Literature DB >> 2726407

Semantic congruity effects in perceptual comparisons.

W M Petrusic, J V Baranski.   

Abstract

Semantic congruity effects occur when, as in Experiment 1, for example, the time to select the shorter of two relatively short lines is faster than the time to select the longer; conversely, selection of the longer of two relatively long lines is faster than selection of the shorter. Semantic congruity effects are also demonstrated in experiments requiring comparisons of the heaviness of weights (Experiment 2) and horizontal extent (Experiment 3). In Experiment 1, the magnitude of the semantic congruity effect was larger under conditions emphasizing accuracy rather than speed and when the comparison was difficult. In fact, when comparisons were errorless, the effect was minimal (20 msec), thereby replicating previous failures to obtain the effect with supraliminal perceptual comparisons (Banks, Mermelstein, & Yu, 1982; Marschark & Paivio, 1981; Petrusic & Baranski, 1988a). In confirmation of Henmon's (1911) introspective analyses of psychophysical comparisons, Experiments 2 and 3 extend the range of the semantic congruity effect to include judgments of confidence. However, in each of the three experiments, semantic congruity effects were not evident with the response-accuracy measure. Finally, using highly confusable stimuli, in Experiment 3 the magnitude of the semantic congruity effect was shown to be larger for error than for correct response times. The implications of these findings for a decisional locus of the effect and for the semantic coding theory are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2726407     DOI: 10.3758/bf03210718

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  15 in total

1.  RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LATENCY AND REMOTENESS IN PREFERENCE JUDGMENTS.

Authors:  M G GREENBERG; D G DOREN
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1965-08

2.  A stochastic model for individual choice behavior.

Authors:  R J AUDLEY
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1960-01       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Psychological scaling without a unit of measurement.

Authors:  C H COOMBS
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1950-05       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Semantic congruity and lexical marking in symbolic comparisons: an expectancy hypothesis.

Authors:  M Marschark; A Paivio
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1979-05

5.  The role of succession in temporal cognition: is the time-order error a recency effect of memory?

Authors:  F R Schab; R G Crowder
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1988-09

6.  Discriminations among perceptual and symbolic stimuli.

Authors:  W P Banks; R Mermelstein; H K Yu
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1982-05

7.  Semantic congruity and expectancy in symbolic judgments.

Authors:  W P Banks; H White; W Sturgill; R Mermelstein
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Effects of alternating set for speed or accuracy on response time, accuracy and confidence in a unidimensional discrimination task.

Authors:  D Vickers; J Packer
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1982-03

9.  Congruity and the perceptual comparison task.

Authors:  M Marschark; A Paivio
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  A positional discriminability model of linear-order judgments.

Authors:  K J Holyoak; K K Patterson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  8 in total

1.  The locus and nature of semantic congruity in symbolic comparison: evidence from the Stroop effect.

Authors:  Samuel Shaki; Daniel Algom
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-01

2.  The discriminability of remembered magnitudes.

Authors:  J V Baranski; W M Petrusic
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1992-05

3.  Metacognition in psychophysical judgment: an unfolding view of comparative judgments of mental workload.

Authors:  W M Petrusic; P Cloutier
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-05

4.  Effects of instruction presentation mode in comparative judgments.

Authors:  Samuel Shaki; Craig Leth-Steensen; William M Petrusic
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-01

5.  Similarity comparisons with remembered and perceived magnitudes: memory psychophysics and fundamental measurement.

Authors:  W M Petrusic; J V Baranski; R Kennedy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1998-09

6.  Evidence for implicit scaling in comparative judgment.

Authors:  K M Sailor; K M Pineda
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1993-07

7.  The calibration and resolution of confidence in perceptual judgments.

Authors:  J V Baranski; W M Petrusic
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-04

8.  Context affects the numerical semantic congruity effect in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Sarah M Jones; Jessica F Cantlon; Dustin J Merritt; Elizabeth M Brannon
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 1.777

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.