Literature DB >> 8640715

When the diagnosis is cancer: patient communication experiences and preferences.

P N Butow1, J N Kazemi, L J Beeney, A M Griffin, S M Dunn, M H Tattersall.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Discrepancies exist between reported experiences of patients when they have been given a diagnosis of cancer, published guidelines for telling a diagnosis, and patterns of communication patients rate as favorable. Several studies have identified what happened and what is important to cancer patients when told their diagnosis, but no studies have addressed subsequent communications concerning the implications of the diagnosis and treatment choices. This study extended previous research by investigating the experiences and preferences for communication about diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of patients diagnosed with breast cancer or melanoma.
METHODS: A self-report questionnaire was designed for this study based on previous research and qualitative data generated from focus groups. Patients with breast cancer or melanoma answered questions about their experiences with communication at the time of diagnosis and concerning prognosis, treatment and related issues. Comparisons were made between patient experiences, preferences and published guidelines. Differences between the experiences of breast cancer and melanoma patients were tested and the relationship between communication and subsequent psychological adjustment to cancer was assessed.
RESULTS: Patient preferences for communication during diagnostic consultation were not always consistent with published guidelines. Type of cancer did not significantly affect patient preferences. Psychological adjustment was related to patient ratings of the quality of doctor discussion about treatment options, but not about the diagnosis of cancer and its implications. Patients who wanted more emotional support at the time of diagnosis subsequently experienced poorer psychological adjustment.
CONCLUSIONS: The differences in patient preferences show that a list of prescriptions for how to disclose a cancer diagnosis is too simplistic. Guidelines for clinicians should be derived from patient-based data rather than be limited only to clinical opinion. Guidelines concerning communication at the time of diagnosis also need to address discussions concerning the implications of the diagnosis and making treatment decisions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8640715     DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960615)77:12<2630::AID-CNCR29>3.0.CO;2-S

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  64 in total

1.  Predictors and outcomes of feeling of insufficient consultation time in cancer care in Korea: results of a nationwide multicenter survey.

Authors:  Dong Wook Shin; Jae-Hyun Park; Eun-Jung Shim; Myung-Il Hahm; Jong-Hyock Park; Eun-Cheol Park
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Guidelines for resection of colorectal cancer liver metastases.

Authors:  O J Garden; M Rees; G J Poston; D Mirza; M Saunders; J Ledermann; J N Primrose; R W Parks
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Understanding the needs of lung cancer patients during the pre-diagnosis phase.

Authors:  David Wiljer; Tara Walton; Julie Gilbert; Amy Boucher; Peter M Ellis; Susan Schiff; Scott M Sellick; Marko Simunovic; Andrea Bezjak; Sara Urowitz
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  Collaborative/active participation per se does not decrease anxiety in breast cancer.

Authors:  Zsuzsanna Kahán; Katalin Varga; Rita Dudás; Tibor Nyári; László Thurzó
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2006-06-24       Impact factor: 3.201

Review 5.  Cultural aspects of communication in cancer care.

Authors:  Antonella Surbone
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Seriously ill hospitalized patients' perspectives on the benefits and harms of two models of hospital CPR discussions.

Authors:  Wendy G Anderson; Jenica W Cimino; Bernard Lo
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2013-08-19

Review 7.  Conceptualizing prognostic awareness in advanced cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Allison J Applebaum; Elissa A Kolva; Julia R Kulikowski; Jordana D Jacobs; Antonio DeRosa; Wendy G Lichtenthal; Megan E Olden; Barry Rosenfeld; William Breitbart
Journal:  J Health Psychol       Date:  2013-10-24

8.  Bad news and first impressions: patient and family caregiver accounts of learning the cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Karen Sue Schaepe
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2011-07-23       Impact factor: 4.634

9.  Oncologists and Breaking Bad News-From the Informed Patients' Point of View. The Evaluation of the SPIKES Protocol Implementation.

Authors:  Paweł Marschollek; Katarzyna Bąkowska; Wojciech Bąkowski; Karol Marschollek; Radosław Tarkowski
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.037

10.  Cancer patient preferences for quality and length of life.

Authors:  Neal J Meropol; Brian L Egleston; Joanne S Buzaglo; Al B Benson; Donald J Cegala; Michael A Diefenbach; Linda Fleisher; Suzanne M Miller; Daniel P Sulmasy; Kevin P Weinfurt
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 6.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.