Literature DB >> 10579601

Multicenter patient records research: security policies and tools.

F M Behlen1, S B Johnson.   

Abstract

The expanding health information infrastructure offers the promise of new medical knowledge drawn from patient records. Such promise will never be fulfilled, however, unless researchers first address policy issues regarding the rights and interests of both the patients and the institutions who hold their records. In this article, the authors analyze the interests of patients and institutions in light of public policy and institutional needs. They conclude that the multicenter study, with Institutional Review Board approval of each study at each site, protects the interests of both. "Anonymity" is no panacea, since patient records are so rich in information that they can never be truly anonymous. Researchers must earn and respect the trust of the public, as responsible stewards of facts about patients' lives. The authors find that computer security tools are needed to administer multicenter patient records studies and describe simple approaches that can be implemented using commercial database products.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10579601      PMCID: PMC61386          DOI: 10.1136/jamia.1999.0060435

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  14 in total

1.  Security architecture for multi-site patient records research.

Authors:  F M Behlen; S B Johnson
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  1999

2.  Health information privacy.

Authors:  Lawrence O Gostin
Journal:  Cornell Law Rev       Date:  1995-03

3.  The public health information infrastructure. A national review of the law on health information privacy.

Authors:  L O Gostin; Z Lazzarini; V S Neslund; M T Osterholm
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-06-26       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Database standardization, linkage, and the protection of privacy.

Authors:  E N Lazaridis
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1997-10-15       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  The threat to medical-records research.

Authors:  L J Melton
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-11-13       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 6.  Health care information and the protection of personal privacy: ethical and legal considerations.

Authors:  L Gostin
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1997-10-15       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Replacing personally-identifying information in medical records, the Scrub system.

Authors:  L Sweeney
Journal:  Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp       Date:  1996

8.  A security mediator for health care information.

Authors:  G Wiederhold; M Bilello; V Sarathy; X Qian
Journal:  Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp       Date:  1996

9.  Privacy and security of personal information in a new health care system.

Authors:  L O Gostin; J Turek-Brezina; M Powers; R Kozloff; R Faden; D D Steinauer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-11-24       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Guaranteeing anonymity when sharing medical data, the Datafly System.

Authors:  L Sweeney
Journal:  Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp       Date:  1997
View more
  4 in total

1.  A proposed key escrow system for secure patient information disclosure in biomedical research databases.

Authors:  Todd A Ferris; Gregory M Garrison; Henry J Lowe
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2002

2.  Database design to ensure anonymous study of medical errors: a report from the ASIPS Collaborative.

Authors:  Wilson D Pace; Elizabeth W Staton; Gregory S Higgins; Deborah S Main; David R West; Daniel M Harris
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2003-08-04       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Security and access of health research data.

Authors:  Willy Susilo; Khin Than Win
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.460

4.  Security requirements for a lifelong electronic health record system: an opinion.

Authors:  J Wainer; C J R Campos; M D U Salinas; D Sigulem
Journal:  Open Med Inform J       Date:  2008-12-24
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.