Literature DB >> 8643816

Mammography and pap smear use by older rural women.

D G Ives1, J R Lave, N D Traven, R Schulz, L H Kuller.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the characteristics of older women who did and did not have screening mammograms and Pap smears during the first two years both services were a Medicare Part B benefit.
METHODS: A prospective study was conducted in five rural Pennsylvania counties of 2205 female community-dwelling Medicare Part B beneficiaries who volunteered to participate in a Medicare prevention demonstration project. The baseline health risk appraisal included information on demographics, insurance status, disease history, symptomatology, and functional and cognitive status. These variables were tested for their association with the use of mammography and Pap smear using Medicare utilization claims data from 1991 to 1992.
RESULTS: Of 2175 women still alive after three years, 44.6% had had a mammogram and 14.6% had had a Pap smear in either 1991 or 1992. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that women were more likely to have a mammogram if they were younger, were more educated, had supplemental insurance, did not need assistance with activities of daily living, and did not have diabetes or arthritis. Younger, college educated, and non-widowed women were more likely to have Pap smears than women in other categories.
CONCLUSIONS: With cost less of a barrier, more aggressive efforts to persuade older women to have mammograms and Pap smears must be developed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8643816      PMCID: PMC1381767     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Rep        ISSN: 0033-3549            Impact factor:   2.792


  29 in total

1.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician.

Authors:  M F Folstein; S E Folstein; P R McHugh
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 4.791

2.  Who gets screened for cervical and breast cancer? Results from a new national survey.

Authors:  R A Hayward; M F Shapiro; H E Freeman; C R Corey
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1988-05

Review 3.  Breast cancer (1)

Authors:  J R Harris; M E Lippman; U Veronesi; W Willett
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-07-30       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Cervical cancer screening: who is not screened and why?

Authors:  L C Harlan; A B Bernstein; L G Kessler
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  National trends in the use of preventive health care by women.

Authors:  D M Makuc; V M Freid; J C Kleinman
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Age and Pap smear history as a basis for intervention strategy.

Authors:  C Spurlock; M Nadel; E McManmon
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  1992-04

7.  Medicare coverage, supplemental insurance, and the use of mammography by older women.

Authors:  J Blustein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1995-04-27       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Improving future preventive care through educational efforts at a women's community screening program.

Authors:  P Carney; A J Dietrich; D H Freeman
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  1992-06

9.  Increasing cervical screening in women of more than 40 years of age: an intervention in general practice.

Authors:  J Cockburn; S Hirst; D Hill; R Marks
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1990-02-19       Impact factor: 7.738

10.  Cervical cancer screening practices among older women: results from the Maryland Cervical Cancer Case-Control Study.

Authors:  D D Celentano; A C Klassen; C S Weisman; N B Rosenshein
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 6.437

View more
  14 in total

1.  The effect of Medicare reimbursement for screening mammography on utilization and payment. National Cancer Institute Breast Cancer Screening Consortium.

Authors:  N Breen; E J Feuer; S Depuy; J Zapka
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1997 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  Declining mammography screening in a state Medicaid Fee-for-Service program: 1999-2008.

Authors:  Abhijeet Bhanegaonkar; S Suresh Madhavan; Rahul Khanna; Scot C Remick
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 3.  Diabetes and cancer I: risk, survival, and implications for screening.

Authors:  Adedayo A Onitilo; Jessica M Engel; Ingrid Glurich; Rachel V Stankowski; Gail M Williams; Suhail A Doi
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 2.506

4.  The effects of mailed reminders and tailored messages on mammography screening.

Authors:  Kevin D McCaul; Kimberly S Wold
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2002-06

5.  Factors associated with use of breast cancer screening services by women aged >or= 40 years in Korea: the third Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2005 (KNHANES III).

Authors:  Kiheon Lee; Hyung Taek Lim; Sang Min Park
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-04-16       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  Process of care failures in breast cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Saul N Weingart; Mark G Saadeh; Brett Simchowitz; Tejal K Gandhi; Larissa Nekhlyudov; David M Studdert; Ann Louise Puopolo; Lawrence N Shulman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-04-23       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Impact of cognitive impairment on screening mammography use in older US women.

Authors:  Kala M Mehta; Kathy Z Fung; Christine E Kistler; Anna Chang; Louise C Walter
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  The association between cognitive impairment and breast and colorectal cancer screening utilization.

Authors:  Shuang Yang; Jiang Bian; Thomas J George; Karen Daily; Dongyu Zhang; Dejana Braithwaite; Yi Guo
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  An assessment of American Indian women's mammography experiences.

Authors:  Kimberly K Engelman; Christine M Daley; Byron J Gajewski; Florence Ndikum-Moffor; Babalola Faseru; Stacy Braiuca; Stephanie Joseph; Edward F Ellerbeck; K Allen Greiner
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 2.809

10.  Socioeconomic disparities in breast cancer screening in Hawaii.

Authors:  Timothy Halliday; Deborah A Taira; James Davis; Henry Chan
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2007-09-15       Impact factor: 2.830

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.