechnol Res Int       Date:  2015-12-08

10.  Generation of PHB from Spent Sulfite Liquor Using Halophilic Microorganisms.

Authors:  Michaela Weissgram; Janina Gstöttner; Bettina Lorantfy; Raimund Tenhaken; Christoph Herwig; Hedda K Weber
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2015-06-08
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.