Literature DB >> 864399

Semantic and perceptual processes in symbolic comparisons.

W P Banks, J Flora.   

Abstract

This article studies the processing of pictures and words as symbols. Pictures lead to faster and more accurate responses than words when the task is to decide which member of a pair of pictures or words denotes the larger or smaller object. The present experiments show that the superiority of pictures results from the fact that pictures are interpreted more quickly than words, but that after the interpretation is made, processing is the same. These experiments also give evidence that pictures and words are both processed in terms of linguistic codes rather than mental images. The results are well accounted for by an information-processing model that is based on two general assumptions: (a) The stimuli and the instructions are represented as discrete codes, and (b) processing proceeds until one and only one of the stimulus codes is the same as the code for the instructions.

Mesh:

Year:  1977        PMID: 864399     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.3.2.278

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  33 in total

1.  The locus and nature of semantic congruity in symbolic comparison: evidence from the Stroop effect.

Authors:  Samuel Shaki; Daniel Algom
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-01

2.  Stimulus generalization along a dimension based on a verbal concept.

Authors:  R W Howard
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Effects of instruction presentation mode in comparative judgments.

Authors:  Samuel Shaki; Craig Leth-Steensen; William M Petrusic
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-01

4.  Semantic processing of Arabic, Kanji, and Kana numbers: evidence from interference in physical and numerical size judgments.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Ito; Takeshi Hatta
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-04

5.  Symbolic comparisons with and without perceptual referents: is interval information used?

Authors:  J M Henderson; A D Well
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1985-03

6.  Semantic congruity and lexical marking in symbolic comparisons: an expectancy hypothesis.

Authors:  M Marschark; A Paivio
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1979-05

7.  Why is short-term sentence recall verbatim? An evaluation of the role of lexical priming.

Authors:  M W Lee; J N Williams
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1997-03

8.  Cognitive tools shape thought: diagrams in design.

Authors:  Jeffrey V Nickerson; James E Corter; Barbara Tversky; Yun-Jin Rho; Doris Zahner; Lixiu Yu
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2013-02-15

9.  Semantic congruity effects in perceptual comparisons.

Authors:  W M Petrusic; J V Baranski
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1989-05

10.  Embodied language comprehension: encoding-based and goal-driven processes.

Authors:  Renske S Hoedemaker; Peter C Gordon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2013-03-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.