Literature DB >> 12027268

The effects of mailed reminders and tailored messages on mammography screening.

Kevin D McCaul1, Kimberly S Wold.   

Abstract

A mail campaign to promote mammography screening was tested with 3,887 Medicare recipients in North Dakota who had not had a mammogram in 2 1/2 years. Three types of mailings were compared: (1) a simple reminder message, (2) a reminder accompanied by a persuasive communication emphasizing personal risk, and (3) a reminder accompanied by a message tailored to the participants' chief barrier to having a mammogram. Overall, subsequent mammography rates for women in these conditions did not differ from the rate observed among women who did not receive any mailing. However, post-hoc analyses suggested that women who reported a barrier to having a mammogram were more likely to have a mammogram. Population-wide mail campaigns of the kinds tested here may be generally ineffective for Medicare recipients who are obtaining screenings infrequently. Tailoring messages may be one potentially effective intervention, if investigators can develop ways to increase responses to inquiries about barriers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12027268     DOI: 10.1023/a:1015249906674

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Community Health        ISSN: 0094-5145


  20 in total

Review 1.  Challenges and future directions for tailored communication research.

Authors:  D B Abrams; S Mills; D Bulger
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  1999

Review 2.  One size does not fit all: the case for tailoring print materials.

Authors:  M W Kreuter; V J Strecher; B Glassman
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  1999

3.  Knowledge, attitudes, and behavior of women ages 65 and older on mammography screening and Medicare: results of a national survey.

Authors:  Ellen J Eisner; Eric G Zook; Nina Goodman; Everly Macario
Journal:  Women Health       Date:  2002

4.  Evaluation of a phone intervention to promote mammography in a managed care plan.

Authors:  N A Davis; M J Lewis; B K Rimer; C M Harvey; J P Koplan
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  1997 Mar-Apr

5.  Breast cancer risk and participation in mammographic screening.

Authors:  S Taplin; C Anderman; L Grothaus
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Strategies to encourage mammography use among women in senior citizens' housing facilities.

Authors:  E King; B K Rimer; T Benincasa; C Harrop; K Amfoh; G Bonney; P Kornguth; W Demark-Wahnefried; T Strigo; P Engstrom
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.037

7.  State-specific prevalence of selected health behaviors, by race and ethnicity--Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 1997.

Authors:  J C Bolen; L Rhodes; E E Powell-Griner; S D Bland; D Holtzman
Journal:  MMWR CDC Surveill Summ       Date:  2000-03-24

8.  Mammography and pap smear use by older rural women.

Authors:  D G Ives; J R Lave; N D Traven; R Schulz; L H Kuller
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1996 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.792

9.  A randomized trial of the impact of risk assessment and feedback on participation in mammography screening.

Authors:  S J Curry; S H Taplin; C Anderman; W E Barlow; C McBride
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 4.018

10.  Health education to improve repeat participation in the Dutch breast cancer screening programme: evaluation of a leaflet tailored to previous participants.

Authors:  C H Drossaert; H Boer; E R Seydel
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  1996-07
View more
  8 in total

1.  Basic needs, stress and the effects of tailored health communication in vulnerable populations.

Authors:  Erika R Cappelletti; Matthew W Kreuter; Sonia Boyum; Tess Thompson
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2015-08

2.  Collaborative Health Reminders and Notifications: Insights from Prototypes.

Authors:  Katie O'Leary; Daryl Tanghe; Wanda Pratt; James Ralston
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2018-12-05

3.  A meta-analysis of computer-tailored interventions for health behavior change.

Authors:  Paul Krebs; James O Prochaska; Joseph S Rossi
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 4.018

4.  A randomized controlled calendar mail-out to increase cancer screening among urban American Indian and Alaska Native patients.

Authors:  Ardith Z Doorenbos; Clemma Jacobsen; Rebecca Corpuz; Ralph Forquera; Dedra Buchwald
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Cervical Cancer Education Intervention for Latinas Delivered Through Interactive, Multimedia Kiosks.

Authors:  Armando Valdez; Anna M Napoles; Susan L Stewart; Alvaro Garza
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.037

6.  Tailored interventions to promote mammography screening: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Stephanie J Sohl; Anne Moyer
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2007-06-23       Impact factor: 4.018

7.  The Efficacy of Direct Mail, Patient Navigation, and Incentives for Increasing Mammography and Colonoscopy in the Medicaid Population: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Jonathan S Slater; Michael J Parks; Christina L Nelson; Kelly D Hughes
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  Adherence to COVID-19 Precautionary Measures: Applying the Health Belief Model and Generalised Social Beliefs to a Probability Community Sample.

Authors:  Kwok Kit Tong; Juliet Honglei Chen; Eilo Wing-Yat Yu; Anise M S Wu
Journal:  Appl Psychol Health Well Being       Date:  2020-10-03
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.