Literature DB >> 16686118

Effects of instruction presentation mode in comparative judgments.

Samuel Shaki1, Craig Leth-Steensen, William M Petrusic.   

Abstract

In each of two experiments, the comparative instructions in a symbolic comparison task were either varied randomly from trial to trial (mixed blocks) or left constant (pure blocks) within blocks of trials. In the first experiment, every stimulus was compared with every other stimulus. The symbolic distance effect (DE) was enhanced, and the semantic congruity effect (SCE) was significantly larger, when the instructions were randomized than when they were blocked. In a second experiment, each stimulus was paired with only one other stimulus. The SCE was again larger when instructions were randomized than when they were blocked. The enhanced SCE and DE with randomized instructions follow naturally from evidence accrual views of comparative judgments.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16686118     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193398

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  17 in total

1.  Negative identity priming is contingent on stimulus repetition.

Authors:  D L Strayer; S Grison
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Investigating a memory-based account of negative priming: support for selection-feature mismatch.

Authors:  P A MacDonald; S Joordens
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Semantic congruity effects and theories of the comparison process.

Authors:  W M Petrusic
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Perceptual comparisons through the mind's eye.

Authors:  A Paivio
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1975-11

Review 5.  A summary of resource theories from a behavioral perspective.

Authors:  A F Sanders
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  1997-03-21       Impact factor: 3.251

6.  Semantic congruity and lexical marking in symbolic comparisons: an expectancy hypothesis.

Authors:  M Marschark; A Paivio
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1979-05

7.  Semantic congruity effects in perceptual comparisons.

Authors:  W M Petrusic; J V Baranski
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1989-05

8.  Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations.

Authors:  D E Meyer; R W Schvaneveldt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1971-10

Review 9.  Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory.

Authors:  H Pashler
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 17.737

10.  Congruity and the perceptual comparison task.

Authors:  M Marschark; A Paivio
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  3 in total

1.  Dissecting the symbolic distance effect: comparison and priming effects in numerical and nonnumerical orders.

Authors:  Filip Van Opstal; Wim Gevers; Wendy De Moor; Tom Verguts
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-04

2.  Enhancing semantic congruity effects with category-contingent comparative judgments.

Authors:  Craig Leth-Steensen; William M Petrusic; Samuel Shaki
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-10-22

3.  Comparing the neural distance effect derived from the non-symbolic comparison and the same-different task.

Authors:  Karolien Smets; Titia Gebuis; Bert Reynvoet
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 3.169

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.